4.27 invited 19 reviewers, and currently 5 have accepted the invitation.

(0) 讚！ | zhuangy

2025.4.21 STJ
2025.4.22 WE
2025.4.23 UR
So fast, sent to 11 reviewers, a bit scared. I want to ask if this journal is OA? Why didn't I see the OA option when transferring from CEJ? I can't afford OA QAQ.

(0) 讚！ | Yu

25/04/21 2 reviewers, 3 opinions, thank you to the lenient reviewer.

(0) 讚！ | 啦啦啦elf

25/04/14 提交到期刊
25/04/14 与编辑联系
25/04/15 审稿中

25/04/14 submitted to journal
25/04/14 with editor
25/04/15 under review

(0) 讚！ | zhuangy

Please translate the following paragraph into English: 2025.3.30 STJ 2025.4.1 WE 2025.4.5 WE 蹲一个心软编辑

2025.3.30 STJ
2025.4.1 WE
2025.4.5 WE
Waiting for a soft-hearted editor.

(0) 讚！ | CC_NoCC

Hello, may I ask where can I see the number of reviewers invited for this invitation? The mini program is currently not working, and I would like to know the progress.

(0) 讚！ | 少管我

04-01 Invite 8, accept 1
04-04 Invite 15, accept 2
Accept one modification opportunity, please please please!

(0) 讚！ | 啦啦啦elf

I changed the time of my meeting on the 27th, but it has been a week and there has been no movement.

(0) 讚！ | Accept一万次

04-01 Under review, please contact the handling editor for the manuscript!

(0) 讚！ | 啦啦啦elf

I would like to ask which department you are in. I am in environmental process technology and submitted my application for the 29th position. I am still waiting for a response.

(0) 讚！ | 我想回家

Are there any EPT boards invested by friends? What are the speeds?

(0) 讚！ | 我想回家

25/03/31 提交给期刊
25/03/31 与编辑联系
25/04/01 与编辑联系
Looking for a kind-hearted editor.

(0) 讚！ | 啦啦啦elf

The difficulty of submitting articles to ER is increasing (due to the large number of submissions), and the quality requirements for manuscripts are also getting higher. However, the efficiency of the editors is still acceptable, so it is worth a try if the quality of the article is good.

(0) 讚！ | 顶刊收割机之锦鲤附体ing

How is the follow-up going?

(0) 讚！ | feiruyunduan

Just one day after submitting my application and it's already in the decision process. Does that mean I'm out of luck?

(0) 讚！ | feiruyunduan

September 26 submitted to journal; 
September 27 with editor; 
September 28 under review; 
A total of four reviewers accepted the review one by one within a week; 
October 24 revise, Environmental research seems not to distinguish between major and minor revisions, all are unified as revise, but from the comments, it should be a major revision (four reviewers, a total of 30 revision comments); 
November 13 revision; 
November 30 accept; 
December 2 online; 
December 3 proof; 
December 4 submit proof; 
December 6 officially published.

(0) 讚！ | 南星0729

Overall, it's not bad from what I can see from this submission. The journal actually processed it quite quickly. The only issue I encountered was with one of the reviewers, who kept bringing up the same problem that I couldn't resolve. I didn't make any changes, but the kind-hearted editor still accepted it. Grateful for that.

(0) 讚！ | 全都accept！

Did the editor accept it directly, or did they invite new reviewers for a third round of review?

(0) 讚！ | 张慧

06.19 submitted to journal
06.20 with editor
06.21 with editor
07.07 under review
07.08 under review
07.16 required reviews completed
07.20 required reviews completed
07.23 major revision
08.19 re submitted to journal
08.20 with editor
09.04 under review
09.05 accept

(0) 讚！ | 多多益善~

The editor requested the upload of the first draft in the email, but I forgot to upload the initial submission.

(0) 讚！ | 小菜包~

I would like to ask if you have submitted the initial manuscript when submitting the revised draft.

(0) 讚！ | 小菜包~

Do I need to submit the initial manuscript when submitting a revised version to ER?

(0) 讚！ | 小菜包~

Hello. I would like to inquire about the Environmental Research submission system. There doesn't seem to be a place to fill in recommended reviewers. Did you fill it out when you submitted before? Also, there is no option for selecting the publication format for the paper. Did you encounter the same issue when you submitted? Please advise.

(0) 讚！ | Mr Black

Under review

(0) 讚！ | nobody123

10.23 Submission
10.24 Under Review
1.24 Received reviewers' comments, a total of two experts, one of whom did not have specific issues, only gave a suggestion, while the other expert gave 10 detailed suggestions. 1.30 Returned after revisions (in a hurry for the Chinese New Year...)
2.14 Accepted, but pointed out a new error in the added image (cannot be careless just because of rushing for the Chinese New Year)
Now waiting for the proof to be finalized and then changing the image should be okay.
Thanks to Michelle for editing, the overall efficiency is very high, just took a bit longer to find reviewers (or maybe I was just too impatient and thought it was slow).

(0) 讚！ | EasonWangEMF