Did the original poster get results so quickly after submitting?

(0) 讚！ | 123chemis

On February 3rd, 2021, submitted.
On February 6th, 2021, under review.
On February 9th, 2021, under review.
On March 4th, 2021, decision in progress.
It has been three days and no decision has been made yet. Hoping for a positive outcome.

(5) 讚！ | oolili

If there are good results, I will come to fulfill my vow.

(4) 讚！ | Albert-wang

The text translates to: "The submission on 2.28 immediately turned into 'with editor', and until now, there has been no progress."

(0) 讚！ | 蛋蛋打不死

On the day of February 19, I submitted it to the editor, but until now it is still with the editor.

(0) 讚！ | zzde山楂

Has your paper been sent for review now? I have been with the editor for almost half a month.

(0) 讚！ | zzde山楂

Is your paper still under review? It has been almost half a month and it is still "with editor".

(0) 讚！ | zzde山楂

May I ask if you have been under review with the editor for one and a half months? And did it take a long time for it to be under review again? It has been twenty days since I submitted, and it has also been with the editor the whole time.

(0) 讚！ | dudud

February 10, 2021, it's good to submit before the Chinese New Year, but it has been 12 days and it's still with the editor.

(2) 讚！ | dudud

During my PhD, I shared the progress of my first SCI article with everyone. The editor was very responsible and sent it for review three days after submission. They found three reviewers, and the editor also provided valuable suggestions.

2020.10.16 Submitted
2020.10.19 Under review
2020.12.11 Required Reviews Completed
2020.12.27 Revise

2021.1.19 Revision submitted
2021.1.19 Under review
2021.2.7 Required Reviews Completed
2021.2.8 Decision in Process
2.8 Accept

(37) 讚！ | Silence_Liu

I would like to consult with you. Did JHM suggest transferring to ER, and did you confirm the transfer in the JHM system and then resubmit it in the ER system?

(0) 讚！ | Joy

Me too! It has always been submitted to journal23333.

(0) 讚！ | Ainnquy

The first submission to ER, the overall review speed and article quality were quite good.
Submitted on June 18, 2020.
Major revisions made on August 17.
Revised and resubmitted on September 3.
Accepted on September 11.
Although it is not as popular as STOTEN and EP in the field of environmental hygiene, the articles are still very good. It is worth everyone's try.

(1) 讚！ | idiotxy

It was submitted on April 7th and sent for review on the 12th. Minor revisions were required on May 26th. There were 4 questions. The revised manuscript was returned on 31st, and it was sent for review again on June 3rd. Then there was a long and endless wait... On July 10th, the review date changed. It is estimated that the editor found that the reviewer did nothing so he reminded the manuscript. It was accepted on July 25th. The mood is really like a roller coaster. I checked the ER articles, and there were many manuscripts which had been sent for review for more than one month after the minor revision, and I also saw that they were only accepted 4 months after the minor revised submission. It is really up to my fate to receive the results after the revised submission.

(9) 讚！ | 袖白雪

It was in the Nanomaterials Photocatalysis direction. 14 Feb, submitted to journal, and it was with editor directly; 18 Feb, under review; 21 Feb, under editor evaluation; 23 Feb, revision was required. There were 2 reviewers and 8 comments in total; 25 Feb, revision submitted to journal, and it was with editor directly; 27 Feb, under review; 02 Mar, accept. 03 Mar online available. Thanks a lot to editor Aijie Wang!

(56) 讚！ | Mango

Submitted on the last day of 2019, it was reviewed for about a month, letting us make a major revision, basically answering some questions of the meaning of the article, which are difficult to answer. But it's easy to revise the article. I modified it for a week and submitted it, and after another week, it was sent back and we continued to revise it because I misunderstood the reviewer’s comments. It was resubmitted the same day, and it took more than a week to be accepted on February 25. Overall it was very fast in less than two months. Don’t look at the reviews to know the journal’s speed. It mainly depends on the articles. If the editor is interested in your article and the quality is high, it will be fast. Now that the requirements have been changed, I don't know how useful SCI papers are. I graduated in January this year. This is my seventh SCI paper. I personally think it's okay. Students who are still in postgraduate, come on!

(35) 讚！ | 二班的男生

The journal with journal for one month, followed by editor for three days, was rejected for review, and the speed of the journal was really slow.

(0) 讚！ | li_miany

The journal with journal is one month, then with editor for three days, no review is rejected, the journal's speed is trueSlow.

(0) 讚！ | li_miany

was rejected, with editor for one month, the reason is not consistent with the scope of the journal, I am also very helpless~

(1) 讚！ | 安琪儿

The first article, because English refuses the second article, the scope of the journal does not match the third article, with editor one and a half monthsUnder review four months... rejectedSLOW!!English requirements are high!!

(1) 讚！ | 小学

The English requirements are very strict and have been changed to 3 drafts, one month at a time.I am returning to the third revision today and hope to have a good result!

(1) 讚！ | yujingangcsu

Online submission URL: http://ees.elsevier.com/er/

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Environment journal, focusing on environmental health aspects

(0) 讚！ | 匿名

Journal Homepage URL: http://http://www.elsevier.com/w ... /622821/description

(0) 讚！ | 匿名