The entire submission process went smoothly, inviting 8 reviewers, with 1 rejection and 1 withdrawal from review. 6 reviewers provided more or less suggestions for revisions. I am flattered to have attracted so many peers...

(0) 讚！ | 挥手对我说一声四季不变

Received date: 21 Dec 2025
Editorial assignment start date: 22 Dec 2025
Independent review start date: 08 Jan 2026
Interactive review activated date: 11 Feb 2026
Review finalized date: 23 Feb 2026
Final validation date: 24 Feb 2026

(0) 讚！ | emo

Record the entire process from submission to acceptance. Overall, the process was quite fast, mainly delayed a bit due to the Christmas holiday, and the feedback came back a little late. As soon as work resumed after the holiday, the manuscript was promptly processed. The reviewers were quite professional and provided some very good suggestions, which significantly improved the quality of our manuscript.

November 11, 2025: Submitted
November 12, 2025: Editorial assignment
December 1, 2025: Independent review
January 5, 2026: Interactive review activated (Reviewer 1 suggested acceptance, while Reviewer 2 suggested major revisions)
January 18, 2026: Review finalized (Revised on the same day, Reviewer 2 accepted the current version of the manuscript)
January 19, 2026: Passed to the editor for submission of a revised version without tracked changes, fixing minor issues
January 20, 2026: Uploaded the requested latest version. Have been waiting for the final decision since then
January 26, 2026: Accepted

(0) 讚！ | 莫曦

Objectively speaking, this magazine is pretty good. The interactive interface is user-friendly, the speed is also not slow. The key is the responsibility of the peer reviewers, whether they can understand and address the concerns of the authors.

(0) 讚！ | 海珊瑚biubiu

10.25 IR (The system invited 59 reviewers for me this week... (and suddenly 3 reviewers came (shivers... soft-hearted reviewers and editors).

(0) 讚！ | yiyi0817

Still no reviewers for the manuscript, it's too slow...

(0) 讚！ | yiyi0817

10.5 Submit
10.5 EA
Currently, 10 out of 11 reviewers invited by AI have declined. I don't know if it's accurate or not.

(0) 讚！ | yiyi0817

25.9.19 Forum open, two minor revisions and one rejection
25.9.26 Revised

(0) 讚！ | Fen1ce

Published on September 25th, 2025.

(0) 讚！ | 林二车娜姆

Submitted on June 28, 2025, feedback and resubmission on June 30, polishing and re-submission on July 1, editing stage, external review on July 1, returned with major revisions on August 11, applied for extension of deadline on August 22, returned for revisions on August 30, second reviewer returned with minor revisions on September 2, external review passed on September 8, accepted on September 11.

(1) 讚！ | 林二车娜姆

25th August 2029 IR

(0) 讚！ | Fen1ce

Please translate the following paragraph into English: 8.24iv

(0) 讚！ | jin

25.8.11 IV
25.8.14 EA

Translation:
25.8.11 IV
25.8.14 EA

(0) 讚！ | Fen1ce

5.27 Submitted for review
6.10 First reviewer
7.7 Second reviewer submitted report, both reviewers requested minor revisions and accepted directly
7.10 Revised
7.15 Accepted
7.24 Published
This was my first submission, and I didn't expect it to go so smoothly. It was accepted in less than two months. I am grateful to this journal, although it is a bit expensive. I hope it can be indexed in the Web of Science soon.
In summary, the most important thing is to find a suitable topic, preferably a new one, and choose editors in a similar field. This can help speed up the submission process.

(0) 讚！ | 飞檐

The distribution editor has been 17 days, and there is still no external review, it's too slow.

(0) 讚！ | 彬

Encountering the deputy editor-in-chief is crucial, as deputy editors from India and Pakistan often push for revisions and directly reject submissions.

(0) 讚！ | w222

Column of a group of scholars in a specific field.

(0) 讚！ | w222

Did you receive it, buddy?

(0) 讚！ | ljdanda

May I ask how things are going now? How long will it take for the manuscript to be sent for external review? It was submitted on October 25th, and there has been one change of handling editor since then. We are currently in the process of inviting reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | 雪子啊

Encountering good reviewers is crucial. One of the reviewers gave a lot of constructive feedback and made many revisions, but the communication was smooth, with responses usually on the same day or the next day. However, the other reviewer was very unprofessional, taking a long time to respond and only giving brief feedback before disappearing. Regardless of the conclusion, a response should be given. This wastes the time of the authors and editors and is very irresponsible.

(0) 讚！ | bosy

May I ask what the newly established research topic is?

(0) 讚！ | 木子易

May I ask what direction of article did you submit? I submitted to the section on nutrition for hypertension. I submitted on July 26th, and it was reviewed externally on August 3rd. I'm not sure if it will be rejected immediately.

(0) 讚！ | hunanhospital

Submission on July 4th, acceptance on August 3rd, the editing efficiency is very very high, the entire process is very smooth. Most likely related to the fact that the associate editor happens to be the topic editor, and it coincides with a newly established research topic.

(3) 讚！ | tanzhic

After submission, the first month had one reviewer who provided feedback. I continued to wait for responses from other reviewers. In the meantime, the journal asked me to recommend reviewers, and I did. After three months passed without finding a reviewer, they rejected my submission, claiming it did not meet the requirements. It's truly absurd that they couldn't find a reviewer for such a long time and instead claimed my article didn't meet the submission requirements. They should have stated that it didn't meet the requirements from the beginning. They wasted four months of my time, which is very irresponsible. I advise being cautious when submitting articles.

(162) 讚！ | 薛点点

How long after the article is published online can it be seen in print?

(0) 讚！ | 渢