| 期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱 | IEEE-CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica LetPub Score 7.9
52 ratings
Rate
Reputation 8.5 Influence 7.4 Speed 7.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 期刊簡稱 | IEEE-CAA J AUTOMATIC | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ISSN | 2329-9266 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| E-ISSN | 2329-9274 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| h-index | 51 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 自引率 (2023-2024) | 9.80%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 官方網站 | https://www.ieee-jas.net/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 在線稿件提交 | https://mc03.manuscriptcentral.com/ieee-jas | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 開放訪問 | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 出版商 | IEEE | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 主題領域 | Engineering | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 出版國/地區 | PEOPLES R CHINA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 發行頻率 | 月刊 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 創刊年 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 每年文章數 | 205每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 黃金OA百分比 | 0.41% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q1
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=2329-9266%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| *所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
| 首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
| [IEEE-CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
| 作者: 2655hrews 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 4.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2026-04-17 16:29:57 評論於 Hello, yes. But I'm not sure if it's new or the original. I resubmitted with two additional reviewers. |
| 作者: keyanzhazha 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-04-14 18:47:31 評論於 With your kind words, the fifth round of review has been completed. Hopefully, good luck will be on our side. |
| 作者: TXQF 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-04-14 18:34:01 評論於 The first take I mentioned, you should be able to record it, right? |
| 作者: keyanzhazha 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-04-14 18:22:11 評論於 Bro, don't scare me. I have gone from "awaiting AE recommendation" to only "awaiting DEIC recommendation" now. They won't reject it, right? |
| 作者: TXQF 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-04-14 16:26:56 評論於 It seems that after the first round of Awaiting AE Recommendation, only papers with at least an RR rating will receive comments, otherwise they will be rejected directly. I wonder if that is the case. |
| 作者: Greedy 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-04-08 20:53:22 評論於 Has your current situation changed? |
| 作者: 靓仔1997 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-04-07 16:33:41 評論於 Hello, may I ask if there is a process for selecting reviewers after your manuscript has been revised? |
| 作者: 靓仔1997 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-04-07 14:43:10 評論於 Please translate the following paragraph into English: 你 |
| 作者: 2655hrews 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 4.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2026-04-07 14:31:00 評論於 Here is the translation: Share the submission process, and also thank the friends who shared their experiences before. Overall, it took about twelve months, the reviewer stage was very quick, with most of the time spent in the editorial office. 2025.04 First submission 2025.08 Reject with permission to resubmit 2025.09 Resubmission 2026.01 Awaiting peer review 2026.02 Accept with minor revision 2026.02 With editor 2026.04 Accept |
| 作者: xiaoppp 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-27 08:57:07 評論於 Submission on July 20, 2025 Approximately 4 months for review A round of rejection and resubmission, which is essentially a major revision, following the journal's requirements, only one opportunity for revisions is given, rejection and resubmission may be to meet this requirement Second round of submission in mid-January Almost two months for review Accepted in late March Total duration of 8 and a half months Thanks to JAS This journal has a fast external review process once the submission is made. |
| 作者: 靓仔1997 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-26 15:39:57 評論於 Who will be the next editor-in-chief? Hurry up and replace Mr. Han, he is always attending meetings everywhere and never goes online. |
| 作者: 广工榨菜 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-26 09:24:21 評論於 Recently changing editors, the processing time for AE is very long, so those who are eager to graduate should be cautious when submitting. |
| 作者: geminipp 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-24 17:15:56 評論於 As mentioned above, it has been two months since submission and it is still awaiting editor processing. Is the editorial process for this journal usually this slow? |
| 作者: lllllllllj 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-23 22:39:03 評論於 Have you guys ever tried calling the editorial department to urge progress? |
| 作者: sci五区选手 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-21 12:31:29 評論於 I have been in the editor process for two months after submitting. |
| 作者: sci五区选手 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-21 12:30:56 評論於 I submitted it on January 27th and I am still waiting for editor processing. What does this mean? |
| 作者: Ninetynine 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-17 15:19:53 評論於 If the process doesn't move forward in the next half month, I will leave. It has been eight months and the paper hasn't reached the reviewer yet. I feel like the ideas in the paper are no longer as novel. |
| 作者: wjshi 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-16 15:24:33 評論於 The second review has been stuck on "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" for several months. Has a new reviewer been added? Why has it been stuck for so long? |
| 作者: lvjj 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-13 16:11:25 評論於 I have been in this status for three months, but the status has changed from "Awaiting Deputy EIC Recommendation & Awaiting Reviewer selection" directly to "Awaiting Deputy EIC Recommendation." Does this mean I will be rejected? |
| 作者: lvjj 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-13 11:02:11 評論於 Does going from "Awaiting Deputy EIC Recommendation & Awaiting Reviewer selection" directly to "Awaiting Deputy EIC Recommendation" mean it's going to be rejected? |
| 作者: 靓仔1997 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-09 10:40:26 評論於 It is not recommended for anyone outside the circle to submit to this journal. The journal circle is much smaller than that of Trans of the same level, all automated society people are playing, similar to the circle of Chinese scientific information science. |
| 作者: 靓仔1997 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-09 10:37:52 評論於 Submitted in December 2024, rejected twice and resubmitted (with two additional reviewers in the second round) in January 2026 for minor revisions. It is still stuck at the first step. The innovation in this paper has long become outdated given the processing speed. |
| 作者: Greedy 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-04 17:27:24 評論於 Brother, we are in the same boat. I have been in the same condition as you for three months. |
| 作者: Ninetynine 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-04 11:35:05 評論於 Hi guys, Awaiting Deputy EIC Recommendation Awaiting Reviewer Selection has been in this status for three and a half months, is this normal? |
| 作者: epsilon.phi1 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 直接被接受 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-01 11:53:46 評論於 Submitted (Letter, max 3 pages) - 15-Nov-2025 Reject with permission to resubmit (26-Dec-2025) Submitted 28-Dec-2025 (the same reviewers) Awaiting Deputy EIC Recommendation: between 2-6-Feb-2026 Awaiting EIC Decision 28-Feb-2026 Accept (01-Mar-2026) The paper was reviewed by four reviewers. The comments were quite demanding, but fair and technically solid. Overall, I had a very good impression of the review process. |
| 首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
Contact us