记录下时间，并提问。我返修后2个月没消息了。
3月5日提交初稿
3月5日送审
5月6日修改并重新提交，4个审稿人27条意见
6月3日修改完成并提交
现在8月6日还没结果

(0) 讚！ | 2207201665@qq.com

Received on April 26, 2025,
Revised and resubmitted on June 28, 2025 following 15 minor comments from two reviewers, requiring substantial revisions.
Resubmitted on July 28, 2025.

Share and gather some good karma.

(0) 讚！ | 毕业努力中

2025.06.07 submitted
2025.06.09 under review - until now
Slower than expected.

(0) 讚！ | kkkkkkkris

Brother, how's it going with your situation? I also haven't had any results for three months.

(0) 讚！ | bigbrz

Two reviewers, one well-organized, found the experimental results convincing and gave minor revisions suggesting to enlarge the figures. The other reviewer found the manuscript well-structured but provided 6 minor revisions, mainly requesting additional details on the model. The editor rejected the submission, citing that the focus was primarily on automation and not closely related to robotics, with no option for resubmission. Despite staying up late to address all comments and appealing, the submission was still rejected. Additionally, the postdoc and senior brother are not from the IEEE field.

(0) 讚！ | ravena

What does the abbreviation "AE" stand for? Let me check if it's mine.

(0) 讚！ | hash_lee

May I ask how this was handled afterwards? Were there any new reviewers involved in the revisions?

(0) 讚！ | MoonSheep

Here is a suggestion for update: When responding to the review comments, I used GPT for language polishing in some places, which was pointed out by one of the reviewers. They felt disrespected, so it's better to be cautious in using it in the future. Fortunately, the feedback from the three reviewers on the technical content part was very positive.

(0) 讚！ | zouqingxiao

Received on July 18, 2025.

(0) 讚！ | cylucn

2025.07.22: Accept
Received the job offer early in the morning, finally accepted it, very quickly.

(1) 讚！ | zouqingxiao

Can you tell me if publishing in open source also counts as a publication in the Chinese Academy of Sciences' second-tier journals? And how long does it usually take to be accepted for publication?

(0) 讚！ | hm_virtual

How long does it take to retrieve the pre-print after being hired?

(0) 讚！ | F3NG1997

Conditional acceptance basically means acceptance, and then responding to some minor comments from the reviewer. If the suggestion is to resubmit, it means that after making revisions based on the reviewer's comments, there is a chance that the journal will accept the revised submission and assign a new submission number. Based on our previous experience, the reviewers who did not agree to accept the last time will review it again, and may also invite new reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | 搬砖香菜

Which AE is it? Can you provide an abbreviation?

(0) 讚！ | hash_lee

The order placed on July 8th is still marked as received. I don't know what's going on, are they on vacation?

(0) 讚！ | kml1

I have also been Received for several days.

(0) 讚！ | tanci&xuxu

Brother, do you have any updates? I submitted my application at the end of March. It is still under review and when I click on the application number to view "Reviews and publication decisions," there is nothing there.

(0) 讚！ | 牛马64号

Received, it seems like it took less than four months from submission to acceptance.

(0) 讚！ | Tenny

Can you try TIE?

(0) 讚！ | zouqingxiao

I have been lurking for a long time, but today I can't help but speak out. It's really frustrating to encounter an irresponsible AE.
First submission
2024.08.20 submit
2024.11.28 revise and resubmit
2025.02.10 reject and encourage to resubmit
Stay up all night to revise the second submission
2025.02.12 submit
2025.05.12 revise and resubmit
2025.07.09 reject and encourage to resubmit
When I received the RR for the second submission, one of the reviewers' comments was completely irrelevant to my article. I even asked the AE, but he stubbornly refused to acknowledge it.
Now I'm frustrated, being tossed around like a ball for a year. How can I avoid this AE next time, or should I submit to a different journal?

(0) 讚！ | tiantian12139

Hello, do I need to send a separate email for resubmission after rejection, or can I mention it in the cover letter?

(0) 讚！ | MoonSheep

Hello, may I ask what does this acceptance condition mean? Why have three new reviewers been invited? I feel like you, stuck in the revise and reject cycle. The editor even said they hope for significant improvements for a resubmission...

(0) 讚！ | MoonSheep

Do you still need to resubmit this? I was also rejected after revising, there are not many remaining issues, but additional experiments are needed. The editor also mentioned that there is a good chance for me to resubmit.

(0) 讚！ | MoonSheep

Tragedy after revising and resubmitting, subsequently switched to another conference. The reason is that one reviewer felt it had a limited technical contribution, the method was straightforward, and kept emphasizing another xxx method. Despite the fact that the additional experiments outperformed the xxx method and explained the differences, especially since we did not need a dataset and instead directly utilized pre-trained model information, while the method he mentioned required a dataset. However, the reviewer replied, "there are already many publicly available datasets that xxx methods utilize with minimal cost. Choosing not to use them results in a method that feels underpowered and suboptimal." I believe he is not the author of the xxx method, as I have cited and praised it, but he is definitely a faithful follower of xxx. In the future, let's just stick to working on neural network modules, even circuit diagrams. It seems that simple and easy-to-use methods are hard to come by for large groups. Limited technical contribution, lack of novelty is truly my research nightmare.

(0) 讚！ | vash1970

Sure, please refer to the submission guidelines on the official website.

(0) 讚！ | zhangj@qq