The first submission was reviewed for three months and was rejected in November 25th. The feedback was quite professional, so I made revisions according to the feedback and resubmitted to SETA in January 26th. I thought they wouldn't send it for review, but the editor was quite nice and asked me to provide more details in the cover letter. This time the process was faster, with major revisions completed in two months. I received acceptance just three days after sending back the revised version. The experience was very positive, the editor was diligent and responsible. I wish the journal continued to improve and do better!

(0) 讚！ | 毕业哥哥

26-4-7, accept directly after the second review, good publication.

(0) 讚！ | 聪聪大王

26-1-23 submission
26-3-11 major revision
26-3-28 revised
26-4-7 RRC

(0) 讚！ | 聪聪大王

How is your article going now, boss? My situation is very similar to yours. I submitted my manuscript in August last year, urged twice for review by the end of the year, and still haven't heard anything so far. After submitting it for review, no one replied to my emails. Is it because our research direction is not mainstream?

(0) 讚！ | 洛芷江

I didn't see the formatting requirements and the 5000-word limit this year.

(0) 讚！ | A smile

Is there any formatting requirement for submitting articles to this journal this year?

(0) 讚！ | jun1023

Direction of Power Battery

(0) 讚！ | 铁胆詹姆士

I would like to ask the expert what area of electrical engineering they specialize in.

(0) 讚！ | 凌风者

20260227 UR 12/4/2

(0) 讚！ | ck0119

20260201 UR 12/3/0
20260205 UR 12/4/0
20260207 UR 12/4/1

Translate to English:
20260201 UR 12/3/0
20260205 UR 12/4/0
20260207 UR 12/4/1

(0) 讚！ | ck0119

Submitted on November 16, 2025
Under review on November 30th, 23 review invitations were sent out, two reviewers accepted the invitations, and the review comments were received on December 29th.
With editor again on January 2, 2016
Major revisions were requested, with a total of 16 questions from the two reviewers. The questions were very professional, but the reviewers considered the innovation to be good. The editor requested major revisions and provided 20 days for revisions. Both reviewers approved the revised manuscript on January 31st, and it was accepted for publication.
The journal's review process was very fast, and the editor was very cooperative. Wishing the journal continued success.

(0) 讚！ | 铁胆詹姆士

Record:
20260128 submit
20260130 WE
20260131 UR 12/0/0
20260201 UR 12/3/0

(0) 讚！ | ck0119

Submission on September 26, 2025
UR on October 20
7-2-0
December 5
9-2-0
Reminder on January 7, 2026
12-2-0
Up to now

(0) 讚！ | GAODE

May I ask how it was ultimately resolved?

(0) 讚！ | alpha_cr7

For those who have already submitted their papers, may I ask if you have followed the author checklist, which requires the word count to be less than 5000, total number of figures and tables to be less than 8, and total number of formulas to be less than 5?

(0) 讚！ | alpha_cr7

12.16我们

Please provide more context or complete sentences for better translation.

(0) 讚！ | Susco

Please submit by December 14, 2025.

(0) 讚！ | Susco

More than 4000, almost 5000.

(0) 讚！ | 复兴中华

Oh? How long have you been investing, boss? How low should the plagiarism rate be? I checked and it was 13% before I invested.

(0) 讚！ | 复兴中华

Hello experts, may I ask if this journal has a strict requirement for plagiarism checking? I heard that submissions with high similarity rates are likely to be rejected.

(0) 讚！ | 不能吃辣

Submission on 10.22
Follow-up reminder only after WE
11.23 UR
...The speed is relatively slow, not very suitable for urgent use.

(0) 讚！ | jsdapfkopad

Hello, may I ask what is the number of the application you have submitted?

(0) 讚！ | whwswswws

Submitted to the journal for two days, why?

(0) 讚！ | 铁胆詹姆士

Share the process of submitting to Seta, luckily it went quite smoothly.
8.20 submitted, on the same day we
8.22 the deadline changed
8.25 ur, sent 3 revisions and received 1
8.26, sent 3 revisions and received 2
8.29, sent 3 revisions and received 3, completed 1
8.31 rrc, 2 reviewers have finished reviewing
9.21 first review completed, major revisions, only returned to 2 reviewers, but they gave me 35 comments, with a deadline of 21 days
10.6 returned, we
10.12 ur
10.18 rrc, received feedback on the same day, all reviewers agreed, deputy editor suggested reducing the number of figures and tables to 8, extra ones to be included in supplementary information, minor revisions
10.19 returned, accepted on the same day
10.26 online

(0) 讚！ | 只想发paper

How is the status of your paper now?

(0) 讚！ | Primo