It has been over a month since I submitted it, and it has been under review all this time. I have sent two emails to the editor inquiring about the progress of the manuscript, but there has been no response. I don't know if I sent it to the wrong email or what the issue is. I was hoping that getting this article accepted would make my chance of getting a Ph.D. more stable. Have any experts here followed up on manuscripts with this journal before? How should I proceed?

(0) 讚！ | 暴走萝莉熊

There is no fixed format for a response letter, just write it yourself and it will be fine.

(0) 讚！ | ahfeqiweqiwohfeqiwo

No need. Just list the questions and answers clearly.

(0) 讚！ | 凤山路齐达内

Excuse me, everyone, what is the format for a response letter? Is it double-spaced like a research paper, or single-spaced? Thank you, everyone.

(0) 讚！ | Alisa123

Hello, may I ask what is the format for a response letter? Is it the same format as a research paper, with double spacing? Or is it single spacing? Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | Alisa123

Hello, may I ask what is the format of a response letter? Is it the same format as a research paper, with double spacing?

(0) 讚！ | Alisa123

May I ask how long it takes for Accept to be published?

(0) 讚！ | tdai05

So fast... So sour.

(0) 讚！ | Q.W.

The speed is very fast. Submitted on 4.14, received feedback for revision on 5.17. Two reviewers provided 14 suggestions. Revised on 5.23 and received minor revisions on 6.23. The revised version was accepted before 8 pm, less than three hours after it was sent back in the afternoon. The speed is as fast as a rocket.

(0) 讚！ | ahfeqiweqiwohfeqiwo

How long does the Undergoing Review process take?

(0) 讚！ | 加载中

A very good journal, the first review took about two months. The editor found four reviewers, and their questions were very incisive. They gave me 28 days to make major revisions, which felt quite tight on time. I submitted the revised version one month later and it was accepted.

(0) 讚！ | 摸鱼

May I ask when the article, published online in September 2020, will be assigned a volume number? When will it be eligible for SCI retrieval?

(1) 讚！ | 叶知秋

When it comes to publishing, it should be Xiaoxiu.

(0) 讚！ | Ooee

The one who will send you an email, just pay directly with a credit card.

(0) 讚！ | Ooee

Two reviewers provided detailed comments and suggestions on how to improve the manuscript, and the review process was also quite fast.

(0) 讚！ | Ooee

Submission 2020.12.03
Major overhaul 2021.2.23
Received 2020.3.10
Very efficient

(0) 讚！ | YUzikun

May I ask, have you received the reviewer's comments? XXX has been reviewed by the GRSL Editorial Review Board and recommended for publication, pending satisfactory revisions as suggested. It does not specify whether it requires major or minor revisions, but the submission system indicates "Revisions Required." Does anyone have any information about this? Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | 卷积

What is the payment method for making the wrong call?

(0) 讚！ | SkIoLO

May I ask how to pay for this journal? Will I receive a payment email?

(0) 讚！ | SkIoLO

Hello, I would like to ask if you went through a major revision before resubmitting this article after it was rejected?

(0) 讚！ | 千里独行

Just want to ask, is it the previous reviewer who encourages resubmission after the major revision is rejected?

(0) 讚！ | I aiding

recommended several active reviewers in the field.

The first review was in February, and they provided some major revision suggestions, although not many.

The second review was in January, and they provided some minor suggestions. The revisions were made on the same day and accepted.

Journal

(0) 讚！ | leileileia

It took 4 months and a half in total. 2020.06.07, submitted to the journal; 2020.07.13, reject and resubmit; 2020.08.24, major revision; 2020.09.22, accept. The review of this journal was formal and meticulous, especially some reviewers were very serious and had many problems! It is a very good journal.

(16) 讚！ | ViviTsai

2020/04/24, submission (then the status in the system was always undergoing review); 2020/05/21, the decision was returned: major revision (the revised manuscript must be returned in 28 days). It was faster than I expected, the result came out in less than one month. My article was on cross application of artificial intelligence and remote sensing. There were three reviewers and more than 20 comments in total. Some were discussion issues, some were language issues, and some were experimental content issues. The reviewers were professional and responsible, and the issues (raised) were very accurate. I don't know why it is stipulated that I must submit the revision within 28 days (4 weeks). In addition, the editor now has sent two emails to remind me that the revision must be submitted before the deadline, otherwise it should be resubmitted. Because of the need to do new experiments, time is actually a bit rushed. It is currently under revision. I will share the experience with you when there is news later. I hope it can be accepted later!

(22) 讚！ | 贫民窟的科学家

The manuscript was submitted on the 12th, and it was rejected on 16th for being not suitable for the journal scope based on the reference. The speed is extremely fast… It is not clear that this is the adequate venue for your manuscript... Your list of references is a strong indication that your manuscript targets the Geophysics and Geology community. It may indeed not belong to remote sensing, but it is indeed a study of earth science issues. So I must use remote sensing methods to study Geoscience?

(0) 讚！ | 竹泉听风