I didn't record a video. It shouldn't be necessary.

(0) 讚！ | DannieW

Sharing submission experience in the field of computer vision:

2025.6.10 Submitted
2025.6.10 Under Review
2025.6.16 Best Video
2025.7.17 Review completed, 2 reviewers, 9 comments (5+4)
2025.8.06 Resubmit
2025.8.06 Under Review
2025.8.12 Best Video
2025.8.24 Review completed, 2 reviewers, 6 comments (1+5)
2025.8.31 Resubmit
2025.8.31 Under Review
2025.9.4 Best Video
2025.9.15 Accepted, 2 reviewers, 1 comment (1+0), corrected grammar issues

(0) 讚！ | yangaaaaa

Hello, is it necessary to record the video?

(0) 讚！ | xkc

7.21 submission
7.25 Bv
9.2 inquire editor
9.8 reply (let wait)
Originally planned to submit an open source quickly, and then apply for a scholarship, but this hope is now dashed.

(0) 讚！ | 跃隼

7.17 First submission
7.23 bv
8.21 Rejection and resubmission, three reviewers
9.3 Second submission
9.8 bv

(0) 讚！ | DannieW

I finished writing in December of the 24th year. 
When I submitted it to the school, the teacher kept making revisions until June when I finally started submitting it. 
The teacher submitted it to one journal and it was rejected immediately. 
Originally, I was going to submit to MDPI Sustainability, but I mistakenly selected a different journal using the wrong template. It was obvious that it would be rejected as soon as they opened the document and saw the wrong journal name. 
I then submitted to MDPI Sustainability again, but this article had already been rejected by MDPI, so it was predictable that it would be rejected again. 
Next, I submitted to PLoS ONE, and they asked me to revise the format. When I resubmitted, I deleted the other authors from the first submission because everyone receives an email notification when a submission is made, and I felt embarrassed. The editor then requested proof of permission from all authors. I found it too troublesome and decided not to submit to that journal. 
I then submitted to a math journal recommended by the teacher, but it was completely unrelated to my paper and was rejected. 
I wasted so much time. I wasted half a year. 
Finally, I submitted to IEEE.

(0) 讚！ | lili

New submission from July 2, 2025

Submission date
July 8, 2025

External review on July 15, 2025
Rejection for major revision on August 16, 2025
Resubmission on August 21, 2025
Submission date
September 9, 2025
Rejection date from editorial office on August 17, 2025

Acceptance date from editorial office on September 9, 2025

(0) 讚！ | lili

It has been nearly two months since I reapplied, but still no news.

(0) 讚！ | 飞飞

8.21 submission
8.27 additional information
9.1 BV

(0) 讚！ | 逍遥哥哥123

Rejection and resubmission on August 26th, resubmission on September 2nd.

(0) 讚！ | LPYLPY

Does anyone know if it is possible to be admitted to a master's program without a supervisor's funding? 
8-18 submission
8-22 ask authors for self-introduction
8-28 BV

(0) 讚！ | 抒同

Is there a follow-up to this? I am also curious and seeking guidance.

(0) 讚！ | alexzhang_141

March 15, 2025 Best Video

(0) 讚！ | kk1ky

2025.3.5 Submission
2025.3.5 Best Video
2025.4.11 Actively requested an update on submission.
2025.4.15 Responded to the request for an update. Not recommended to rush the submission.
2025.5.20 Received decision email - rejection but encouraged to resubmit (a nice 520 gift). Feedback from three reviewers: 15 comments, 9 comments, 4 comments.
Based on the feedback, redesigned, supplemented experiments, modified content, and made extensive revisions for 2 months.
2025.7.20 After two months, received a reminder email from IEEE Access.
2025.7.26 Discovered issues with cross-references on the same day as submission.
2025.7.26 Sent an email inquiring about how to address the issues.
2025.7.28 Received a rejection email for the submission.
2025.7.29 Resubmitted.
2025.8.5 Best Video (which I didn't even get to see).
2025.8.17 Accepted. Reviewer 1 and Reviewer 2 had no comments, did not see comments from Reviewer 3, so uploaded the final draft on the same day. Authorship confirmed.
2025.8.18 Paid the fee.
2025.8.20 Received a message about ORCID, early ACCESS.
2025.8.21 Received congratulations email from IEEE Access.
2025.8.24 Received confirmation email for paper publication layout from corresponding author.

(0) 讚！ | kk1ky

Nuclear power equipment + deep learning
Submitted on 25.8.20.

(0) 讚！ | Nicholas.ErGouZ

A fast retrieval week.

(0) 讚！ | 马大叔

I am speechless, just like you.

(0) 讚！ | 漫江芦苇

Can I submit again after being rejected?

(0) 讚！ | 漫江芦苇

Can I still submit my work after being rejected?

(0) 讚！ | 漫江芦苇

I also submitted on 7.15, received BV on 7.22, and it is still under review. I also wonder why the process is so slow now.

(0) 讚！ | yanwurui

7.15 submitted, 7.21 journal replied, no updates yet, reminding for submission on 8.19. Are open-access journals always this slow?

(0) 讚！ | LPYLPY

Submission on August 1st, UR on the same day, Administrator email arranged, it has been half a month and I still haven't received the bv email, the status of the submission is still UR. Does this mean it has been automatically rejected?

(0) 讚！ | Qiwei1113

Asked about the progress of the review, the response was that it is still under review, and there has been no news so far. Is the review period always this long now?

(0) 讚！ | 好运123321

Did you follow up on the submission? I am also waiting anxiously. Have you received any updates?

(0) 讚！ | duyun0121

Fake money exchanged by buddy?

(0) 讚！ | Nicholas.ErGouZ