Mendel randomization + basic experimental verification, submitted on January 8th, revised on February 22nd, reviewed by two reviewers, both major revisions, mainly methodological issues, allowed 14 days for revisions, returned on March 1st, accepted on March 10th. Published on March 27th.

(0) 讚！ | 曲水流觞

Submission rejected within 1 day, reason being that the editorial department of "Frontiers in Immunology" has already rejected the manuscript. Reason: The manuscript has issues related to research integrity policies, journal guidelines, or any other important editorial matters, which prevent further review or publication. They also provided a website for appeals. 

The rejection of my submission is because my affiliation is a hospital? 
Can I still submit my manuscript after making modifications according to the guidelines?

(0) 讚！ | fxwl

On the first day of submission, the magazine directly rejected the submission because the editorial department of "Frontiers in Immunology" had already rejected the manuscript. The reason is: This manuscript has issues related to research integrity policies, journal guidelines, or other important editorial matters, which prevent it from being reviewed or published. They also provided a website for appeals, meaning that you can appeal the decision.

As for whether you can resubmit the revised manuscript, it would depend on the specific policies of the magazine. You may need to contact the editorial department for further clarification.

(0) 讚！ | fxwl

Damn it, it's a real rip-off. They treat me like a cutting board and themselves like the fish.

(0) 讚！ | fxwl

Submitted, hoping yet fearing disappointment, a continuous battle between pessimism and optimism.

(0) 讚！ | fxwl

How long have you been online?

(0) 讚！ | duer494

How much of a discount is being offered?

(0) 讚！ | grinning

After the submission, it was promised that the results would be provided within ten days. However, two additional emails were sent requesting an extra five days (possibly due to Christmas). Now, it has been two weeks since the deadline for the second email extension, and there has been no progress. I am now considering sending an email to inquire about the progress. Should I send it to the editor in charge or someone else?

(0) 讚！ | Alienation

Submitted in November, revised in mid-December, with two rounds of revisions in between. The questions from the peer reviewers were very professional and the paper was accepted on January 12th.

(0) 讚！ | ddtwg

How long did the review take?

(0) 讚！ | grinning

Long-term reviewing has earned me 12,000 points, with a 60% discount, which amounts to a 40% off. If you are interested in submitting a manuscript, feel free to communicate with me.

(0) 讚！ | Kevin Cui

I was just about to send a reminder email for the manuscript, and I received an email saying that a reviewer has been assigned.

(0) 讚！ | Alienation

Being able to reach the review stage already increases the success rate by half, at least there are reviewers providing feedback.

(0) 讚！ | tuzi520

After paying the layout fee, we should quickly move on to the proof stage.

(0) 讚！ | tuzi520

It has been over 20 days EA.

(0) 讚！ | 好好学习的医学僧

Have editors not been assigned during the EA stage?

(0) 讚！ | 小子

It's been almost 20 days, I'm preparing to follow up.

(0) 讚！ | Alienation

Mini is at level 1-2 in proficiency.

(0) 讚！ | 小子

I have also stopped for more than 10 days.

(0) 讚！ | 好好学习的医学僧

Is the mini-review worth investing in?

(0) 讚！ | 好好学习的医学僧

The payment can be quickly verified after it is made.

(0) 讚！ | tuzi520

I submitted a review and it has been sitting in the editorial office for 12 days.

(0) 讚！ | 小子

An accepted mini-review on October 16th still hasn't been published, and it's already December.

(0) 讚！ | 小子

I have been stuck at EA for ten days, what should I do?

(0) 讚！ | Alienation

After losing one reviewer, may I ask how things are going? Do we need to wait for that reviewer to respond, or do we need to find another reviewer?

(0) 讚！ | grinning