May I ask which editor it is?

(0) 讚！ | bronny

May I ask how many opinions RRC finally received?

(0) 讚！ | Ji-JJJ

Do we need opinions from three reviewers for this journal? Two reviewers have finished their reviews, but their opinions are conflicting. Will the editor respond?

(0) 讚！ | shuaiqi

The writing is a bit verbose, so I'll add a few more words to share with new contributors:
1. Don't change the order of authors and contributions randomly, which will delay the review process. When replying for the first time, I didn't change the order of authors, just made slight adjustments to the specific contributions, which took a week of back and forth.
2. I haven't seen an official template for writing papers yet. If there is one, you can refer to the information in the submission system and the submission guidelines for the requirements on images and text. The text requirements mainly focus on the cover letter. (I wrote the main body according to the requirements of the submission with my own template)
3. Paper tracking: Follow the official WeChat account of Elsevier Research Publishing Service, enter the manuscript number and corresponding author information to track it; or enter "track your submission" through the link in the email received by the corresponding author.
4. The speed of this journal's editing is quite good, but sometimes reviewers are a bit inconsistent... I wish everyone good luck in getting their submissions accepted.

(1) 讚！ | 十六

2026.01.26 revision submitted (One of the reviewers seemed to have a complete change of heart from their initial positive feedback to a negative evaluation in the second round, lightly criticizing with some data (trying not to be too harsh...), and requesting additional simulations as per their requirements. Reviewer 3 agreed to accept (thank you to this reviewer), a new Reviewer 4 was added, addressing the issues and providing additional data in the response.)

2026.01.31 under review (0, 0, 2)

2026.03.02 accept (2, 2, 3) (Reviewer 4 recommended acceptance, new Reviewer 5 recommended acceptance, sincerely grateful for their recommendations and relevant suggestions, the logical and overall quality has indeed improved. Those days, I was really worried about having to revise again, and even considered switching to another journal.

I suddenly realized that the word "accept" looks really nice, wishing everyone to see the acceptance they desire.)

(0) 讚！ | 十六

Wishing everyone good luck in winning the lottery.

(0) 讚！ | 十六

2025.09.16 submit
2025.09.19 with editor
2025.09.20 under review
2025.10.23 under review(Reviews completed: 1, Review invitations accepted: 2, Review invitations sent: 10)
2025.11.01 under review(2, 4, 11)
2025.11.10 revise(3, 4, 11; finally reviewed by three reviewers, all with positive feedback, with less than twenty total issues identified, but with a higher proportion of repeated issues, as well as a few errors in figure and text numbering, with the rest of the issues addressing experimental additions)
------
2025.12.07 revision submitted
2025.12.12 under review(0, 0, 3)
2025.12.28 under review(2, 2, 4)
2026.01.11 review complete(3, 3, 5)

(0) 讚！ | 十六

The new editor-in-chief Clare of AM may not be friendly towards China, as both of the submissions were directly rejected.

(0) 讚！ | xiaokeyanren

Submitted on January 16, 2026
Reviewed on January 23
Returned on February 27 with comments from five reviewers, requiring major revisions with over 50 suggestions
Journal's plagiarism check rate is below 20%

(0) 讚！ | 猪猪

Congratulations!
Hello! 
Returned for rework on the 31st.

(0) 讚！ | domz1t

Reviewed within 2 days.

(0) 讚！ | Wzzhxy1

How long does it take for the submission to be reviewed?

(0) 讚！ | zzq123456

The editor is very efficient!
Record the process time:
Submission: 13 Nov 2025
Revision suggestions: 29 Dec 2025 (Revise [not reflecting major or minor revisions], all 3 suggestions are quite positive)
Revision: 15 Jan 2026
Acceptance: 31 Jan 2026
I really like additive manufacturing (although it is not the main focus of my research), and it feels very romantic to publish an article in this journal named "Addictive Manufacturing"! I hope the journal will continue to improve!

(0) 讚！ | Wzzhxy1

What's the status now, brother?

(0) 讚！ | zzq123456

I was rejected very quickly the day after I submitted my application for the first time. This time, after submitting it, the status has been stuck for several days.

(0) 讚！ | E_nBSw

2026.1.4 SJ
2026.1.10 ~ 1.23 WE
Is there any pro in the same situation? It wasn't this slow before.

(0) 讚！ | BINGOSIX

Thank you, brother.

(0) 讚！ | domz1t

It is the author's contribution, and the author's contributions added to your system should be consistent. For example, XXX Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology,...

(0) 讚！ | Wzzhxy1

Does anyone know what should be included in the Author Statement document that needs to be submitted after the rework?

(0) 讚！ | domz1t

Does anyone know what should be included in the Author Statement that needs to be submitted after rework?

(0) 讚！ | domz1t

A paper that I think is good, hoping for good news
Dec 16, 2025 submit
Dec 19, 2025 with editor
Dec 23, 2025 under review 7, 2, 0

(0) 讚！ | HDUer

Submitted to AM today, commemorating and looking forward to good news.

(0) 讚！ | frienda

Just rejected by Carbon after the first review
25.12.17 Submitted to Journal
25.12.18 reject

(0) 讚！ | 小佳佳

Received on 12.12, lasted for two and a half months.

(0) 讚！ | 犇顿

There are a total of four reviewers. If three review comments are received, the manuscript will automatically enter the RRC. The editor will wait for the fourth opinion to come back before immediately providing feedback.

(0) 讚！ | 犇顿