May I ask how did it end in the end?

(0) 讚！ | 东旭

Yeah, it seems like I won't write major or minor, just look at it and change it myself.

(0) 讚！ | piggy17

Could you please clarify if the status changes directly to "revise" after receiving the reviewer's comments, rather than "major" or "minor revise"? Does this also mean that the manuscript needs to be revised according to the reviewer's comments before resubmitting?

(0) 讚！ | Jingnan Guo

The article was submitted to the chief editor, and the efficiency was particularly high. The decision was made very quickly, and the article did not stay in the chief editor's hands for more than a day!
Here is the timeline:
3/22 Submission
3/23 Under review
4/29 Revision comments from four reviewers
5/15 Submission of revised manuscript
5/27 Completion of review by four reviewers
5/28 Acceptance

(0) 讚！ | piggy17

It should be okay, it is said that Elsevier has acquired em. Moreover, on the em system, it also supports quick login using Elsevier account. In this case, it is not surprising to use em for rework. I guess the official website submission method may be a faster or more convenient way for submission.

(0) 讚！ | 田书记

Delivered to Professor Bian, the chief editor is very responsible and has never stayed in his hands for long. Moreover, the two revisions were during the Spring Festival and the May Day holiday.
The difficulty of the journal is quite high, even stricter than similar 1st tier journals. The four reviewers were all junior colleagues, and their opinions were very pertinent. Nearly 20 pages of content were added before and after the revision, and the quality of the article has improved significantly compared to when it was submitted.

(0) 讚！ | Nisha

Only able to submit to the Elsevier system, but subsequent manuscript processing and revisions are still done on EM, quite strange for this journal.

(0) 讚！ | Nisha

Is it the correct procedure to submit a paper to this journal by clicking on the new submission button, which then redirects to the Elsevier submission page instead of the EM system? Also, the corresponding author has not received a confirmation email, so it's a bit confusing as to what is happening.

(0) 讚！ | 张学生学生

One major revision and one minor revision, Antonio chose to do the major revision and mentioned that there is only one opportunity for modifications. Have you ever encountered this situation?

(0) 讚！ | CaiW_UoN

3.12 WE
3.20 UR
4.6 RRC
4.20 ACCEPT

(0) 讚！ | hehezhaohehe

20260422 First Instance Rejection

(0) 讚！ | huang159

20260422 First-instance rejection

(0) 讚！ | huang159

2026.04.19 The third reviewer of RRC has finished reviewing.

(0) 讚！ | huang159

2026.04.12 rrc 2 reviewers completed the review.

(0) 讚！ | huang159

2026.03.12 Two reviewers from RRC have completed the review.

(0) 讚！ | huang159

You can find that the track link was sent to the corresponding author's email.

(0) 讚！ | huang159

Can we check the progress of the review by Elsevier one day after it is submitted for external review?

(0) 讚！ | CaiW_UoN

One day after submission, UR, but the progress of the review by Elsevier has not been displayed. Has it been sent for external review?

(0) 讚！ | CaiW_UoN

UR me within 7 days. I was.

(0) 讚！ | Shi Jiahong

2026.03.26 Submission
2026.03.27 External review
2026.04.08 4 reviewers accepted the review, 1 completed the review.

(0) 讚！ | huang159

How is the progress on the editing by Antonio Gomes Correia?

(0) 讚！ | chao

Submitted on 1.23, rejected on 3.17. Two reviewers suggested minor revisions, but the editor decided to reject it.

(0) 讚！ | 安之若命

11.20 submission
12.26 minor revision given over forty days
2.6 revised
accept two weeks later

(0) 讚！ | zjhzjhzjh111

The review process was very fast, submitted on 11.20 and accepted on 2.23.

(0) 讚！ | ranran666

Currently it is 7-4-3, why isn't RRC displayed yet? Isn't it normal to have RRC after receiving responses from two experts?

(0) 讚！ | zxy