No need.

(0) 讚！ | _songj

Disgusting, I feel the same way.

(0) 讚！ | TheodoreFeng

Hello, do you have a Word template? The rejection letter said the format was not appropriate.

(0) 讚！ | jie277

Does anyone know what to do in this situation? Has anyone experienced this before?

(0) 讚！ | meiyitian

It is not a good thing to have too many or too few reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | xjtuwp

Why don't we RRC after receiving feedback from two reviewers?

(0) 讚！ | xjtuwp

The first review has not returned yet, and only one reviewer has accepted the review so far. It's been five months and we have no other options.

(0) 讚！ | meiyitian

5.31 update No update in time Status unchanged Still With Editor.

(0) 讚！ | 命运

5.31 No changes in time, no changes in status, still With Editor.

(0) 讚！ | 命运

It took almost two months to submit for review. How long will the review period be? It's so slow.

(0) 讚！ | 命运

My first TOP in Area 1 was a very tough process.
2025.4.15, Submit
2025.4.16, With Editor
2025.4.17, Under Review
2025.8.05, R&R, more than 10 reviewers, many of whom accepted the review but then abandoned it after a month.
2025.12.14, ReSubmit, because during this time I was writing for ICASSP and had to do a lot of experiments, so it took longer.
2026.2.16, Major Revision, with a new reviewer. New reviewers mean new problems. Luckily, by this time ICASSP had already accepted my paper. Also, the editor had changed, and the success rate of inviting reviewers from different fields was much higher than before, with 2 invitations resulting in 2 acceptances, so the process was much faster.
2026.3.31, Submit, because I had to do more experiments.
2026.5.20, I invited new reviewers again, because after two months it seemed that the original reviewer had abandoned the review. The new reviewer might have new opinions.
2026.5.21, RRC, the new reviewer had not accepted the review yet, but it ended immediately. Perhaps I was lucky, as the original reviewer saw the email and remembered the article, so they replied immediately.
2026.5.28, DIP
2026.5.30, Accept

(0) 讚！ | _songj

Has the first-instance decision come back?

(0) 讚！ | xjtuwp

It takes over a month for review, it's too difficult.

(0) 讚！ | wy_bio

Submit with editor on May 13th.

(0) 讚！ | 羊羔

请提供需要翻译的文本。

(0) 讚！ | 小猪快骑

At least wait for over a month, with the status "with editor".

(0) 讚！ | haoy001

How long does the status of "With Editor" usually last? Is there any indication? I don't see any changes in time, is the editing process so slow?

(0) 讚！ | 命运

Submitted on 4.11, invited for editing on 5.14, but still no response until now...

(0) 讚！ | 苍茫丿天际丶

Also the same.

(0) 讚！ | 逆风

Record:
Submitted on 5.10, as of now, it is With Editor.

(0) 讚！ | 命运

Do all co-authors need to confirm the submission of the Information Fusion manuscript?

(0) 讚！ | Afar

I am the co-editor with you, have you submitted it for review?

(0) 讚！ | 游离断点

May I ask if you have any news, teacher? I have just submitted mine.

(0) 讚！ | 游离断点

The reason for the rejection was that the manuscript did not meet the publication requirements. I then downloaded the system manuscript to see for myself, and it turned out that my teacher had mistakenly duplicated the last few pages of my PDF manuscript. Can I resubmit in this case?

(0) 讚！ | dandande

Excuse me, is the "highlights" section placed in the main text of the LaTeX document? Or is there a specific box for it on the submission page?

(0) 讚！ | 命运