Why is my status still "Editor Assigned" after a month?

(0) 讚！ | AlivGO

I have been Editor Assigned for over a month now.

(0) 讚！ | AlivGO

How long do you have to wait after the second review of the journal?

(0) 讚！ | 鹿鹿鹿k

Thank you, then I'll just wait.

(0) 讚！ | 木青流云

Submit for review in about two and a half months.

(0) 讚！ | kk-k

How long does it take for you to review? It's been almost a month and it's still "Editor Assigned".

(0) 讚！ | 木青流云

This journal is not bad, it's not too trashy either ??, it's considered average in the second division of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. According to the standards of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the top 10% in the jci industry is considered top, so it should be reasonable for the second division to be top, but as for the first division, I don't think it's reasonable. Personally, I think this journal is quite fair, at least it gives our small research group a chance to publish, much better than those mpg and jngse that require finding a vice editor to hang a name and finding the editor to say hello.

(1) 讚！ | 吆喝喝

Now NRR has strict requirements for the quality of submissions, and it is expected that the number of submissions will increase dramatically. However, the acceptance rate is likely to be very low.

(1) 讚！ | 在科研的路上狂奔

Many domestic low-quality journals can be promoted to the top tier, why can't well-established foreign journals be promoted to the top tier?

(1) 讚！ | 在科研的路上狂奔

According to the trend of domestic journals being promoted to the top tier, everyone graduating should have three to four top-tier papers in hand, twisted like a doughnut.

(0) 讚！ | 大朗

No wonder the sub-section has been heavily criticized, yet this journal can still be promoted to the top of the first tier, it's hard to understand.

(0) 讚！ | 大朗

Congratulations to NRR for entering the top journal of Chinese Academy of Sciences. The impact factor is expected to exceed 6 this year, and the current prediction by Xuezhice is 5.9.

(1) 讚！ | 在科研的路上狂奔

This is top of the line (*^ω^*)

(4) 讚！ | 吆喝喝

My thesis is in the second round of revisions for minor format changes. The reviewer has recommended acceptance, but the editor has sent it back for format modifications. Will this slow down the progress?

(0) 讚！ | 白娜娜

Revised on January 1st of the 26th year.
Accepted in February of the 26th year.
The submission process took a year and a half, dragging on.

(0) 讚！ | 关关过呀

The first instance has been sent for almost 3 months, why is it so slow? Should we send an email to urge them?

(0) 讚！ | 鹿鹿鹿k

Although, but isn't this just being responsible?

(0) 讚！ | 小能猫

Submitted in March 2025, received comments from reviewers in April, revised and resubmitted in May, one reviewer rejected the submission in June, the editor requested further revisions, revised in July, waited patiently, finally accepted and proofread in November, published in December.

(0) 讚！ | zhuxq

Excuse me, how do I search on this page?

(0) 讚！ | zhangxhxh

Hey bro, where can I check the progress of the review?

(0) 讚！ | warz1andlx

Bro, where did you search for this?

(0) 讚！ | warz1andlx

Trash journals, with extremely irresponsible editors, reject submissions if they can't find reviewers. They only invited six reviewers, so everyone should be cautious and not waste their time.

(0) 讚！ | Accepted ……

After half a year of delay, today the rejection was justified by the lack of reviewers. Upon checking, it was found that only five people were invited. They could have invited more people to avoid wasting time. Strongly advise to stay away!

(0) 讚！ | hhxxv

My application has been under review for 4 months, it's been completely torturous.

(0) 讚！ | 等闲

Are there too few reviewers? I submitted this in early June this year and still haven't received the first review.

(0) 讚！ | kk-k