9.30 Submission, realized forgot to upload the Table (PBJ submission system does not have a Table option, need to paste it at the end of the Manuscript), wrote a letter to the editorial department, rejected by the author center on the same day. The efficiency is very high, remember to send it when the British people are working.
10.1 Re-submission
10.3 Editor-in-chief preliminary review
10.5 Under review
Currently waiting for the results, heard that PBJ has a low chance of being sent for review, hoping for a good result!

(6) 讚！ | little_foo

Overall, it took one year in total, with a total of four reviewers being changed.
In the first submission, it was directly rejected after review, but encouraged to resubmit. The experimental suggestions from two reviewers were included and the structure was optimized.
In the second submission, it was stated on the journal's homepage that it would be sent to the same reviewers, but possibly due to the editor's concerns about the additional experimental data from the first submission, it was sent to two different reviewers. One was positive and the other was negative. The editor rejected it again but encouraged resubmission.
The suggestions from the previous reviewer were quite logical and provided many references and experimental methods for reference. Therefore, many revisions were made in the third submission, and ultimately it was accepted with minor revisions.
Overall, the experience of submitting to this journal was quite frustrating, but some of the questions raised by the reviewers were indeed valid. Each time of resubmission, the editor also provided some suggestions for revisions. Perhaps this journal requires a very specific direction for better chances of acceptance.

(8) 讚！ | My bingo dog

Review speed: 1.0
Experience sharing: The editor of this journal is extremely irresponsible. After submitting the manuscript, the chief editor indicated that the evaluation process had begun. A week later, they provided feedback, saying it was interesting and encouraged resubmission as a letter. They also suggested submitting it to the same editor and reviewers if possible. We resubmitted in letter format, and a week later, the manuscript was rejected without being sent for review, citing reasons such as less data and detail, and lack of novelty

(0) 讚！ | 是迎蕊吖

The editor of this journal was extremely irresponsible. The submission showed that the editor in chief began to evaluate the manuscript, and a week later the reviewers’ comments were given as: interesting and encourage resubmit as a letter, and they said that it would be sent to the same editor and reviewer as much as possible. So, we resubmitted it in the form of letter. One week later, the manuscript was rejected without sending for review because of less data and detail, lack of novelty.

(7) 讚！ | mountain

Having trouble finding reviewers for the paper? It's been more than a week

(0) 讚！ | 魔都丽容

Very bad Journal

(1) 讚！ | Unknown

I feel like I was rejected without fully understanding the main idea of the article

(0) 讚！ | 玉卿姑娘

I feel that I have been rejected if I don’t understand the topic of the article...

(0) 讚！ | 大大

How long does it take to send for review? I recently submitted one too, it has been a week and it is still in the hands of the Editor-in-Chief

(0) 讚！ | 星熊元菱

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 75.0
Sharing experience: A bad magazine will eventually fall, with unprofessional editors

(0) 讚！ | 洗髓碧菡

Rotten journal, it will fall sooner or later, reviewer and its non-professional

(12) 讚！ | 灰喵侠

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: Editor-in-Chief performing initial assessment status has been for a few days, not sure what to expect

(0) 讚！ | 留云博简

After the first submission, review for 1.5 monthsThe result of reject and resubmit encourage, supplement the experiment for 3 months, resubmitted on August 2, and directly accepted on September 1.Feel the journal is generally more responsible,

(4) 讚！ | 小马

After the first submission, the review process took 1.5 months, and the result was reject and resubmit with encouragement. After supplementing with experiments for 3 months, the paper was resubmitted on August 2nd and accepted directly on September 1st. Overall, I feel that the journal is quite responsible

(0) 讚！ | Elvira Eva

Is this magazine subscription-based?

(0) 讚！ | 留云博简

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: Submitted manuscript was accepted after 7 months, first review returned after over 2 months, rejected and resubmitted, speculating that this journal does not require major revisions? Need to request originality in conclusions from work system, feel like there is not just a demand for research depth

(0) 讚！ | 北陆若溪

Plant Metabolism Regulation

(0) 讚！ | 晨风瑶瑾

I have resubmitted it a week ago but it still shows as not assigned

(0) 讚！ | 无相依白

After re-submitting to this journal, it has been showing "Reviewers selected" for several days. When will it be reviewed? Has anyone experienced this situation before?

(0) 讚！ | 晨风瑶瑾

Submission acceptance rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: High rejection rate, high requirements for innovation, work must be completed

(0) 讚！ | 乐心baby

Where did it go later? 
Agricultural Science Institute, published on Jan 2, 2017::Research direction: Plant Genetic Engineering;; Acceptance rate: about 25% Review time: about 1 month. Submitted one in December, the status changed to Associate Editor assigned - awaiting reviewer selection, should have passed the initial review, getting ready to select reviewers. But today, saw that it was rejected! Confused and frustrated!

(0) 讚！ | 南烟少爷

Just got a paper accepted after half a year of back and forth. Finally accepted, with careful revisions and additional experiments based on the reviewer's suggestions, it still has a good chance!

(0) 讚！ | 良策小可爱

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: Submitted an article in December, the status changed to "Associate Editor assigned - awaiting reviewer selection" which should mean that the initial review has passed, and they were preparing to select reviewers. But today, I saw that it was rejected! Confused and depressed!

(0) 讚！ | 法慧志信

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: In 2014, the work on the discovery of the maize embryo-specific promoter system was accepted on the first review very quickly, with review comments received within 2 weeks. After making major revisions and adding an experiment, the paper was accepted. The lab later submitted 2 papers which were both rejected. Recently, another paper was submitted and is currently under review. Looking forward to good results for the upcoming year! The focus is on practical applications, but novelty is also highlighted. It is considered a prestigious journal in the field of plant biotechnology

(0) 讚！ | 法慧志信

Overall, the journal reviewers are very responsible, the quality of journal and IF are also increasing year by year, and it is one of the few high-level journals in the field of plant technology.

(22) 讚！ | keqingbo@hotmail.com