I submitted it on the evening of the 23rd and it is still under review.

(0) 讚！ | 姜朴一

Hey buddy, I just received the BV, but it's still under review. Where can I see the information of the reviewer?

(0) 讚！ | carryfirey

May 4th first submission
May 8th BV
June 22nd rejected and resubmitted
August 19th revised and resubmitted for the second time
August 31st BV
September 22nd accepted

(0) 讚！ | 裴一飞

Accepted on September 22nd. It is recommended that everyone carefully revise their papers during the major revision process, fully addressing each reviewer's comments. If there is not enough space to explain certain content, it can be included in an appendix. I did it this way, comparing various indicators and their strengths and weaknesses, as well as additional indicators in the appendix. This way, reviewers will not reject the paper based on some indicators being good and others being poor, as different indicators have different scenarios and strengths. 
Wishing everyone success in submitting and being accepted for publication. 
Also, wishing myself success in finding a job.

(0) 讚！ | 裴一飞

September 22, 2026, 9:30 pm, already submitted.

(0) 讚！ | Zoey

Please record:
9.22, 9:30 pm, already cast.

(0) 讚！ | Zoey

2026.09.20 Rejected and resubmitted, with 10 questions from 2 reviewers. After reviewing, it seems that additional experiments need to be conducted. Reviewer 1 also suggested adding some supplementary references. However, it seems that there is no time limit for resubmission to this journal.

(0) 讚！ | kkk222iu

Admiration.

(0) 讚！ | 妄图成上

Submission on 6.5, BV on 6.11, first review on 7.22 allows resubmission after revision; resubmitted on 8.29, not BV on 9.4.

(0) 讚！ | LPYLPY

Submission on June 25th.
Accepted on August 26th.
No modifications.

(0) 讚！ | sboyer

Please delete if written incorrectly.

(0) 讚！ | sboyer

Together we strive, brother.

(0) 讚！ | zzc

A little afraid of being rejected because I feel that the innovation point and dataset are too simple.

(0) 讚！ | zzc

Because the teacher reimbursed, so submitted to this journal. Submitted on 8.25, it was under review the same day. Received an email from the editorial office on 9.3, with information about the reviewers (not very clear as it was the first submission).

(0) 讚！ | zzc

7.16 submit
7.22 rejection, supplementary materials
7.23 resubmit
8.12 best video
9.3 rejection and resubmission, 2 reviewers

(0) 讚！ | 我

Squatting

(0) 讚！ | lhj8866

No matter how I submit my essay, it never gets accepted. Just here to vent a little. Submitted on September 1st.

(0) 讚！ | sdp1

Interesting, I said there was no BV a little after 1 o'clock in the afternoon, and received BV at 7 o'clock.

(0) 讚！ | 裴一飞

Why is the second BV so slow? Is it normal?
First submission on May 4th
BV on May 8th
Reject and resubmit on June 22nd
Second submission completed on August 19th
It's already August 31st and still no BV.

(0) 讚！ | 裴一飞

My senior brother is a teacher at a vocational college. He applied to Applied Sciences and was rejected. I think he was rejected because the platform is not good. They didn't provide any specific feedback, just the standard response: "We regret to inform you that we will not be processing your submission further. Submissions sent for peer-review are selected based on discipline, novelty and general significance, in addition to the usual criteria for publication in scholarly journals. Therefore, our decision does not necessarily reflect the quality of your work." Does IEEE Access care about the platform?

(0) 讚！ | JYDDD

I invested on 8.18 and immediately sent the UR, but I still haven't received the best video by the 25th.

(0) 讚！ | yxy要晒太阳

Brother, I encountered the same problem in another 4th district water journal. The article has been revised twice in four months, with two approvals, but one with a bunch of AI opinions. The editor probably doesn't understand, and refused to make further revisions when they saw that it needed major changes. I just wrote an appeal letter and even paid for an AI detection report. The main issue is that when I used GPT to scan my own article, the suggestions were exactly the same as those made by the reviewers, which is absurd. Each round they come up with different problems, three times they made me change the titles of the article three times, which were contradictory. There are also many demands for details, or asking me to do countless experiments.

(0) 讚！ | Yi Huang

How long does it take from early access to official release?

(0) 讚！ | tfr06

On July 23, 26, received
On August 13, 26, Best video

(0) 讚！ | 我

I heard that ACCESS has been very slow recently, anyway, it's just a casual article, I'll submit it first and see. 
Submitted on August 1, 2026, under review the same day. 
On August 10, 2026, assigned an Administrator and received an email about the best video.

(0) 讚！ | kkk222iu