3.27 major revision
4.7 under review
4.8 rrc
4.12 accept

(0) 讚！ | 洛芷江

I forgot that when submitting the article, it seems that only a rough direction was selected, and the editors were assigned randomly.

(0) 讚！ | 洛芷江

Which editor did you choose?

(0) 讚！ | Roche

2.24 major revision
3.17 resubmit
3.21 Required Reviews Completed

(0) 讚！ | 洛芷江

2026.03.03 with editor
2026.03.06 with editor
2026.03.12 under review

(0) 讚！ | 求Accept~

2026.03.06 Submitted to Journal
2026.03.06 With Editor

(0) 讚！ | TSUCCHI

2026.02.05 with editor
2026.02.07 with editor
2026.02.17 under review
2026.02.20 rrc
2026.02.22 dip

(0) 讚！ | 洛芷江

We haven't had the nerve to rush yet, thinking that the issue of changing the format was fixed the same day. We thought the editor was pretty quick, but there has been no response since the 13th.

(0) 讚！ | Gaven

We also submitted our contribution on the 12th, then had a formatting issue fixed, and have been in the "waiting for editor" status since the 13th until now~

(0) 讚！ | Gaven

Has it been submitted for review?

(0) 讚！ | 张先森加油吖

Dec 02, 2025 submitted
Dec 03, 2025 With Editor
Dec 17 Sent a reminder, was told the manuscript is still with the editor in chief
Why is it taking so long????

(0) 讚！ | pom

Follow-up: Gathered reviewers and accepted one year later.

(0) 讚！ | zittty

Received at Editorial Office in mid-May
Major revisions in late September, two reviewers, two sets of review comments, we will return the revised manuscript in about a week
Accepted for publication at the end of October

It is important to find reviewers, so choose the field carefully when submitting
The speed of the editor I was assigned to is considered fast, but most of the time is spent on waiting for reviewer comments. If the reviewers are slow, it can take up to half a month. If the reviewers have not accepted the invitation or have not returned their comments, the editorial office will follow up or invite new reviewers around one month later
Although it was a major revision, there were no significant changes in research methods or article structure. In fact, I consider it a minor revision.

(0) 讚！ | vmz

2025.9.5 submit
2025.9.7 Template rejected (reason: out of scope) and suggested to submit to another journal.

(0) 讚！ | 卡皮巴拉~

Sent to three external reviewers, the feedback was very constructive and not harsh, which was very helpful. Unfortunately, the submission was still rejected. The time from submission to receiving feedback was exactly 8 weeks.

(0) 讚！ | lilalalalabo

What was the result in the end?

(0) 讚！ | 夕1

How to avoid pitfalls when editing is not your choice?

(0) 讚！ | Dr. Yiqi w

Hey bro, just wanted to ask if there are any edits that need to be avoided.

(0) 讚！ | LE

Please translate the following paragraph to English: 0706 accept

(1) 讚！ | 毕业快跑路

0706 submission
0707 Under Review inviting 11 reviewers, 1 accepted

(0) 讚！ | 拉比小白

The speed of this journal depends entirely on the editor.
If you encounter a tough editor, it may take two months to go online once...
And they are persistent in inviting the same group of reviewers...
It has been 10 months since the first review and still no response, really unlucky....

(0) 讚！ | sssssssy

0330 major revision;
0428 revision submitted;
0526 minor revision; (1 acceptance, 1 reviewer suggestion for experiment)
0607 revision submitted;
0608 under review (revised due to strong reviewer suggestion for additional comparative experiment)

(0) 讚！ | 毕业快跑路

2025.06.05 with editor
2025.06.09 under review
Eleven reviewers were invited at once, and six of them accepted.

(0) 讚！ | leere

Encountering difficulties in finding appropriate reviewers for the manuscript once again, the editor sent an email stating: Despite our best efforts, we were unable to obtain high-quality reviews for the manuscript. Regrettably, the feedback received from referees did not meet the standard necessary to make an informed editorial decision. In the interest of avoiding further delays in publication, we have made the decision to reject the manuscript. Despite inviting over 20 referees, many either declined to review or submitted reports that were inadequate for making an informed decision.

(0) 讚！ | 艾森伯格

On June 4th, due to the inability to find expert reviewers, the manuscript was rejected. Despite our best efforts, we were unable to obtain high-quality reviews for the manuscript. Regrettably, the feedback received from referees did not meet the standard necessary to make an informed editorial decision. In the interest of avoiding further delays in publication, we have made the decision to reject the manuscript. Despite inviting over 20 referees, many either declined to review or submitted reports that were inadequate for making an informed decision.

(0) 讚！ | 艾森伯格