期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱![]() | IEEE Access LetPub Score 7.4
136 ratings
Rate
Reputation 6.7 Influence 7.2 Speed 7.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
期刊簡稱 | IEEE ACCESS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 2169-3536 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 56 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
自引率 (2023-2024) | 11.80%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
官方網站 | https://ieeeaccess.ieee.org/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
在線稿件提交 | https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/ieee-access | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
開放訪問 | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
出版商 | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
主題領域 | COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMSENGIN | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
出版國/地區 | UNITED STATES | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
發行頻率 | 継続刊行 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
創刊年 | 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
每年文章數 | 10276每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
黃金OA百分比 | 97.94% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
OA Related Info![]() | APC: Yes( USD1995; ) APC waiver:Check Notes Other charges: No Keywords: communications、engineered materials、engineering、manufacturing Useful LinksAims & ScopeAuthor InstructionsEditorial BoardAnonymous peer review | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q2
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=2169-3536%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: 6 weeks | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
*所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 |
|
首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
[IEEE Access] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
作者: 无敌哥 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 直接被接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-12 15:12:55 評論於 How long did it take for you to be hired? ![]() ![]() |
作者: lzz 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-09 15:28:24 評論於 I would like to ask how long it takes for SCI to be indexed after acceptance? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 大肠 領域: 社会学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-09 15:01:29 評論於 On June 6th at 5 o'clock, I submitted my application. On June 6th, after having dinner, it went under review. I see everyone has the "best video" option... Why don't I have this option? How long does the external review usually take? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 阳光小鱼 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-08 10:28:04 評論於 What's going on? Why are we still being rejected even though we've come this far, and access is becoming more difficult? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 小十四 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-07 11:23:23 評論於 5.14 Rejected, with two reviewers. The first reviewer pointed out some small formatting errors, while the second reviewer requested additional innovative content. 5.17 Resubmission. 5.21 Rejected by the editor using a template, stating that they will not accept this article again. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 啥也不好起 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-06 11:33:43 評論於 It seems like everything is gone after the system update. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 阳光小鱼 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-05 22:39:04 評論於 My EIC row is also missing, have you found the reason? Does the external audit result come out after it disappears? ![]() ![]() |
作者: づRoyal々权 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-01 21:59:51 評論於 How long does it take for an accepted paper to be searchable on Web of Science? ![]() ![]() |
作者: 啥也不好起 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-05-27 12:02:30 評論於 3.24 submission 4.2 error in document, correction resubmitted 4.9 BV 5.5 reminder for submission 5.5 rejection, resubmit 5.9 resubmission 5.12 error in document, returned for resubmission 5.16 BV 5.26 reminder template reply under review Today when I checked the S1 system, why is the EIC line missing directly, only ADM is there, what is going on, please explain. ![]() ![]() |
作者: qiaolk 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-05-15 10:41:16 評論於 1.3 Submission 1.8 BV 2.13 Reply (encouraging resubmission after rejection, 2 reviewers: 11+5) 3.7 Resubmission 3.17 BV (no change in editor-in-chief, change in reviewers) 4.14 Reply (accepted after minor revisions) 4.15 Final submission 4.19 Accepted ![]() ![]() |
作者: SalSen 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-05-13 14:10:37 評論於 5.7 Submission 5.12 Best Video ![]() ![]() |
作者: 秋色寒烟 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-05-06 17:51:00 評論於 5.1 Submission 5.6 best video ![]() ![]() |
作者: dianzixinxi 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2025-04-21 09:39:04 評論於 The submission was made on February 4th, and the first review was rejected and resubmitted on April 21st, taking two and a half months, which is relatively slow. ![]() ![]() |
作者: huang bob 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-04-20 21:25:40 評論於 Received the offer letter on April 20, 2025. Unfortunately, I missed the deadline for submission this year, so graduation will be postponed. ![]() ![]() |
作者: ROYLLL 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-04-14 21:37:04 評論於 2024.10.15 Submit 2024.10.23 Best Video Award 2025.1.7 Minor revisions, 4 reviewers, all minor issues 2025.1.12 Resubmit 2025.1.21 Best Video Award 2025.4.9 Accepted, one reviewer suggested adding some theory 2025.4.12 Revised, submitted Final Files, completed publication agreement, confirmed author identity Finally accepted after half a year, I usually only receive feedback every two to three months, so exhausting. Although it dropped to the 4th tier, it doesn't affect my graduation at all, haha. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 会肘击的劳达 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 5.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-04-13 11:31:06 評論於 Submitted on November 23, 2024 Feedback returned on December 23, 2024 Resubmitted on February 10, 2025 Directly hired on April 2, 2025 ![]() ![]() |
作者: 小十四 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-04-07 09:55:44 評論於 3.10 Inappropriate materials 3.12 Resubmit 3.21 Best video 4.5 Rejected but encouraged to resubmit (10 comments from two reviewers) 4.6 Resubmit ![]() ![]() |
作者: lucky_bingbing 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-04-03 13:26:07 評論於 请提供更多上下文信息。这段话看起来是一个单词的重复,没有明确的含义。 ![]() ![]() |
作者: 郭郭郭11 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-04-02 16:47:33 評論於 How do I withdraw my submission? ![]() ![]() |
作者: lucky_bingbing 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-04-02 16:07:58 評論於 How can we tell if the original reviewer is still the same? We can't see the reviewer on the webpage, only the EIC and ADM have changed. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 三月橙 領域: 综合性期刊 審稿時間: 6.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2025-04-02 12:15:45 評論於 The paper was submitted at the end of October 2024, and the first round of comments was not received until January 2025. There were two reviewers, with Reviewer 1 asking 7 detailed questions and Reviewer 2 asking 3 simpler questions (such as adding references, adjusting formatting, and including an additional experiment). After revisions were made in February, the paper was resubmitted, only to be rejected in April. However, the first reviewer in the rejection letter expressed acceptance of the paper, while the second reviewer inexplicably provided four additional suggestions. It is frustrating that issues were not addressed in the initial review, causing a delay of nearly six months. It is truly exhausting. ![]() ![]() |
作者: huang bob 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-04-01 23:09:17 評論於 I sent an email to ADM the day before yesterday, and they replied to me the next day. ![]() ![]() |
作者: ka1995 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2025-04-01 12:30:25 評論於 Submitted: 2025-03-05 Best video BV: 2025-03-16 still waiting for review. (2025-04-02) ![]() ![]() |
作者: 米糖咖啡 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-31 10:07:56 評論於 How come ADM hasn't replied? They used to reply on the same day, but this time it's been two days and still no response, and their status hasn't changed either. ![]() ![]() |
作者: 晨起一杯茶 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 4.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-26 19:23:16 評論於 Submitted before the New Year, it was reviewed for two months, and two reviewers provided feedback. The issues were not significant, so I made positive revisions within a week and resubmitted. However, after waiting for over a month, the result was meaningless and they advised against resubmitting. It was a waste of time and energy. It's really disappointing, I will switch to a different journal. ![]() ![]() |
首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 下一頁 末頁 (頁 |
Contact us