Sorry, you need to check in the researcher sources to see if it has been submitted for review.

(0) 讚！ | pp301

1. Submitted on January 14th.
2. Revised on February 18th with five reviewers: three minor revisions, one rejection, and one major revision.
3. Resubmitted after major revisions on March 4th.
4. Peer review on March 5th.
It is already March 25th and still in peer review, during which the journal has also lowered its impact factor.

(0) 讚！ | zxdfacai

Submitted on 25th March 2017
Editor assigned on 25th March 2020, and then there was no progress. What happened to the promised 3.5 days for the editor to make the first decision?

(0) 讚！ | pp301

The three districts have been downgraded now, and the newly submitted district has also been downgraded. It's too difficult.

(0) 讚！ | waa.

I am also this editor.

(0) 讚！ | waa.

On December 18, 2024, submitted
On January 17, 2025, received reviewer comments, with 5 reviewers providing nearly 50 comments - 2 minor revisions and 3 major revisions, along with editorial suggestions
On February 11, 2025, returned revised manuscript for review
On February 12, 2025, first round of reviewer comments accepted, followed by around 10 formatting suggestions from the editor
On February 13, 2025, submitted revised manuscript
On February 14, 2025, second round of reviewer comments accepted, with 3 additional formatting suggestions related to the Special Issue (SI)
On February 15, 2025, submitted revised manuscript
On February 17, 2025, accepted for publication
The editor, Ned Bowden, worked very quickly throughout the process - gratitude!

(0) 讚！ | 。。.

This journal is good. I just received a paper today, with 5 reviewers and many comments from the editor. It is very professional and rigorous. It is indeed an ACS journal, with very high requirements from formatting to content.

(0) 讚！ | Klose

The editor is Ned Bowden, and the system has been showing "Received" all along. I thought it hadn't been processed, but today I received feedback from three reviewers directly, so I guess the review status in the system was not updated. The overall review process was very quick!

(0) 讚！ | Starmoon

Hello, editor, please avoid lightning.

(0) 讚！ | asdSdf

It has been 20 days since submission, and the status in the ACS Publishing Center system has always been "Received". I have never encountered this situation with previous submissions.

(0) 讚！ | Starmoon

Get it done before the end of the year. Good job!

(0) 讚！ | 是张小花

The review comments have come back on January 6, 2025, with a total of 10 comments from two reviewers and the editor. Thankful for the journal's perseverance!

(0) 讚！ | 十二月天

Hello, I wanted to ask if the status of your paper has changed. Thank you.

(0) 讚！ | yyiyiyi

The external review has been nearly four months, and I have urged for revisions three or four times. The editorial assistant replied that they are still waiting to receive enough review comments. During this period, two other papers submitted were already accepted, but this one is still stuck in the review process. It is very frustrating. Regardless of the outcome, I hope the progress can be faster!

(0) 讚！ | 十二月天

I have sent two emails to the editor, and the assistants said they would reply soon. However, it has been over half a month and I still haven't received a response. Oh well!

(0) 讚！ | 十二月天

10.28 Submission to the chief editor, then assigned to the associate editor
11.4 Peer review
11.26 Response to four reviewers - two major revisions, two minor revisions, and two requests for additional data
12.10 R1 submission
12.11 Editor provided feedback, requested one more data and many formatting suggestions - minor revision
12.18 R2 submission
12.19 Accept
The overall process was very fast. Thanks to the reviewers and editors for their diligence and responsibility. It's true that "your speed determines the editor's speed". It took 52 days. Hope this information helps you. 
Wishing the journal continued success!!!

(0) 讚！ | 大肥猫.

Do you think this journal can maintain its status as a second-tier journal next year? I heard that it will be reclassified in February 2025.

(0) 讚！ | shuier

The additional text on the cover will incur an additional charge.

(0) 讚！ | duofawenz

Don't rush to submit, especially slow, one review takes a month. Haven't heard anything for 20 days after minor revisions were submitted.

(0) 讚！ | qweasdzxc

Transferred from AMI on November 24, 2024, and still in the hands of the editor. Isn't the review process supposed to be quick?

(1) 讚！ | dada@123

Hello, have you accepted the cover invitation? Is there a specific charge for it?

(0) 讚！ | lucky girl6145

Hey buddy, will they send an email after the review? I was also assigned the same editor as you on the 25th, and my paper is still in their hands...

(0) 讚！ | 研究生一枚

8.27 Submission
8.30 Editor assignment and peer review
11.01 First round of revisions, 3 reviewers, one minor revision, two major revisions, with 20 days allowed
11.19 Revisions submitted
11.22 Acceptance

(1) 讚！ | Mark。

This journal has a fast distribution of editors and reviewers. It took me 2 months for the first review, with three reviewers, but it was accepted just 3 days after submission. The subsequent process was incredibly fast.

(0) 讚！ | Mark。

20241125 sub
20241127 指定副编辑（T. Randall Lee教授）
20241128 副编辑（Nikhil Jana教授）

(0) 讚！ | 是张小花