Just submitted the manuscript 3 days ago, currently it is still in the status of EO: Editor office, under review, not sure how long it will take to be sent out for external review

(0) 讚！ | 千柳baby

Magazines with high impact factors and a majority of Chinese articles are often seen as low-quality publications. This magazine falls into both categories. As for the rest, you can figure it out.

(30) 讚！ | luofeiyu

It should be soon. The submission process is always somewhat tedious.

(1) 讚！ | yy12

I submitted it on July 31st, and until now, the Editor-in-Chief is still performing initial assessment. I don't know how long I have to wait.

(0) 讚！ | 顺其自然毛毛龙

2022-7-20 : EO: Not Assigned   Editorial office checking submission
2022-7-22 : EO: Editorial Office,   Editor-in-Chief performing initial assessment
2022-7-30 :EO: Editorial Office, Under review
~~~~Wish me good luck

Translation: 
2022-7-20: EO: Not Assigned - The editorial office is checking the submission.
2022-7-22: EO: Editorial Office - The Editor-in-Chief is performing an initial assessment.
2022-7-30: EO: Editorial Office - Under review.
~~~~Wish me good luck.

(4) 讚！ | yy12

Is "under review" referring to internal audit by the editor?

(0) 讚！ | 邻家小汐

Does "under review" mean internal audit by the editor?

(0) 讚！ | 邻家小汐

Trash magazine, I submitted it more than 50 days ago and haven't received any updates. I sent an email to inquire, but they directly rejected it after a few days without providing any feedback. Extremely irresponsible.

(4) 讚！ | tzz-小子

Aspirin

(0) 讚！ | 璃沙乐槐

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0 Focus research areas: Plant breeding Experience sharing: Strict requirements for completeness of stories

(0) 讚！ | 蒙德传禄

How long does the chief editor's initial review usually take?

(0) 讚！ | 拂柳乐欣

Given the diversity and complexity of biology, it is not a problem to have different results and publish them, because scientific research itself allows and encourages questioning, supplementing, and improving previous knowledge, and even overturning it. When writing a paper, we need to pay attention to two main points: accurately present the materials and methods and results, especially where they differ from others, emphasize them, and provide details; in the discussion section, do not avoid contradictions, compare points of similarity and difference with previous studies, and try to provide reasonable and effective explanations

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Highlight the innovativeness of your research, demonstrating distinctive features that set you apart from others. The magnitude of the difference is another issue; the key is to stand out, as long as there is a distinction, it is considered innovative

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How to highlight the innovation of an article in a discussion?

(0) 讚！ | 平原文波

How do I handle it when my current discussion conflicts with my previous published articles?

(0) 讚！ | 平原文波

rechazar

(0) 讚！ | little_foo

11.1 Reviews received - awaiting Associate Editor recommendation

This means that the reviews have been received and are currently awaiting the recommendation of the Associate Editor.

(0) 讚！ | little_foo

9.30 Submission, realized forgot to upload the Table (PBJ submission system does not have a Table option, need to paste it at the end of the Manuscript), wrote a letter to the editorial department, rejected by the author center on the same day. The efficiency is very high, remember to send it when the British people are working.
10.1 Re-submission
10.3 Editor-in-chief preliminary review
10.5 Under review
Currently waiting for the results, heard that PBJ has a low chance of being sent for review, hoping for a good result!

(6) 讚！ | little_foo

Overall, it took one year in total, with a total of four reviewers being changed.
In the first submission, it was directly rejected after review, but encouraged to resubmit. The experimental suggestions from two reviewers were included and the structure was optimized.
In the second submission, it was stated on the journal's homepage that it would be sent to the same reviewers, but possibly due to the editor's concerns about the additional experimental data from the first submission, it was sent to two different reviewers. One was positive and the other was negative. The editor rejected it again but encouraged resubmission.
The suggestions from the previous reviewer were quite logical and provided many references and experimental methods for reference. Therefore, many revisions were made in the third submission, and ultimately it was accepted with minor revisions.
Overall, the experience of submitting to this journal was quite frustrating, but some of the questions raised by the reviewers were indeed valid. Each time of resubmission, the editor also provided some suggestions for revisions. Perhaps this journal requires a very specific direction for better chances of acceptance.

(8) 讚！ | My bingo dog

Review speed: 1.0
Experience sharing: The editor of this journal is extremely irresponsible. After submitting the manuscript, the chief editor indicated that the evaluation process had begun. A week later, they provided feedback, saying it was interesting and encouraged resubmission as a letter. They also suggested submitting it to the same editor and reviewers if possible. We resubmitted in letter format, and a week later, the manuscript was rejected without being sent for review, citing reasons such as less data and detail, and lack of novelty

(0) 讚！ | 是迎蕊吖

The editor of this journal was extremely irresponsible. The submission showed that the editor in chief began to evaluate the manuscript, and a week later the reviewers’ comments were given as: interesting and encourage resubmit as a letter, and they said that it would be sent to the same editor and reviewer as much as possible. So, we resubmitted it in the form of letter. One week later, the manuscript was rejected without sending for review because of less data and detail, lack of novelty.

(7) 讚！ | mountain

Having trouble finding reviewers for the paper? It's been more than a week

(0) 讚！ | 魔都丽容

Very bad Journal

(1) 讚！ | Unknown

I feel like I was rejected without fully understanding the main idea of the article

(0) 讚！ | 玉卿姑娘

I feel that I have been rejected if I don’t understand the topic of the article...

(0) 讚！ | 大大