How many reviewers does this journal have? Thank you

(0) 讚！ | hdjhfjd

I didn't upload the sequencing results

(0) 讚！ | 磕盐的修勾

Do I need to upload the raw sequencing data when submitting this journal for the first time?

(0) 讚！ | hdjhfjd

Has your submission been reviewed?

(0) 讚！ | 无冬小晨

My editorial email reply has already been sent to find reviewers, but the status is still "editorial review." What's going on?

(0) 讚！ | 无冬小晨

It has been a week since I submitted my manuscript, but it still shows "in editorial review". However, it has already been sent for review. Why has the status not changed?

(0) 讚！ | 无冬小晨

Family members have encountered a situation where the submission has been stuck in editorial review for a long time. Has nobody reviewed it?

(11) 讚！ | 磕盐的修勾

Just submitted, the editor sent an email saying, "has been received and potential peer reviewers are now being invited to examine the study. Good luck!"

(3) 讚！ | 中一区

In the European and American circles, NAR still has a strong reputation. Some trendy labs are starting to focus on NC, but labs with profound background still lean more towards NAR

(23) 讚！ | 渡渡鸟

Unfortunately, this magazine is filled with a lot of superficial articles about databases and web servers

(0) 讚！ | ^只是朱颜改^

Papers on NAR basic research are so awesome. Almost all of them are hardcore experiments. The threshold is very high. Why are they classified as second-tier? Is it because there are too few people in China who can understand them?

(16) 讚！ | 首龚

Your evaluation is extremely inappropriate, representing a group of impatient domestic bureaucrats and pseudo-scientists. The job of scientists is to understand and summarize the laws of nature, not for the development of society and economy. The development of society and economy cannot do without the contributions of scientists, but scientists do not necessarily need to participate directly.

According to what you said, Newton, in addition to deducing the law of universal gravitation, would also have to build rockets for verification, and Einstein's theory of relativity would have to be discussed using a space-time spaceship. Absurd! Can't distinguish between science and technology!

(0) 讚！ | 仲元

The first draft was submitted to Nature, but it was rejected. It was then submitted to Nature Genetics, and after review, it was suggested to transfer to a smaller NC. Instead of transferring, it was submitted directly to NAR. Fed up with Nature's unprofessional editing, NAR is more reliable! At least they can resonate with you and understand the value of the experiment instead of just chasing citation potential!

(0) 讚！ | 仲元

A manuscript on multi-species analysis of RNA conservative functional domains. From submission to acceptance in four months, overall feeling is good

(1) 讚！ | 仲元

If JVI under ASM rejects a submission that is of decent quality, they will usually suggest transferring it to Microbiology Spectrum. As a result, the latter, due to having more reviews and fewer research papers in recent years, received a score of 9 for quality. Ironically, JVI, despite being a major journal, was placed in the second tier, while Microbiology Spectrum was placed in the top tier. This resulted in a comical situation where a submission rejected by a second-tier journal was picked up by a top-tier journal

(0) 讚！ | SUNYIFU

NAR industry publication is quite professional. It's very unprofessional to be classified as Zone Two. This publication should be in the top tier of Zone One, surpassing NC

(13) 讚！ | SUNYIFU

The gap between the two zones is sometimes very big. Most of the Chinese Academy of Sciences zones are very rational, but they do not perform well in niche journals, especially in top journals with extremely strict publication standards within the industry, which leads to serious underestimation of some journals

(0) 讚！ | double joker

Are they still in touch?

(0) 讚！ | double joker

At least I got a top, not bad

(0) 讚！ | double joker

Submitted for the first time but rejected , resubmitted after modification and supplementing experiments according to the comments, supplemented a large amount of data and finally resubmitted for revisions. NAR did not require major revisions, but only had 2 comments, and editors accepted the revised version directly

(15) 讚！ | 蓝魂之恋

Foreigners will ask you about the specific contributions of this article, not just the rankings

(0) 讚！ | 茜54655

Indeed, leave professional matters to professionals. There are no institutions like the Chinese Academy of Sciences journal classification system abroad. It's all about the reputation of researchers in the field. So your point is valid, but if you say that the Chinese Academy of Sciences is a professional institution, it shows that you are not very professional. Or perhaps you are one of them

(0) 讚！ | 茜54655

The quality of research should not be measured by the journal it is published in, as there is no comparability between journals. Evaluating a study should first consider what contributions it makes to society, the economy, and development. Articles that nobody reads or that are praised within a small circle are just a waste of money. Research held in high esteem by some may hold no meaning for others, and may have no value for society. It is better to not do it at all than to deceive oneself. Is an article considered impressive today just because it is published in a Tier 1 journal? Will the same article be considered worthless tomorrow if it is published in a Tier 4 journal? Return to the essence of academia, focus on the content of research, and do not overly expect fame and fortune from a journal's tier or impact factor. Since a journal carries such influence in Europe and America, why bother about its tier domestically? Allow different voices and perspectives, let professionals handle professional matters, and the tier system of the Chinese Academy of Sciences is the result of comprehensive assessment and thus has its validity

(15) 讚！ | LUK_USA

Put NAR into Tier 2? People in this country really don't understand science. Or are they just influenced by the twisted atmosphere of CNS? In Europe and America, one can obtain a faculty position onsite in non-hot basic research areas of NAR with just two papers. I'm afraid two NC papers won't cut it

(23) 讚！ | Yeast

Could I ask about your progress? I'd like to refer to the timeline

(0) 讚！ | 千花燕丽