I submitted it on January 29th, and it changed from under review to under consideration half a month ago.

(0) 讚！ | Withey

Hello author, when submitting a manuscript, the system displays the corresponding author as the first author and cannot be changed. The system directly shows the corresponding author as the first author, while in the text the corresponding author is listed as the second author. How should this situation be handled?

(0) 讚！ | zhouyuyu

Hello author, when submitting the manuscript, the system shows the corresponding author as the first author, and the system cannot be changed. What should I do in this situation? The corresponding author is listed second in the paper.

(0) 讚！ | zhouyuyu

I have only published one paper in the relevant field in NJP, and have been invited to review it. After reading the opinions of the other two reviewers, I feel they are quite vague. This journal is just average, not as good as PRA or B.

(0) 讚！ | lanktbxl

Will it be rejected after review becomes consideration?

(0) 讚！ | 大黄蜂123

Leaving aside other things, the review process is really fast.

(0) 讚！ | adadadad

The reviewer is very professional, most likely invited from the field related to NC or NP. The feedback provided is very professional and constructive.

(0) 讚！ | 海边拾贝

There are not many journals in the field of physics with an impact factor around 6, and the average level of articles should be close to the "Physical Review" series of letters.

(0) 讚！ | 海边拾贝

Cannot reach the PRX level. Personally, I feel it is similar to the letter in PRB. Besides, the impact factor is also average. If the impact factor exceeds 7, then CP will be more competitive.

(0) 讚！ | 平步青云

What level is this journal considered? PRX?

(0) 讚！ | Innk

Let's stop bragging. I submitted an article and received feedback after two months. One reviewer recommended publication, stating that the article was "written clearly, and the authors employed several advanced computational methods to make their prediction reliable." The other reviewer rejected the article, stating that "the current manuscript lacks evidence that supports the arguments." The editor ultimately rejected the article.

I don't understand why the second reviewer had a negative impact. I submitted the article in May without citing two articles published in June. They claimed those articles were important, but I couldn't have known about them as I am not a time traveler. My article on arXiv cited all relevant articles. 

Of course, the feedback from the first reviewer was also nitpicking. I clearly stated in the methods section that I used a pseudopotential, but they wanted me to specify which pseudopotential I used in more detail. Ha ha...

(0) 讚！ | SSSSS12

The "Sun Journal" under Nature's umbrella, however, has very good article quality in the ultra-fast direction. This journal seems to have a special preference for TS-DFT, with a lot of important work on nonlinear dynamics published in it. Two reviewers asked very professional and insightful questions, and after a thorough review of three rounds, the manuscript was submitted four times back and forth with proofs (Nature series journals have extremely high formatting requirements, with over 100 items on the checklist, but modifications are only allowed after acceptance in principle).

(0) 讚！ | 孟德尔的小豆芽

- Waiting for Revision
April 21, 23
- Decision Made
April 25, 23
- Under Consideration
March 22, 23
- Under Review
March 22, 23
- Submission
March 9, 23

(0) 讚！ | 海边拾贝

Overall, it is still good. The reviewers under Nature are very professional, having at least published in the journal before. The feedback they provide is also professional and constructive, as evident from the peer review process.

(0) 讚！ | 海边拾贝

The reviewers are very professional, having at least published in NC journals. Their feedback is also professional and objective, just like NC. You can tell just by looking at the peer review.

(0) 讚！ | 海边拾贝

It's quite normal, everything is normal for two to three weeks.

(0) 讚！ | 海边拾贝

No, it's more than 20,000 RMB. Cheaper than Nature Communication.

(0) 讚！ | 海边拾贝

Alright, alright, stop boasting.

(0) 讚！ | 漫天星辰花

A classmate submitted an article, which was later accepted for publication, and it turned out that the layout fee is 38,000 RMB!!!!!!

(0) 讚！ | 漫天星辰花

The difficulty level is similar to Nature Communications, but the subcategory is physics. If you check the reviewers in ORCID, you will know that the reviewers have at least published in Nature Physics, Nature Communications, and PRL.

(0) 讚！ | fdasfasdf

It has been a week since the editor was assigned, is this normal? Can any brother or sister provide some guidance?

(0) 讚！ | 猪猪大熊猫

In the PR series, it definitely can't compare to PRL and PRX, but it is slightly better than the other PR publications.

(0) 讚！ | HEDP

Will there be any changes in status details after "under review", or will it go directly to the editor's decision?

(0) 讚！ | Tsing1234

submission -> under review

(0) 讚！ | fdasfasdf

Brothers, have any of you submitted before? Can you share the process of submission status changes? I have been in the Submission status for my submission. What will happen next if it goes for review?

(0) 讚！ | Tsing1234