On August 8th, it was under review, and I received an email showing that one reviewer had agreed to review it. The next day, I saw that one reviewer had already finished reviewing it, and it felt really fast.

(0) 讚！ | 羊想天堂

Indeed, last year I was in the same situation. With the help of AI, the quality of my papers improved several times compared to before. I would rather not have it, as there is no shortage of papers.

(0) 讚！ | Mint_49

Just a note, submitted on July 28th for 26 years, with editor on the 29th, with editor time changed once on the 30th, and there has been no change since then. I have talked to others who submitted this year and last year, and they said this journal has an extremely fast desk rejection speed. Ineligible manuscripts can be rejected within three days. Both of them were rejected at the speed of light within a day and a half after entering with editor.

(0) 讚！ | 羊想天堂

Sent to three reviewers, two reviewers provided minor revisions, and one reviewer clearly did not understand the novelty of the study and gave a useless evaluation. The editor rejected the submission without further consideration. Currently, this journal operates on a policy of immediate rejection if any one reviewer provides a negative evaluation, regardless of the opinions of the other reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | rwth-xj

I submitted the manuscript on the evening of June 9th, and when I woke up on the 10th, it was already "With Editor". However, in the morning of June 11th, it was rejected by the editor. Although it wasn't accepted, the editor was still very quick, haha.

(1) 讚！ | TJUVVV

The contribution level can be viewed in the submission system and can also be viewed when replying to comments, provided that you have not made any changes. I modified the contribution level at that time and can't remember the details of the first submission, but I roughly explained it to the reviewers based on my memory. Specifically: 1. I did not keep good original records, so I can't remember the original contribution level. 2. The table explains the latest contribution level and reasons (provide explanations for important modifications to the contribution level made by the editor based on memory). 3. Scan the signed declaration document and the author's consent.

(0) 讚！ | 十六

Excuse me, has it been resolved?

(0) 讚！ | 放xue别走

Did the submission succeed? Is it because the "Provide additional information" section is not completed, so I can't submit mine either?

(0) 讚！ | 凡投必中

Employed from the 5th to the 25th, with the possibility of rework.

(0) 讚！ | 猪猪

The feeling of writing is just so-so... not very confident.
5.19 submit
5.20 WE

(0) 讚！ | crimp

Everyone, why can't I submit it? Unable to generate PDF.

(0) 讚！ | 汉堡包111

I am also the editor-in-chief, but my lack of originality led to my paper being desk rejected.

(0) 讚！ | cloudy yun

Where can I check the contributions of the author when they first submitted their work? I didn't pay attention when submitting, is it possible to check after submitting?

(0) 讚！ | cloudy yun

What should I do if I don't remember the author contribution when I first submitted the manuscript? Can I still find the author contribution that was written at the time of submission?

(0) 讚！ | cloudy yun

Is the weekend editor of this journal not working? I submitted my article on Friday afternoon and it was still not published by Sunday.

(0) 讚！ | cloudy yun

May I ask which editor it is?

(0) 讚！ | bronny

May I ask how many opinions RRC finally received?

(0) 讚！ | Ji-JJJ

Do we need opinions from three reviewers for this journal? Two reviewers have finished their reviews, but their opinions are conflicting. Will the editor respond?

(0) 讚！ | shuaiqi

The writing is a bit verbose, so I'll add a few more words to share with new contributors:
1. Don't change the order of authors and contributions randomly, which will delay the review process. When replying for the first time, I didn't change the order of authors, just made slight adjustments to the specific contributions, which took a week of back and forth.
2. I haven't seen an official template for writing papers yet. If there is one, you can refer to the information in the submission system and the submission guidelines for the requirements on images and text. The text requirements mainly focus on the cover letter. (I wrote the main body according to the requirements of the submission with my own template)
3. Paper tracking: Follow the official WeChat account of Elsevier Research Publishing Service, enter the manuscript number and corresponding author information to track it; or enter "track your submission" through the link in the email received by the corresponding author.
4. The speed of this journal's editing is quite good, but sometimes reviewers are a bit inconsistent... I wish everyone good luck in getting their submissions accepted.

(1) 讚！ | 十六

2026.01.26 revision submitted (One of the reviewers seemed to have a complete change of heart from their initial positive feedback to a negative evaluation in the second round, lightly criticizing with some data (trying not to be too harsh...), and requesting additional simulations as per their requirements. Reviewer 3 agreed to accept (thank you to this reviewer), a new Reviewer 4 was added, addressing the issues and providing additional data in the response.)

2026.01.31 under review (0, 0, 2)

2026.03.02 accept (2, 2, 3) (Reviewer 4 recommended acceptance, new Reviewer 5 recommended acceptance, sincerely grateful for their recommendations and relevant suggestions, the logical and overall quality has indeed improved. Those days, I was really worried about having to revise again, and even considered switching to another journal.

I suddenly realized that the word "accept" looks really nice, wishing everyone to see the acceptance they desire.)

(0) 讚！ | 十六

Wishing everyone good luck in winning the lottery.

(0) 讚！ | 十六

2025.09.16 submit
2025.09.19 with editor
2025.09.20 under review
2025.10.23 under review(Reviews completed: 1, Review invitations accepted: 2, Review invitations sent: 10)
2025.11.01 under review(2, 4, 11)
2025.11.10 revise(3, 4, 11; finally reviewed by three reviewers, all with positive feedback, with less than twenty total issues identified, but with a higher proportion of repeated issues, as well as a few errors in figure and text numbering, with the rest of the issues addressing experimental additions)
------
2025.12.07 revision submitted
2025.12.12 under review(0, 0, 3)
2025.12.28 under review(2, 2, 4)
2026.01.11 review complete(3, 3, 5)

(0) 讚！ | 十六

The new editor-in-chief Clare of AM may not be friendly towards China, as both of the submissions were directly rejected.

(0) 讚！ | xiaokeyanren

Submitted on January 16, 2026
Reviewed on January 23
Returned on February 27 with comments from five reviewers, requiring major revisions with over 50 suggestions
Journal's plagiarism check rate is below 20%

(0) 讚！ | 猪猪

Congratulations!
Hello! 
Returned for rework on the 31st.

(0) 讚！ | domz1t