5.25 DIP, see whether to reject or accept.

(0) 讚！ | jidian123

5.24, accept 3, review 3 complete, Required Reviews Complete.

(0) 讚！ | jidian123

5.22 Review 2, completed 2

(0) 讚！ | jidian123

5.21, still waiting for the second round of review to be completed, it's really slow.

(0) 讚！ | jidian123

Normally, this journal is extremely slow, with the editor taking over two months to respond. I immediately emailed to inquire about the rejection.

(0) 讚！ | 阿良

Hello, may I ask how are you doing now?

(0) 讚！ | qyuygbt

4.20, Under review
5.2, Accept review 2, complete 1

(0) 讚！ | jidian123

Indeed, an open-source time is quite slow.

(0) 讚！ | jidian123

Submitted on 3.23, still with editor. Reminded once after two weeks, no response. If there's no news after one month, I will withdraw the submission.

(0) 讚！ | 想要发paper

Submission was made on 4.1, but now it's already 4.13 and it hasn't been sent for review or rejected yet. At this pace, it feels like the overall time is not going to be fast.

(0) 讚！ | jidian123

Submitted in March 25th year, received first review comments in October, as of April 26th year, no results for the second review yet, and the official website status has been stuck on the day of submitting the revised manuscript. The Elsevier official account shows that all reviewers have completed their reviews in November 25th year, but the official website status is still at "WE". This is the first time I've seen a journal being this slow.

(0) 讚！ | 二十五亿

There are no specific requirements for the template, just submit it directly to his publication.

(0) 讚！ | 呆萌猪111

Has anyone been rejected after submitting a manuscript to the journal? Can it be resubmitted?
The editor provided very general comments, stating only that the quality of the manuscript does not meet the journal's standards. Since it did not undergo external review, there is also uncertainty about how to make revisions.
Also, I would like to ask if it is necessary to use the official template provided by the journal for formatting and uploading?

(0) 讚！ | 安好1201

Three reviewers completed the second review, entered the DIP stage, and then the editor submitted it for review again. Five reviewers completed the review, but it still shows as under review. Five opinions are still not enough, why make it so abstract?

(0) 讚！ | 呆萌猪111

I am also finished reviewing three DIPs, and now I am reviewing URs. I don't know what's going on.

(0) 讚！ | 呆萌猪111

The second review of the RRC took two months, and there has been no progress on the DIP for two weeks, the Portuguese editor said.

(0) 讚！ | Henry@

The editor is this person José António Correia.

(0) 讚！ | 科研菜鸡求带

Don't treat this journal as a normal open-access journal. It's normal for this thing to be slow. Around me, it's common to have seven to nine months and three rounds of review.

(0) 讚！ | 科研菜鸡求带

Which editor are you? Do you have a specific timeline to share? It's been 7 days with my editor and there has been no movement.

(0) 讚！ | 逸仙888

Submitted, make a note.
26.2.5   Submitted to Journal
26.2.7   With Editor

(0) 讚！ | Accepted3025

Eight months, quite slow.

(0) 讚！ | 科研菜鸡求带

What was the final outcome?

(0) 讚！ | 逸仙888

Hey buddy, are you submitting to this publication? I also write about transportation topics.

(0) 讚！ | 逸仙888

Submission on 2nd February 2026. At that time, with the editor, I do not know how fast it will be. I hope it will be faster and smoother!!!

(0) 讚！ | 逸仙888

Is the review process for this journal fast?

(0) 讚！ | JamesBell8