I submitted my paper in December of my 23rd year and have been unable to find a reviewer. In July, I received feedback for revisions and returned it on August 14th. I finally received the first reviewer's comments on August 23rd, but it has been over a month and I still can't find the second reviewer. I am so anxious because I need to graduate soon.

(0) 讚！ | 一只星剑呀

Has the status of your journal changed now?

(0) 讚！ | Adelaide Lawson

I have been squatting for the sequel, and I also had a major revision from December of the 23rd year to the end of July. I returned for revisions in mid-August and have been looking for reviewers to review the manuscript until the end of September.

(0) 讚！ | 一只星剑呀

May I ask from which step you have not seen any changes? Is there anyone reviewing the manuscript?

(0) 讚！ | bagamagic

How is it going now? Have you withdrawn the submission?

(0) 讚！ | 陌迪

I envy you, the process in front of me and the first reviewer on your side are as fast as yours. It is said that we need to receive opinions from all reviewers before informing the author of the review comments. But the second reviewer has not appeared yet. I am worried and anxious.

(0) 讚！ | bagamagic

Luck was pretty good, with a notice of acceptance after three months. Submitted on June 4th, passed technical review and assigned an editor on June 6th. Due to a discrepancy between a statement in the manuscript and the submission system, it was returned for revisions with a request for point-to-point responses that seemed unreasonable. After making the necessary changes within an hour, it was resubmitted, but then got stuck. Unfortunately, it was not until July 2nd that reviewers were invited. Reviewers 1 and 2 accepted on July 10th and July 25th respectively, providing feedback within a week. Revisions were made on August 5th. Reviewer 1 had 6 issues while Reviewer 2 was very thorough with nearly 30 suggestions for modifications, all of which were constructive without any negative feedback. After a few days of hard work, revisions were submitted on August 18th, addressing all issues without any compromises. Sent for a second review on August 21st, Reviewer 1 did not respond, but Reviewer 2 agreed: "I have reviewed the revised manuscript and feel the authors have sufficiently addressed comments and requests for revisions." Acceptance notification was received on September 6th. As of September 9th, there has been no notification for copyediting.

(0) 讚！ | zzugzf

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0 Emphasis on research direction: Public health experience sharing: It took more than 4 months to receive the results. Submitted on April 28th, passed technical review and assigned editor on May 6th. However, due to a problem with the submission system, it was stuck for over a month after resubmission. Only officially started inviting reviewers on June 13th. By July 8th, a total of 2 reviewers were invited, and around mid-July, feedback on revisions was received. Revised on July 23rd, one reviewer provided 6 questions, and the other provided over 20 suggestions for modifications. It felt like the paper was in danger, but luckily there was no rejection. Actively cooperated with the revisions and submitted the revised version on August 10th, making all the necessary changes without delaying the process. Sent for a second review on August 26th, and the reviewers have reviewed the revised manuscript and found that the authors have adequately addressed comments and revision requests. Received a notice of acceptance yesterday.

(0) 讚！ | Adelaide Lawson

May I ask how many peer reviewers agreed to review the manuscript? I have received one reviewer's feedback, but have not been able to find a second reviewer willing to review the manuscript.

(0) 讚！ | bagamagic

May I ask if there is peer review for agreement on the review?

(0) 讚！ | bagamagic

Received a review comment on August 26th.

(0) 讚！ | 缱绻他的蓝瞳

May I ask if you have checked with the editor for a new reviewer after receiving the first reviewer's report? Or did they directly reject the manuscript after waiting for 10 months???

(0) 讚！ | bagamagic

Be careful when submitting to this magazine! It's a really disappointing one! Submitted in January 2024, rejected in September 2024 citing inability to find a reviewer as the reason!

(0) 讚！ | 璃沙凯安

I am interdisciplinary, feeling okay, with a large element of luck. Submitted for over two months, received feedback on 4.27, first major revision on 6.23, second major revision on 7.22, and finally accepted on 8.26.

(0) 讚！ | 小牛马哥

The reviewers have provided their feedback, and the editor has requested revision by August 21st.

(0) 讚！ | luminosity

Rejected after review?

(0) 讚！ | 陈橙

It took 3 months and 3 reminders before it was finally submitted for review.

(0) 讚！ | Wangkiwah

Just invested, good luck!

(0) 讚！ | 咏春又夏

Reviewers agreed.

(1) 讚！ | 缱绻他的蓝瞳

I feel really uncomfortable. The editor doesn't look for new reviewers and doesn't take any action.

(0) 讚！ | 回风嘉蕊

Yes, there is no need for a PDF and the author's agreement is not required.

(0) 讚！ | 霹雳小海

Review speed: 12.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0 Experience sharing: Submission received 04 Sep 2023 Reviewer(s) accepted 19 Oct 2023 Reviewer report(s) received 27 Oct 2023 The first reviewer's comments from October last year returned, and after looking for 10 months for reviewers, no one reviewed it. The first reviewer's comments were major revisions. Submission rejected 05 Aug 2024 Editor rejection.

(0) 讚！ | 鸳鸯之云

7.18 editor assigned, 10 reviewers invited on 7.26, really just waiting and waiting and waiting.

(2) 讚！ | 缱绻他的蓝瞳

There is no text provided to translate.

(0) 讚！ | 缱绻他的蓝瞳

Excuse me, after making changes, why does the system only allow for the submission of one file each for "upload manuscript" and "point-by-point for reviewers" when it requires the submission of revision and final files along with a "point-by-point for reviewers" file? How did you proceed when submitting your files at that time?

(0) 讚！ | 一只勤奋的牛