Hello, may I ask how long it takes to assign an editor after you submit your contribution?

(0) 讚！ | 不会取名

Who said this is a water journal? It's deceiving. I really thought it was a good submission, thinking I could easily get accepted. But it turns out I had to find three reviewers, one rejected it, and two suggested major revisions, but with high acceptance rates. Currently, I am in the process of making the major revisions, hoping for a good outcome. The impact factor is a bit far-fetched, but the review speed of one month is acceptable. However, the publication fee is indeed expensive. Good luck.

(1) 讚！ | 秋刀鱼

Later, three rounds of review were initiated, with only one person per round, and it was not until late January, about 8 months later, that it was finally accepted. They said this journal was easy to get published in, but in reality, it was not. Later, I noticed that some of the reviewers were foreigners, including experts in the field.

(0) 讚！ | goodluckQ

2022.12.25 Submission
2023.01.10 Reviewer's comments returned
2023.01.22 Submission of reviewer's comments response
2023.01.24 Accepted
2023.02.10 Published
The review speed is relatively fast.

(0) 讚！ | lf

2022.12.5 - Submitted initial draft
2023.1.08/1.18 - Received review comments
2023.1.24 - Review experts completed the review
2023.1.27 - Accepted
Still waiting for online publication
Overall, the review process and acceptance speed were fast. The only downside was the expensive publication fee. Overall, the submission experience was good.

(3) 讚！ | undefined

A complete mess with water. All kinds of blacklists have been arranged.

(3) 讚！ | David zhou

Wrote a methodological article on the detection of a certain microorganism using CRISPR-Cas12. The structure is quite simple, originally intended for a master's student's graduation. The main work was completed in three months. The master's student procrastinated for a whole year and didn't write, so I reluctantly wrote it myself for six months. Initially, I submitted to a few low impact factor journals, but they were all rejected. After organizing the text properly, I submitted to Microbiology Spectrum, hoping to be recommended for transfer. Unexpectedly, it went for peer review. Although the reviewer's comments were not very positive, I spent six months diligently deepening the content of the paper, significantly improving its quality. After making the revisions, it was rejected immediately because during this revision process, the journal had accepted another similar article. Feeling disheartened, and with a job change, making it inconvenient to continue with additional experiments, I decided to submit it here.

(1) 讚！ | 桑桑菌

One month has passed, and the current impact factor is 4.7+. It is expected that the impact factor for June's statistics should be around 6.1.

(0) 讚！ | Arlin

This journal is okay, not too low-quality. The other series of Frontiers are even lower-quality.

(0) 讚！ | MMMMMeng啊

Did they all get caught?

(0) 讚！ | 罗汉秋荣

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and use ":" as the heading

(0) 讚！ | 一吃就胖小绮南

The quality of the journals under Frontiers is becoming more and more like MDPI. It is astonishing that they are now listed as second-tier journals. I cannot understand the operation of the Chinese Academy of Sciences' journal ranking system.

(7) 讚！ | 周易water

Is this directed at harvesting China's big water journals in the top of the second district? The classification of the Chinese Academy of Sciences allows everyone to have a share, not bad, not bad!

(40) 讚！ | 林夕

Tell a scary story, there are only ten days left until the end of the year. The current impact factor is around 4.3. Last year, there were over 3900 submissions, and this year it's almost 5000. The expansion rate of submissions is too fast...

(5) 讚！ | Arlin

Does this gossip magazine even care about the quality of the articles?

(0) 讚！ | song

Criticized, this is just a superficial magazine. The writing level can only be described as garbage. As far as I know, many domestic universities have included it in the list of non-reward blacklists.

(0) 讚！ | song

This is originally a water magazine...

(0) 讚！ | song

This kind of spam magazine has also become top. Funny.

(1) 讚！ | song

You can email the magazine to inquire, but it feels highly likely that you will be rejected.

(0) 讚！ | 尽快投稿

22.8.22 Submission
22.9.18 Minor revisions by first reviewer
22.9.27 Rejected by second reviewer, delayed for two months, always an independent review
11.26 Sent an email to inquire
11.28 Received a reply stating that a third reviewer was found
22.12.7 Rejected by third reviewer, editorial suggestion to withdraw the submission.

(1) 讚！ | 尽快投稿

How long did it take you to find a reviewer?

(0) 讚！ | 绿禾

Why is this?

(0) 讚！ | 诗晴来了

With this condition

(0) 讚！ | 诗晴来了

23000RMB

(0) 讚！ | 北陆硕阳

Submitted at the end of August, hired at the end of November, published this month. It is estimated that the number of submissions this year will be around 5000 articles.

(0) 讚！ | Arlin