| 期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱 | PLANTA LetPub Score 6.8
50 ratings
Rate
Reputation 7.6 Influence 5.8 Speed 8.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 期刊簡稱 | PLANTA | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ISSN | 0032-0935 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| E-ISSN | 1432-2048 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| h-index | 142 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| 自引率 (2023-2024) | 2.80%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| 官方網站 | https://www.springer.com/425 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 在線稿件提交 | https://www.editorialmanager.com/plaa | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 開放訪問 | No | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 出版商 | Springer Berlin Heidelberg | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 主題領域 | 生物 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 出版國/地區 | GERMANY | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 發行頻率 | 月刊 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 創刊年 | 1925 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 每年文章數 | 286每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 黃金OA百分比 | 19.53% | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q1
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| 索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0032-0935%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: About 2.3 month(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: About 37.5% | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| *所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| |
| 首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
| [PLANTA] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
| 作者: 长拳隽美 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2016-02-15 11:04:28 評論於 Submitted on December 31, 2015, returned for minor revisions on February 4, 2016, revised on February 11, 2016, and accepted on February 13, 2016 |
| 作者: 长拳隽美 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2016-02-15 09:06:08 評論於 Submitted on December 31, 2015, revised on February 4, 2016 for minor corrections, further revised on February 11, 2016, and accepted on February 13, 2016 |
| 作者: 长拳隽美 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2015-12-09 20:35:47 評論於 Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0 Experience sharing: Submitted an article on October 28, 2015, received minor revisions on December 1, regarding three words, accepted on December 9. This was my first time submitting an article and everything went so smoothly |
| 作者: Winfred Vogt 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2015-06-03 21:52:44 評論於 Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 5.0 Experience sharing: I just submitted one, and the submission number in June has reached over 500. It seems difficult to get accepted based on the ratio |
| 作者: 凌霄高洁 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2014-10-08 11:32:07 評論於 Submission Acceptance Rate: 25.0 Experience Sharing: As of October, Planta has received over 700 submissions, with an acceptance rate of only 25% based on an annual acceptance of 214 submissions. This means that this journal is relatively difficult to be published in |
| 作者: 凌霄高洁 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2014-08-06 19:28:47 評論於 Do you still want to subscribe to this magazine now? Are you looking for something affordable, high quality, or in between? |
| 作者: 凌霄高洁 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2014-04-25 14:40:45 評論於 The review process is too slow! |
| 作者: 凌霄高洁 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2014-03-11 16:28:51 評論於 Chinese scientists are so bad, damn it, they're really not good people. Don't let them be the reviewers, for God's sake! |
| 作者: 凌霄高洁 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2014-02-12 17:25:53 評論於 Review Speed: 2.0 | Submission Acceptance Rate: 50.0 Experience Sharing: The paper I published is about proteomics. It was submitted on October 18, 2013, and officially accepted on February 4, 2014, after 4 rounds of revisions. The first review took 1.5 months, the second and third reviews took 1 month each, and there were only 2 days between the third and fourth reviews. The editor was very responsible, with strict formatting requirements, and could identify even the smallest issues |
| 作者: 凌霄高洁 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2013-09-26 11:46:13 評論於 Those stupid people from the Chinese Academy of Sciences divided it into three zones. It's not an authoritative journal, not an important journal. Plant, such a classic magazine. Me !!!! |
| 作者: 凌霄高洁 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2013-08-09 17:57:02 評論於 Review Speed: 1.0 Experience Sharing: Submitted in 2013, first review took 3 weeks; after revision, accepted in 2 weeks; then, Online in half a month. Innovation is quite important, and the article quality requirements are also quite high. Of course, the most important thing is the approval of the reviewers |
| 作者: 无妄玉惠 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2013-07-26 17:27:22 評論於 The magazine is very good, the response speed is very fast, and it was officially accepted in just over a month. They have specific requirements for originality in articles and have high standards for English formatting, but they are not nit-picky, and the editors are very reasonable |
| 作者: 匿名 領域: 生命科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 撰寫評論 |
2013-07-26 11:41:00 評論於 Magazine is very good, the response speed is very fast, and it was officially received in more than a month.There are requirements for the new ideas of the article, and the English format is more demanding, but it is not nitpicking, and the editing is very reasonable. |
| 作者: 凌霄高洁 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2013-06-22 22:21:28 評論於 Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0 Experience sharing: This journal is very classic, the editors are very responsible and rigorous. There is a certain requirement for innovation in papers |
| 作者: 金蛇盼山 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2013-04-12 16:02:11 評論於 Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0 Experience sharing: Based on the situation in our laboratory, manuscripts are usually accepted after minor revisions, without requiring too much experimental data, but the story must be complete. For example, gene cloning and then gene identification |
| 作者: 匿名 領域: 生命科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 撰寫評論 |
2013-04-12 10:30:00 評論於 According to the situation of our laboratory, it is usually received after minor repairs. It does not require much experimental data, but the story should be complete.For example, map clones, and then identify a gene. |
| 作者: 凌霄高洁 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2012-12-20 19:27:28 評論於 To conduct research and innovation is paramount |
| 作者: 北陆曜瑞 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2012-08-08 15:08:16 評論於 Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0 Experience sharing: Planta is an SCI journal under Springer, with two centers globally accepting submissions: Heidelberg, Germany, and the United States. The review speed is relatively fast, around 1 month. The editorial department will ask the author to do a major revision and respond to the reviewers' comments point by point, then return the revised manuscript to the editorial department. Approximately 15 days later, minor revision suggestions will be received, and the manuscript should be revised according to the reviewers' suggestions while explaining the issues raised. It can be resubmitted back to the editorial department (submitted online), and within a few days, an acceptance email can be received |
| 作者: 凌霄高洁 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2012-07-01 10:12:16 評論於 The plant is a authoritative journal. The 2011 IF is 3 points. Several other not-so-good magazines like Pant Cell Physiology and JB have risen to around 5 points! |
| 作者: 凌霄高洁 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2012-06-28 13:44:07 評論於 I don't know how to submit a paper to the Planta journal. Can someone help me, please? Thank you |
| 作者: 凌霄高洁 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2012-03-17 08:04:23 評論於 I have submitted one to this journal. I hope that everything goes well |
| 作者: 江南芃芃 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2012-02-19 16:39:01 評論於 Review speed: 3.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0 Experience sharing: The journal is very rigorous, feeling higher requirements than JEB and PMB, but the Impact Factor has been decreasing recently, I do not know if it is due to the strict requirements. My article was revised three times, but the reviewer's comments could not be completed, so it was directly rejected. The requirements for experiments and innovation points are very high, so if you are eager to graduate, be cautious about submitting because they will repeatedly revise, which takes a lot of time. Of course, my research is indeed shallow, so it was rejected! |
| 作者: 匿名 領域: 生命科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 撰寫評論 |
2012-02-19 09:42:00 評論於 Magazine is very rigorous and feels better thanJEB, PMB requirements are still high, but IF has been falling recently, I don't know if it is strict.My article was overhauled 3 times. Later, the reviewer could not complete the comments, and directly rejected the manuscript. The experiment and the innovation point are very demanding. If the person who is eager to graduate is cautious, because he will repeatedly and repeatedly modify it, it is very expensive.Time, of course, my research is superficial, so I was rejected! |
| 作者: 匿名 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 撰寫評論 |
2011-08-18 22:30:00 評論於 Journal Homepage URL: http://www.springer.com/life+sciences/plant+sciences/journal/425 |
| 作者: 北国爱乐 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2011-06-29 08:02:22 評論於 Research Focus: Botany |
| 首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
Contact us