April 1 submit
April 14 with editor
April 15 under review
May 30 revise
June 13 submit
June 27 dip
July 16 Accept
History of the past three and a half months. You can refer to it if needed.

(0) 讚！ | relevance

The reviewers are responding very slowly. It was submitted for review on May 9th, and only one out of the two reviewers has completed the review so far. The editors are also slow to respond, so friends in the predictive field should think carefully.

(0) 讚！ | 科研小光头

7.9 Decision in Process
7.10 Accept
The end, it still feels a bit mysterious, with efficiency fluctuating, taking two months in total. Hopefully, all students can take this into consideration.

(0) 讚！ | XXXX123XXXX

The next step is to go to Decision in Process. It has been stuck for half a month.

(0) 讚！ | relevance

The next step is Decision in Process.

(0) 讚！ | relevance

7.8 Required Reviews Completed. I don't know what will happen next.

(0) 讚！ | XXXX123XXXX

Please translate the following paragraph into English: 3

(0) 讚！ | XXXX123XXXX

All four reviewers of the 6.24 RRC have completed their reviews. As of the evening of 7.7 Beijing time, there have been no updates in the submission system. I hope that the first review will result in a successful revision.

(0) 讚！ | 法拉第的电感圈

I submitted to this journal because it is open source and reviews are supposed to be faster. However, it has been over a month and there are still no reviewers assigned. Please, if there are any kind-hearted reviewers out there, can you help review my submission?

(0) 讚！ | 清醒的我

6.29 First review returned for revisions being processed. With Editor. Hoping for a favorable outcome.

(0) 讚！ | XXXX123XXXX

6.9 revise and submit for external review for one month with 2 reviewers providing 16 revision suggestions. Does anyone know if making serious revisions based on the suggestions will increase the likelihood of acceptance?

(0) 讚！ | XXXX123XXXX

Please translate the following paragraph into English: 2

(0) 讚！ | XXXX123XXXX

Please translate the following passage into English: 1

(0) 讚！ | XXXX123XXXX

I have been on revisions for a month and a half, with 3 reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | relevance

UR has been 70 days, the reviewer sent 27/received 1/accepted 1, feeling that compared with previous journal reviews, the response of the reviewer has slowed down a lot.

(0) 讚！ | 法拉第的电感圈

I am also the only one reviewing. How many have you reviewed? I think the response of the reviewers for this journal is really slow.

(0) 讚！ | 科研小光头

2920了

It is 2920.

(0) 讚！ | relevance

Hi everyone, can you please tell me how to check how many reviewers have been invited? In the submission status of ESWEIL, it only shows that 2+ reviewers have been invited. Also, the only reviewer I accepted the invitation from completed the review in just three days, and the review was finished on May 17th. Does this mean my submission has been rejected directly? How can I check the relevant information?

(0) 讚！ | XXXX123XXXX

Accept review invitation: 5.15
       Send out review invitation*: 2+**

(0) 讚！ | XXXX123XXXX

Today the price has increased to USD 3,040 (excluding taxes).

(0) 讚！ | XXXX123XXXX

Yes, UR has entered external review. The corresponding author will receive an email containing Track and the progress updates are more timely. In addition, by entering the manuscript number on the iThenticate WeChat service account, you can also subscribe to track, but the updates on the service account are slower.

(0) 讚！ | 法拉第的电感圈

5.14 Under Review Is this sent for external review? Can any expert explain it? I suddenly found that the journal has raised its price to USD 3,040 (excluding taxes).

(0) 讚！ | XXXX123XXXX

It's a good thing that the reviewers upstairs agree, at least they are in a better situation than me. Since my article entered UR on 3.30, the editor has been quite responsible, inviting reviewers once every other week (the number of reviewers varies each time). So far, 21 reviewers have been invited, but none are willing to review it. I have looked at the title, abstract, and keywords of my article, and I think there are no major issues, I am still satisfied. I have also done language polishing. I previously sent 6 articles to another journal in the same field, 6 were accepted and 6 were rejected, so I decided to submit to this one for a quicker turnaround. I feel like I may have to resubmit to dip and be re-evaluated by the editorial department.

(0) 讚！ | 法拉第的电感圈

After consulting with customer service, it was submitted for review immediately.

(0) 讚！ | 科研小光头

It has been almost a month since I submitted for review, and only the second reviewer has agreed.

(0) 讚！ | relevance