I am in this situation now, is this situation hopeless?

(0) 讚！ | llllxj

I sent it, but I haven't received it yet.

(0) 讚！ | GYYFJP

Submission on 26-8-3
WE on 26-8-4

(0) 讚！ | 小F师兄

Has it been submitted for review now? This journal is so slow.

(0) 讚！ | gb50010

Is it under review now? How long does it usually take?

(0) 讚！ | gb50010

Have you submitted it for review yet? Is it still "With editor" from the submission on 6.29?

(0) 讚！ | Lucky yy

Have you submitted your article for review? I submitted mine on June 29th, and it is still "With editor."

(0) 讚！ | Lucky yy

Which editor are you working with? Has it been sent for review? I submitted on 6.29, is it still with the editor?

(0) 讚！ | Lucky yy

The first time submitting to JBE, the process was very fast. The reviewers were very efficient, and the editors were also quite prompt.

6.1 Submitted to the journal
6.2 Under review (5 reviewers)
6.7 Required Reviews Completed 
6.14 Major revision
7.4 Resubmitted to the journal
7.12 Under review (5 reviewers)
7.18 RRC
7.20 Accepted

(0) 讚！ | 香菜味福佳白

Please also ask how long WE will take.

(0) 讚！ | 喜羊羊也爱猫

How long does it take for this journal with editor?

(0) 讚！ | nijajja

真**慢E translates to "So slow."

(1) 讚！ | solidwork

This journal will not accept submissions on topics such as road subgrades and pile foundations for those without a background in architecture.

(0) 讚！ | wyrmTu

Please translate the following passage into English: 2026.07.07 Accept

(0) 讚！ | leey

The editor-in-chief has invited 8 more people again, it's been a week and so far everyone has accepted, feeling overwhelmed. How long does this invitation expire if it's not accepted? Does anyone know if it's 21 days, 14 days or 28 days? I have one person who disappeared during the second review, invited by the editor-in-chief.

(0) 讚！ | 恒

Your AI reviewer is still okay, giving you a reply. My AI reviewer, after accepting the invitation, just ran away. It has been a month and still no feedback. These people are ruining the rules. What should we do?

(0) 讚！ | 恒

I have encountered similar situations before when submitting to TAFM. The first review asked you to change A, and the second review asked you to change A to B. Sometimes, the same thing is requested to be revised multiple times, and there are also some papers where the content is clearly written but additional information is requested just to demonstrate the authority of the reviewers. During the second review, I directly sent an explanation to the editor Luca, who efficiently completed the letter and immediately recorded it without delay.

(0) 讚！ | 哭泣小萝卜888

Is this guy not afraid of being criticized? Let's point out his flaws now, and in the future, let's all review this guy's articles together.

(0) 讚！ | 哭泣小萝卜888

My second AI, the second review has been more than 21 days and still has not been returned. I am trembling with fear.

(0) 讚！ | 恒

2026.05.12 Second Major Revision (Two reviewers in total, Reviewer 1 accepted, Reviewer 2 provided 5 more comments)
2026.06.03 Third Major Revision (Reviewer 2 suggested rejection, provided 5 more comments)

(0) 讚！ | leey

It's a bit scary, I have also been stuck by the second reviewer.

(0) 讚！ | leey

4.03 submission,
4.06 we,
4.09 we,
4.18 ur0-1-5
4.21 ur1-2-5
5.4 rrc 2-2-5
5.9 dip
5.10 Major one major revision, one minor revision
5.22 submitted R1
5.27 accepted

(0) 讚！ | fan0111

How long does it take for DIP to give opinions?

(0) 讚！ | 中啦

Hello, may I ask what is the current status of your article? Has it been revised?

(0) 讚！ | Chiml

The rate of reviewers running away from this journal is extremely high. The editors are stubborn and narrow-minded. Various unreasonable phenomena will occur. Compared to other journals, this journal relies too much on luck.

(0) 讚！ | solidwork