| 期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱 | Aerospace LetPub Score 7.2
50 ratings
Rate
Reputation 7.7 Influence 6.1 Speed 7.7 | ||||||||||||||||
| 期刊簡稱 | AEROSPACE-BASEL | ||||||||||||||||
| ISSN | 2226-4310 | ||||||||||||||||
| h-index | N.A. | ||||||||||||||||
| CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||
| 自引率 (2023-2024) | 23.80%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||
| 掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||
| 官方網站 | https://www.mdpi.com/journal/aerospace | ||||||||||||||||
| 在線稿件提交 | |||||||||||||||||
| 開放訪問 | Yes | ||||||||||||||||
| 出版商 | MDPI | ||||||||||||||||
| 主題領域 | ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE | ||||||||||||||||
| 出版國/地區 | SWITZERLAND | ||||||||||||||||
| 發行頻率 | |||||||||||||||||
| 創刊年 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
| 每年文章數 | 1049每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||
| 黃金OA百分比 | 99.97% | ||||||||||||||||
OA Related Info![]() | APC: Yes( CHF2400; ) APC waiver:Check Notes Other charges: No Keywords: aerodynamics、plasmas、aeroacoustics、flight mechanics、airport design Useful LinksAims & ScopeAuthor InstructionsEditorial BoardAnonymous peer review | ||||||||||||||||
| Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q2
| ||||||||||||||||
| 索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||
| 鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=2226-4310%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||
| 平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: 6 Weeks | ||||||||||||||||
| 競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: | ||||||||||||||||
| 參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||
| *所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
| |
| 首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
| [Aerospace] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
| 作者: 丢了找不着 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-19 22:51:00 評論於 The whole process took less than two months, with the Chinese New Year holiday in between. I delayed for a week during the first return for repairs, otherwise it could have been published online in just one month. |
| 作者: 早睡早起 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-11-16 20:54:30 評論於 2025.9.22 Manuscript Submitted & Pending review 2025.9.23 Under review 2025.10.20 Pending major revisions 2025.10.29 Resubmitted 2025.10.29 Revised version review 2025.11.14 Pending editor decision 2025.11.14 Paper accepted 2025.11.16 Website online |
| 作者: RedOrangeZz 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-10-16 23:21:06 評論於 9.9 submitted 10.2 major revision (two reviewers, one has no major comments; one suggests adding more experiments) 10.12 revised (editor gave ten days for revisions) 10.14 accepted 10.16 published |
| 作者: L J 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-19 11:02:38 評論於 Is the submission for a special issue? |
| 作者: microgravity 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-08-10 11:34:44 評論於 Submitted on July 23, under review the same afternoon. Received first round of comments on August 7, minor revisions requested. Editor decision: accept in current form. Received revision requests on August 8. Accepted on August 10. |
| 作者: qibaoqing 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-07-22 19:48:48 評論於 It took 55 days for me to receive the first-instance opinion. |
| 作者: leeps 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-07-21 15:50:42 評論於 I don't know why it's been two months and we still haven't received the first review result for the abstract journal. |
| 作者: 小辣按时毕业 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-07-16 18:20:43 評論於 7.6 to be published Mistake in writing |
| 作者: 小辣按时毕业 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-07-16 18:18:11 評論於 5.30 submission 6.25 major revision (53 comments from 4 reviewers, requiring completion within 10 days) 7.4 morning submission 7.4 afternoon minor revision (1 minor comment) 7.5 acceptance 7.7 publication |
| 作者: 罗小本_lxb 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-25 17:58:21 評論於 The reviewers of this journal are very strict, their comments are professional and serious, and they even require additional experiments for revisions. If I had experiments, I would have submitted to a higher-level journal from the beginning, but in the end, I still had to supplement it, at least it is a Q2 journal. From the process and reviewers' comments, it is not considered a low-quality journal, so I still need to write carefully. |
| 作者: www21 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-04-12 15:47:46 評論於 Last year, after hitting a wall with my one-year-long submission to top journals, I realized the reality and decided to submit two articles at once. Both were accepted around January, and they were relatively simple journals. |
| 作者: y_hq 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-03-06 14:15:59 評論於 Just want to ask, how long does it take to enter the review stage? It has been a week and it has been in the waiting for review status all along. |
| 作者: 傻狍子爱学习 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2024-12-17 18:57:16 評論於 MDPI's speed is really fast. Submitted on October 22, 2024; Received major revisions on November 18, with two reviewers providing a total of 11 comments, with a deadline of 10 days for response; Uploaded revised version on November 28; Received major revisions again on December 2, with both reviewers giving a rating of 5Yes, but one raised two questions, with a deadline of 7 days for response; Uploaded again on December 8, with minor changes to the manuscript mainly addressing the reviewers' concerns, totaling six to seven pages of revisions; Accepted on December 13, with editing for English language and separate submission of images, followed by final review confirmation; payment made on the 14th. Published online on December 15. |
| 作者: Ernest.S 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2024-10-30 13:42:32 評論於 Three and a half months Five reviewers The requirements for the article are still very strict. |
| 作者: YiMing Liu 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2024-10-01 17:40:58 評論於 Submission experience: Submitted on August 16th Received revision comments on September 25th Submitted revised version on September 29th Received acceptance notice on September 30th |
| 作者: ugly-黄 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2024-09-25 20:39:30 評論於 Submitted on 8/24 Received feedback on 9/16 Submitted revised version on 9/19 Received acceptance notification on 9/25, exactly one month, very fast. |
| 作者: 巴啦啦不亮 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-08-26 11:37:54 評論於 Please return to the first-instance opinion on August 15th. Make revisions and resubmit on August 23rd. |
| 作者: 巴啦啦不亮 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-08-08 18:43:16 評論於 Submitted on 7.31, outcome unknown. |
| 作者: zzingok 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2024-06-25 19:23:25 評論於 Hello, I have completed one major revision and one minor revision. Both reviewers have given a "yes". The status was changed to "pending editor decision" on 6.22. It has been 3 days and there hasn't been any changes. How long did you wait for acceptance? |
| 作者: 凯哥哥哥 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-06-23 21:23:22 評論於 Boss, what direction are you in? |
| 作者: 云飞扬@ 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2024-06-18 09:25:45 評論於 received date: 26 March 2024 revised date: 24 May 2024 accepted date: 11 June 2024 submission to first decision (days): 75 |
| 作者: 云飞扬@ 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2024-06-18 09:24:30 評論於 Second review in 10 days, directly accepted after minor revision |
| 作者: 云飞扬@ 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2024-06-18 09:24:02 評論於 In the first review, there were three reviewers, and it took 35 days. There were more than thirty comments in total, with two reviewers being young peers and very professional, providing targeted comments, while one senior peer provided more general feedback. Special thanks to the second reviewer, who wrote a lengthy evaluation and provided 19 targeted comments, which were very difficult to respond to. This reviewer definitely read the article thoroughly from start to finish (feeling like it might be rejected or require major revisions). The questions raised ranged from the introduction to the experiments to the analysis and conclusion. Never before had such meticulous reviewers been encountered, and after reading the review comments, there was a feeling of being touched and almost moved to tears. Truly, fellow researchers, have you ever experienced that feeling of being earnestly considered by a reviewer? At that moment, it was decided that regardless of rejection or acceptance by the reviewers, every question from the reviewers must be earnestly addressed. We must not shirk our responsibility when others are being responsible towards us. Therefore, we hurried to conduct additional experiments, added mathematical derivations, supplemented with more analysis and discussion, and focused solely on this task, sleeping only 6 hours a day. It took more than 20 days to respond to the over thirty comments, but after making the revisions, the article indeed saw significant improvements, becoming more persuasive and pleasing to the eye, and there was a sense of satisfaction |
| 作者: 舞动的白杨 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2024-06-17 20:57:19 評論於 Please translate the following passage into English and Japanese, and title them ":" and ":" |
| 作者: 舞动的白杨 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2024-06-17 20:55:24 評論於 Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and title them ":" and ":" |
| 首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
Contact us