3.18 Submission
3.19 Editor assigned
3.22 Peer review with two reviewers
The first reviewer was very quick, providing feedback in just 3-4 days, while the second reviewer was much slower, taking about a month to provide feedback.
I used AI to simulate the reviewers and conducted additional experiments based on their feedback, so I was able to make the revisions in just one day.
4.30 Revised manuscript submitted, peer review with two reviewers
Similar to before, the first reviewer provided feedback in 3-4 days, while the second took about two weeks.
Minor revisions were suggested by the first reviewer regarding text and table optimization, while the second reviewer had no comments.
Revisions were quickly made and submitted.
5.27 Acceptance.
6.10 Published.
The entire process took less than three months. This was my first journal paper in my life, and the submission experience exceeded my expectations by far. Grateful for the kind reviewers!!!

(1) 讚！ | 陈孙涛

May I ask about the progress of your submission? My work has been sitting there for eleven days without any updates.

(0) 讚！ | 努力发一篇一区

Is there a follow-up?

(0) 讚！ | 拾_

It won't be this editor swathi.venkatesan@springernature.com.

(0) 讚！ | bigbrz

May I ask if the original poster has requested any modifications after the second review? My status has not been updated since the first submission for technical review.

(0) 讚！ | 117、

May I ask if this journal will reject submissions after major revisions?

(0) 讚！ | 117、

Is there any news behind?

(0) 讚！ | 117、

Can I ask if this journal will reject submissions after major revisions?

(0) 讚！ | 117、

June 17, 2026 at 9:54, cast your vote.

(0) 讚！ | yiming088

Excuse me, have you followed up? What is the email address of the editor-in-chief?

(0) 讚！ | youyu

Has the submission been withdrawn?

(0) 讚！ | youyu

Submitted on January 19th
Reviewed on January 27th
Still under review as of June 8th
Three reminders sent during this period, do we need to keep waiting?

(0) 讚！ | 科研狗

Shall we send an email to remind them as it has been over a month?

(0) 讚！ | nearbyhawaii

Submitted on April 30th, it is still under review now.

(0) 讚！ | nearbyhawaii

Overall, it's quite fast.

(0) 讚！ | king-qi

Sure, thank you for your reply. I wish you early acceptance!

(0) 讚！ | jiachun Wu

Innovation and contributions are not enough to say, after more than a month without submission, it was directly rejected. How should I put it, it's still better than not submitting for half a year.

(0) 讚！ | LPYLPY

Hello, may I ask for the reasons for the rejection?

(0) 讚！ | jiachun Wu

The progress is still a bit slow.

(0) 讚！ | king-qi

4.16 Editing Rejection

(0) 讚！ | LPYLPY

Submission received on November 23, 2025
Submission passed technical check on November 24, 2025
With editor on November 24, 2025
Peer review invitation sent to three reviewers on January 12, 2026
Revision requested - major revisions, deadline is 3 months on January 25, 2026
Revision received - major revisions completed on March 08, 2026
Submission passed technical check on March 09, 2026
Reviewer(s) accepted on March 10, 2026 - three reviewers invited
As of March 10, 2026, two reviewers have completed their reviews (one within a day, the other has not responded for almost two weeks)
Third reviewer completed review on March 24, 2026
Editor responded with minor revisions on March 27, 2026 - two reviewers accepted, third reviewer requested revision of repeated points
Minor revisions completed on April 2, 2026
Accepted on April 13, 2026 - no further reviewers contacted for minor revisions.

(1) 讚！ | Null

Have you acc'ed, bro?

(0) 讚！ | Null

Same here, now it has been a week since I had my car repaired and I haven't received any updates yet. I also went through a major repair before.

(0) 讚！ | Null

How long has it been quiet behind me, my current state is the same as yours before.

(1) 讚！ | 科研狗

Two months is considered fast. The journals I submitted to before usually took over six months for review. Just have to wait patiently.

(0) 讚！ | king-qi