Agreement

(0) 讚！ | Kunson

This domestic journal has shown me the disgusting side of the academic circle in China. Two editors gave minor revisions, but they requested that I revise in the form of a letter, otherwise they would reject the submission. The editors' behavior was so disgusting that I decided to withdraw my submission on my own, giving reasons related to my research on lignin. It is highly likely that my research will only be cited in lignin-related studies. It's ridiculous, wasting three months of my time. You should have just rejected it without sending it for external review in the first place. It's all about playing games within the circle. I have submitted to so many journals and have never encountered such a disgusting journal. If you want to submit, consider whether you have funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China, whether you are part of a large team, and whether you have connections.

(0) 讚！ | Kunson

All are related.

(0) 讚！ | 越来越慢的投稿_

Are low-quality journals still relying on the quantity of work rather than connections?

(0) 讚！ | yijinsha

The forestry peer reviewers are relatively slow in giving their feedback.

(0) 讚！ | chenqwx

This journal is all about networking. One hundred articles per year. Just for the sake of boosting the impact factor.

(0) 讚！ | xiaoleeya

I just finished revising and got rejected, feeling really nauseous.

(0) 讚！ | xiaoleeya

Why was it rejected even after the major revision?

(0) 讚！ | 越来越慢的投稿_

After major revisions, the manuscript was rejected, with a lengthy turnaround time of 6 months. When resubmitting, language polishing was requested, and all requirements were met, only to be rejected again in the end. It's a total rip-off.

(0) 讚！ | seven-ibcas

How are things going?

(0) 讚！ | 越来越慢的投稿_

It has been over 40 days.

(0) 讚！ | 越来越慢的投稿_

After three days of investment, it dipped. What's going on? Is it going to cool down?

(0) 讚！ | 叶子

Submitted, accepted after revision.
There were four reviewers, fortunately all foreigners, so it didn't feel like it was sent to domestic peers. My circle is very small and narrow, otherwise the probability of rejection would be high.
The editor, who is probably the chief editor, also raised two questions, making a total of five reviewers.
The questions raised were very constructive and greatly improved the overall quality of the paper.
After the first round of revisions, two reviewers pointed out some minor language issues, and I was given 7 days to make the changes.
After the second round of revisions, the paper was accepted directly.

However, please note: there was a wait of over two months between acceptance and online publication.

(0) 讚！ | 吴法天

I was also DIPed very quickly, what's the situation with the two brothers upstairs?

(0) 讚！ | Jiuhong Chen

What comes next?

(0) 讚！ | 越来越慢的投稿_

The review process is really terrible, extremely slow, and just procrastinating.

(0) 讚！ | xiaoleeya

Submitted at 7:30, still under review now. The peer review process of this journal is really slow, the reviewers seem to be doing nothing.

(0) 讚！ | xiaoleeya

What are the follow-up results?

(0) 讚！ | 2026accept

Excuse me, how long have you been dipping? It's my second day with the editor and almost a week since I started dipping on the third day.

(0) 讚！ | luoyongjian

The day after it was launched, it dipped. Does anyone know what's going on?

(0) 讚！ | nnjcuimg

Submission on March 25, 2025
Returned for revision on April 16, 2025
Revised on May 11, 2025
Returned for second revision on May 22, 2025
Revised on June 19, 2025
Reviewed by editor on June 22, 2025
Decision in process on July 7, 2025
Accepted on July 10, 2025

(0) 讚！ | ggggggggg

I'm sorry, "tinghao" does not have a direct translation in English. Can you provide more context or information so I can better understand and assist you with the translation?

(0) 讚！ | czb123

In 2025, the new district is TOP, with few publications and uneven quality of journal articles. The quality will definitely improve in the future, so it's okay to just submit based on quantity of work.

(0) 讚！ | tuoxie

The first submission was rejected and resubmitted, while the second submission was accepted after major revisions. The review process is now quite fast, not as slow as it used to be. Both submissions were under review for around 20 days.

(0) 讚！ | Starryaqua

The quality of the journal has been improving year by year.

(0) 讚！ | xiaoleeya