4.10 With Editor
.......
4.16 With Editor Why is it taking so long to be With Editor? How long will it take to be reviewed? It feels too slow. After being rejected by AM, I chose a journal. How is the speed of this journal?

(0) 讚！ | Kistagoogle

Does the OP have anything to say? I also dipped, and now I'm panicking.

(1) 讚！ | 衣服菌

How about it, OP? Were you rejected after the RRC?

(0) 讚！ | 顶刊收割机

On the academic path, what is most difficult is not adding icing on the cake, but providing justice like sending charcoal in the snow. Reading about a peer's experience with submitting to ESM, I resonate deeply. Our work on sulfide solid-state lithium battery anodes has also been quietly polished for 2 years, and was submitted to ESM for review on February 11, 2026. 

In this fast-paced publishing era, I am grateful that "Energy Storage Materials" still adheres to the original intention of 'double-blind peer review'. For ordinary researchers like us without the halo of a large team, this system allows manuscripts to no longer be dependent on the authors' titles, but to return to the value of the work itself. I look forward to ESM’s efficiency and professionalism bringing a fair judgment to our work, and I hope to, like that peer, receive the best news in this rigorous and warm environment. Regardless of the outcome, this 'only talent is raised' academic environment deserves the praise of every serious research scientist.

(3) 讚！ | sfu

Has it been fixed after the dip?

(0) 讚！ | Shanshan Feng

How are you now, have you accepted it?

(0) 讚！ | 顶刊收割机

Excuse me, does the RRC have a dip? Is it a good thing that the first-instance RRC is too fast?

(0) 讚！ | Shanshan Feng

The work on the lithium-ion battery cathode based on poor cobalt and manganese has been done for 3 years. It was first submitted to AM, rejected after 15 days, and the editor suggested submitting to a small journal. It was then submitted to AEM, rejected after 3 days, submitted to Angew. Chem. Int. Ed, rejected within 2 days, tried nano energy, rejected after 2 days for lack of innovation. Finally, it was submitted to ESM, sent for review after 3 days, returned with feedback in about 15 days from two reviewers, both providing positive feedback suggesting minor revisions. The revised manuscript was returned half a month later, accepted after 5 days, immediately went online, and proofs were corrected within 3 days. Sincere thanks to Academician Cheng Huiming and Editor Wu Zhongshuai for their support. Also, special thanks to the double-blind review system adopted by "Energy Storage Materials" - it is this fair mechanism that enables ordinary researchers without prestigious titles to still have their work valued. Thanks to the efficient and professional reviewers at ESM, who brought warmth in the form of the first feedback in the new year when the student felt almost desperate. If you are also experiencing difficulties in submitting manuscripts and facing setbacks in research, I hope my sharing can bring you some comfort. I have also stumbled along the way, and when you start to doubt yourself, may this experience bring you a glimmer of hope. The road of scientific research is long and challenging, but worth persevering, and you are not alone.

(1) 讚！ | 不二周助大哥

How is it going? Is the review process fast?

(0) 讚！ | Shanshan Feng

What's the situation in the end?

(0) 讚！ | IBM007

10.27 submitted
10.28 with editor
11.5 under review
11.6 under review
11.10 under review

(0) 讚！ | qiuqian0304

Please translate the following passage into English: 在投

(0) 讚！ | qiuqian0304

11.11 Review Complete

(0) 讚！ | Tse-Yen Chou

10.21 submitted
10.22 with editor
10.23 under review
11.01 Required Reviews Complete
11.03 Required Reviews Complete
11.04 Required Reviews Complete
11.05 Required Reviews Complete
11.07 Required Reviews Complete
11.08 Required Reviews Complete
11.10 Required Reviews Complete

(0) 讚！ | Tse-Yen Chou

99 is rejected.

(0) 讚！ | Tse-Yen Chou

May I ask, what is the current status now?

(0) 讚！ | hao

DIP is almost equal to rejection.

(0) 讚！ | dawang

Submitted on August 29th, directly with editor.

(0) 讚！ | 往上走

8.4 We
8.8 UR
8.24 RRC
8.25 DIP
Does anyone know if this DIP represents a rejection?

(0) 讚！ | sadhuias

Boss, may I ask if you fixed it after RRC and DIP?

(0) 讚！ | 薛海涛

2025.07.04 Submitted
2025.07.06 With editor
2025.07.07 With editor
2025.07.09 Under Review
2025.07.22 RRC (Reviewer's Comments)
2025.07.27 With editor - 2 recommendations for major revisions
2025.08.08 Under Review
2025.08.20 Accepted

(1) 讚！ | dawang

How are you doing now?

(0) 讚！ | 会更客观

2025.03.10 Submission
2025.04.08 Overhaul
2025.04.30 Acceptance

(1) 讚！ | 李三李晓锋

2025.05.22 revision submitted.

(0) 讚！ | upc-petroluem

2025.05.27接受

(0) 讚！ | upc-petroluem