A very good journal, the first review took about two months. The editor found four reviewers, and their questions were very incisive. They gave me 28 days to make major revisions, which felt quite tight on time. I submitted the revised version one month later and it was accepted.

(0) 讚！ | 摸鱼

May I ask when the article, published online in September 2020, will be assigned a volume number? When will it be eligible for SCI retrieval?

(1) 讚！ | 叶知秋

When it comes to publishing, it should be Xiaoxiu.

(0) 讚！ | Ooee

The one who will send you an email, just pay directly with a credit card.

(0) 讚！ | Ooee

Two reviewers provided detailed comments and suggestions on how to improve the manuscript, and the review process was also quite fast.

(0) 讚！ | Ooee

Submission 2020.12.03
Major overhaul 2021.2.23
Received 2020.3.10
Very efficient

(0) 讚！ | YUzikun

May I ask, have you received the reviewer's comments? XXX has been reviewed by the GRSL Editorial Review Board and recommended for publication, pending satisfactory revisions as suggested. It does not specify whether it requires major or minor revisions, but the submission system indicates "Revisions Required." Does anyone have any information about this? Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | 卷积

What is the payment method for making the wrong call?

(0) 讚！ | SkIoLO

May I ask how to pay for this journal? Will I receive a payment email?

(0) 讚！ | SkIoLO

Hello, I would like to ask if you went through a major revision before resubmitting this article after it was rejected?

(0) 讚！ | 千里独行

Just want to ask, is it the previous reviewer who encourages resubmission after the major revision is rejected?

(0) 讚！ | I aiding

recommended several active reviewers in the field.

The first review was in February, and they provided some major revision suggestions, although not many.

The second review was in January, and they provided some minor suggestions. The revisions were made on the same day and accepted.

Journal

(0) 讚！ | leileileia

It took 4 months and a half in total. 2020.06.07, submitted to the journal; 2020.07.13, reject and resubmit; 2020.08.24, major revision; 2020.09.22, accept. The review of this journal was formal and meticulous, especially some reviewers were very serious and had many problems! It is a very good journal.

(16) 讚！ | ViviTsai

2020/04/24, submission (then the status in the system was always undergoing review); 2020/05/21, the decision was returned: major revision (the revised manuscript must be returned in 28 days). It was faster than I expected, the result came out in less than one month. My article was on cross application of artificial intelligence and remote sensing. There were three reviewers and more than 20 comments in total. Some were discussion issues, some were language issues, and some were experimental content issues. The reviewers were professional and responsible, and the issues (raised) were very accurate. I don't know why it is stipulated that I must submit the revision within 28 days (4 weeks). In addition, the editor now has sent two emails to remind me that the revision must be submitted before the deadline, otherwise it should be resubmitted. Because of the need to do new experiments, time is actually a bit rushed. It is currently under revision. I will share the experience with you when there is news later. I hope it can be accepted later!

(22) 讚！ | 贫民窟的科学家

The manuscript was submitted on the 12th, and it was rejected on 16th for being not suitable for the journal scope based on the reference. The speed is extremely fast… It is not clear that this is the adequate venue for your manuscript... Your list of references is a strong indication that your manuscript targets the Geophysics and Geology community. It may indeed not belong to remote sensing, but it is indeed a study of earth science issues. So I must use remote sensing methods to study Geoscience?

(0) 讚！ | 竹泉听风

GRSL This year's impact factor is foresubmitteding around 3.3, which is higher than JSTARS 2.9.It is very likely that the second half of the year will be upgraded to the second district to replace JSTARS...

(3) 讚！ | JSTRAS

Remote Sensing Magazine's old mainstream journal, IEEE TGRS letter version, double column no more than5 pages.The paper has high innovation and language requirements. Although the impact factor is not high, it is 2.761 in 2017, but it is widely recognized in the field of microwave remote sensing.Personally, the number of remote sensing journals from TGRS and RSE is IEEE GRSL, IEEE JSTARS and the like.

(4) 讚！ | GRSL

2017.07.12 submitted2017.08.23 Major Revision A reviewer has no comments, another let's add an experiment, add a descriptionLate procrastination, 2017.11.12 submitted a revised draft, it is almost three months to modify the deadline2017.12.14 Minor Revision format and word modification issuesThe revised draft was submitted the next day, 2018.01.05 acceptThis publication is a monthly publication, not a Quarterly

(1) 讚！ | test

Highly efficient journals!One month after the submission, the overhaul was given. After three months of revision, I revised it for 2 months (more time during that period), and then resubmitted it. It was released on a Tuesday and was received directly. The efficiency was extremely high.The reviewer's opinion was very pertinent, and a total of three reviewers in the first instance gave more than 10 comments..

(1) 讚！ | Li

I am also undergoing review One and a half months have not changed, is this still in the preliminary review, or is already in the hands of reviewers..

(11) 讚！ | yiyao

Nearly half a year for the first review. The second and final reviews were relatively smooth. Both reviewers were professional.

(8) 讚！ | Robert3443@vip.qq.com

Submitted the results after 40 days, major revision, submitted the revised draft after one month, returned the opinion after 50 days, minor revision, the editor asked a question, the day was changed, and received two days later.

(5) 讚！ | aqin

contributed 3 and a half months of results, minor repairs, received after one month, but scheduled for 4 months later.

(3) 讚！ | 阿刚

contributed 3 and a half months of results, minor repairs, received after one month, but scheduled for 4 months later.

(0) 讚！ | 阿刚

has two articles, minor revision and major revision. The review opinions are very detailed, and some questions are also discussed.Mainly pay attention to new methods and ideas, and have experimental data processing results.The review is about 40 days.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名