Any comrades submitting articles? Can you share your experience?

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Just submitted, hope the editor can be efficient and quick

(0) 讚！ | 锦曦可爱吗

It's really frustrating that it's already February and the results are still under review

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Submitted: 27 September 2014 Peer review status: initial assessment It's really helpless, it's been over a month

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Submitted: 27 September 2014   Peer review status: initial assessment     It's really helpless, it's been more than a month

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Submitted: 27 September 2014   Peer review status: initial assessment   This rhythm is really a bit slow, it feels like the same pace as BMC CANCER

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Submitted: 27 September 2014  Peer review status: initial assessment
The pace is really slow, it feels like it's in sync with BMC CANCER

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Where are you the editor from?

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

175.173.57.18, editor, what to do if a reminder letter was sent and there was no response, and it is still in the initial state? It has been 5 weeks since submission. What will happen next?

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

My initial assessment took almost 3 weeks to enter under review, and now it has been under review for almost 4 weeks. The article review is quite detailed, so the speed is a bit slow. Well, thank you. It seems that the requirements of the journal are getting higher. I hope my article will be accepted

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Hello! It has been almost six weeks and my status is still “initial”. What should I do? I have written letters to follow up but have not received any response

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

How long does it usually take for my initial assessment? It's been more than two weeks and there has been no progress

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

The reviewing process of the journal is now very meticulous, providing valuable insights and comments. Although it was rejected, it has greatly improved the quality of the article!

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

My initial assessment took nearly 3 weeks to enter under review, and now it has been under review for almost 4 weeks. The review process is quite detailed, so the pace is a bit slow

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Submitted on the 10th, still in initial assessment, luckily I'm not in a rush, let's see how long he can drag this out

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

175.173.57    Forget it, the editorial committee is slow enough as a snail

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

People downstairs are talking nonsense. I am the editor, and there shouldn't be any problem with the May issue next year. I don't know if you understand or just talk nonsense. This is a public platform, please be responsible for your words. We are now very strict in reviewing articles by Chinese authors, and the number of submissions has also increased dramatically. Therefore, it may take a little longer, but we review very carefully!

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

It has been a month since submission. I wrote a letter to urge review, but after 5 days, it is still at the Initial assessment stage. Can anyone tell me if there is no chance and they are preparing to reject it? How come some authors can pass the Initial assessment in just 2 weeks? Thank you!

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

It is a really good article, so don't submit it to this magazine, it's slow, and they will probably give it a 4 score next year. If there's nowhere else to submit, you can consider it

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Hoping to achieve a score of 5 next year. It is necessary to control the frequency of posting, but the quality of the articles is still good

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Does this magazine require the original Western blot images?

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

I have been waiting for 1 month since submitting my manuscript, and it is still in initial assessment. It's too slow

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Submitted on 3.25, published online on 6.22, feeling pretty good about the speed

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: It took a little over 5 months from submission to ePUB for my article, but since I wasn't in a hurry, I thought the speed was acceptable. The specific timeline is as follows: Two weeks after the initial assessment, it moved to under review with a lengthy process. There were two reviewers, one of whom returned their comments to the editor in about a month, while the other reviewer took over two months to return their comments to the editor (I believe it was the reviewer's delay, not the editor's). After receiving the review comments, the editor asked me to revise the manuscript according to the comments within two days and gave me a month to make the revisions. After I completed the revisions, the editor asked for a second review by the reviewers, which took a little over two weeks. The editorial decision making process took four days, and finally, my article was accepted. This journal typically updates the status of your article or emails you every Monday

(0) 讚！ | 震山斯乔

How long does it take for editorial decision making?

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁