| 期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱 | Communications Biology LetPub Score 7.4
52 ratings
Rate
Reputation 8.0 Influence 6.6 Speed 8.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 期刊簡稱 | COMMUN BIOL | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ISSN | 2399-3642 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| h-index | N.A. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 自引率 (2023-2024) | 1.90%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 官方網站 | http://www.nature.com/commsbio/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 在線稿件提交 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 開放訪問 | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 出版商 | Springer Nature | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 主題領域 | Medicine | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 出版國/地區 | ENGLAND | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 發行頻率 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 創刊年 | 2018 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 每年文章數 | 1663每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 黃金OA百分比 | 99.93% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
OA Related Info![]() | APC: Yes( GBP2890; USD3890; EUR3290; ) APC waiver:Check Notes Other charges: No Keywords: biology、biological sciences、life sciences Useful LinksAims & ScopeAuthor InstructionsEditorial BoardAnonymous peer review | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q1
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=2399-3642%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: 13 Weeks | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| *所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |
| 首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
| [Communications Biology] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
| 作者: YN-1 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 7.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2026-04-18 21:13:19 評論於 Both the editors and the reviewers are very responsible. In particular, I encountered a reviewer who paid attention to every punctuation mark. After multiple rounds of revisions, the quality of the manuscript has indeed greatly improved. |
| 作者: 重庆一区扛把子 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 5.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-31 21:07:18 評論於 The work of the master's degree, focused on stem cells, took a total of 5 months to complete, and was accepted after a major revision. The supplementary experiments took 2 months, but did not delay the editing process. The reviewers were also very professional, with one requesting that WB submissions include full membrane markers, which was considered very strict. However, the impact factor now seems to be falling behind even smaller journals like CDD, struggling to maintain a score of 5. |
| 作者: 陶桃再世 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-25 23:10:09 評論於 26.2.21 NC rejected, transferred to CB 26.3.3 Editor assigned 26.3.5 Initial manuscript review started 26.3.14 Under review The speed of the editorial office can only be described as average. After being rejected by NC, they sent an email saying they transferred it to CB to ensure external review, but it still took over twenty days before being sent for review. You can check the review status on Research Square, from inviting 13 reviewers to 20, 29, 35... It has been a week since it was sent for review, but they still haven't found any reviewers. This journal is supposed to have a good reputation, yet they can't even find reviewers... It seems like nobody wants to work for free nowadays. |
| 作者: yijinsha 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-01 10:05:11 評論於 Editor Assigned 17th Feb 26 Submission 7th Feb 26 The editor's processing speed is too slow, please reject with some efficiency! |
| 作者: 科研小秋 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2026-02-28 10:14:46 評論於 The manuscript was under review for 3 months with 2 reviewers, one major revision and one minor revision, but ultimately rejected by the editor. |
| 作者: yijinsha 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-02-27 10:33:26 評論於 How long did you stay at the editor assigned? |
| 作者: 胖崽 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2026-02-27 09:33:22 評論於 I submitted to NC and then transferred to CB. It took 7 months from submission to acceptance. If you are in a hurry to graduate, be cautious in submitting because the review process is very strict. There were three rounds of revisions before finally being accepted, and it took over a month to make format changes after the acceptance. It was the longest process among the journals I submitted to, but in the end, it was still accepted and turned out well. |
| 作者: yijinsha 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-02-07 19:57:29 評論於 NC recommends transferring, first time submitting to Communications Biology, hoping for smooth sailing! |
| 作者: 甜蜜啥都 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-01-31 20:34:27 評論於 This magazine is particularly trashy, with no academic editor assigned to submissions for 40 days after submission, and reminders receive only template responses. |
| 作者: jiangjiangcai 領域: 地球科学 審稿時間: 4.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2026-01-24 10:51:38 評論於 The submission was sent for review 10 days after submission, but it took a month to find a reviewer. The review process lasted for 3 months before ultimately being rejected. |
| 作者: 无边66 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-01-21 17:00:42 評論於 What is their attitude towards the computer paper? Will they ask you to do biological validation or something like that? |
| 作者: 无边66 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-01-21 16:59:54 評論於 May I ask what their attitude is towards computer papers? Will they ask you to do biological validation or something like that? |
| 作者: 无边66 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-01-21 16:57:34 評論於 Can I ask if it was NC who asked you to switch to CB, or did you do it on your own? How do they feel about computer papers? Will they ask you to do biological verification or something like that? |
| 作者: luoyongjian 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 7.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-12-20 16:58:32 評論於 I submitted my paper on April 20th and received feedback from reviewers two months later. After making revisions, two out of three reviewers agreed one month later. The paper was conditionally accepted on September 16th. Since it was my first submission to a journal under Nature, the data openness and replicability requirements were quite complex and caused some trouble, but the paper was finally accepted in December. Overall, the reviewers and editors were very responsible and provided constructive feedback. I made modifications based on their suggestions, resulting in improved figures and resolution of many issues that existed before submission. I am quite careless, but the editors were patient and gave me multiple chances. Thank you! |
| 作者: biomichael 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 6.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-11-10 22:49:41 評論於 How long after receiving provisional acceptance will the formal acceptance be granted? |
| 作者: biomichael 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 6.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-11-10 22:47:09 評論於 May I ask how long it took to receive approval after submitting the modified document based on the 20-page document? |
| 作者: 樊泽秋 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-11-02 10:30:44 評論於 Oh, the rework was rejected? Why? |
| 作者: Bobummy的白月光 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-10-03 14:26:44 評論於 I am also having trouble uploading the rework, I have contacted technical support but have not received a response yet. |
| 作者: luxian 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2025-10-01 16:28:09 評論於 In February, we submitted the project, and in March we were required to make major repairs. In July, after returning for repairs, the request was rejected after two months of review. It's frustrating how slow the repair process is. |
| 作者: 赵渊祥 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-29 10:26:33 評論於 Could you please tell me how things are going with the manuscript that changed from "editor review start" to "under review" and then back to "editor review start" again? Has there been any follow-up? My manuscript was under review for two months before changing back to "editor review start". I'm not sure what's going on. |
| 作者: Luyang 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-25 09:23:00 評論於 Could you please clarify if the author sent an email through the submission system or directly to their editorial department? I have sent an email but have not received a response. |
| 作者: 终结者 囧 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 4.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-04 12:49:23 評論於 Mainly because there are a lot of submissions, mine has been accepted in principle. After making the necessary modifications according to the formatting requirements and submitting it, it is currently in the "Editor Assigned" stage. |
| 作者: SchordK 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-02 09:37:50 評論於 This journal is really slow, Editor Assigned has been almost 20 days already............ |
| 作者: mollymmm 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-01 12:32:37 評論於 Hello, I would like to ask if you submitted the checklist and summary after revising the manuscript, or if you were requested to submit them via email when you first submitted the manuscript for review? |
| 作者: mollymmm 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-01 11:54:57 評論於 Can I ask if your submission status has changed from "editor review start" to "under review" and then back to "editor review start" the next day? Also, has the External Editor changed from "Assigned" to "Not Assigned"? I'm not sure what this situation means and I haven't received any emails asking me to fill out forms (I'm not sure if I didn't receive them because I selected "NO" for Preprint Deposition). It's been several days now and I'm not sure if the submission has actually been sent for review. |
| 首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
Contact us