| 期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱 | ACTA MATERIALIA LetPub Score 9.4
58 ratings
Rate
Reputation 9.8 Influence 9.2 Speed 8.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 期刊簡稱 | ACTA MATER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ISSN | 1359-6454 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| h-index | 252 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 自引率 (2023-2024) | 7.20%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 官方網站 | https://www.journals.elsevier.com/acta-materialia | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 在線稿件提交 | https://www.editorialmanager.com/AM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 開放訪問 | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 出版商 | Elsevier Ltd | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 主題領域 | 工程技术 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 出版國/地區 | UNITED STATES | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 發行頻率 | 月2回刊行 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 創刊年 | 1996 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 每年文章數 | 962每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 黃金OA百分比 | 29.11% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q1
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1359-6454%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: About 2.8 month(s) 來自Elsevier的數據: Average 5.2 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: Very difficult | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| *所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| |
| 首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
| [ACTA MATERIALIA] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
| 作者: WWW6 領域: 材料科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-08-13 21:43:13 評論於 Any news? How long will the decision take now? Share it with me. |
| 作者: 早日毕业呀! 領域: 材料科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-08-13 09:51:54 評論於 The aditor has been with us for over half a month since the end of July, why has it taken so long? |
| 作者: 俺中嘞~ 領域: 材料科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-08-07 11:38:49 評論於 8.7 With Editor |
| 作者: 你看我居然 領域: 材料科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-07-28 14:18:44 評論於 Hello, how are you doing? We should have submitted our articles around the same time, but there have been no updates after two changes in the WD. |
| 作者: closer0414 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-07-25 09:02:37 評論於 Has the status changed? |
| 作者: Gin 領域: 材料科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-07-22 16:15:44 評論於 Most people in the field of materials are familiar with Acta. I believe that even in the field of catalysis, it is unlikely that there will be a situation where peers have not heard of Acta and think that CEJ is better than Acta. |
| 作者: 羊想天堂 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-07-22 13:55:33 評論於 I didn't receive the email assigning an editor. |
| 作者: 羊想天堂 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-07-22 13:54:39 評論於 I think CEJ would be better. If you are applying for a scholarship, especially the Qing Foundation, usually more junior peers will review your application. In this case, they may not necessarily know about acta. On the other hand, if you are mainly focusing on metal materials in your application, acta would definitely be more useful. |
| 作者: closer0414 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-07-22 08:16:12 評論於 Agreed, thank you! |
| 作者: 咚咚鹏 領域: 材料科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-07-22 06:35:25 評論於 Have you received the email from the assigned editor? |
| 作者: 咚咚鹏 領域: 材料科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-07-22 06:33:30 評論於 Has the corresponding author received the email from the assigned editor? |
| 作者: 羊想天堂 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-07-21 23:44:36 評論於 I submitted my article on the 9th and the status has remained unchanged, it is still with the editor. |
| 作者: 你看我居然 領域: 材料科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-07-21 20:49:46 評論於 How is the situation now, OP? |
| 作者: 你看我居然 領域: 材料科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-07-21 19:29:02 評論於 On July 1st, I submitted my manuscript close to midnight. Later that day, it showed "with editor". On July 16th and July 18th, the status changed twice to "with editor", but it still did not show "under review". Has anyone experienced a similar situation? Thank you! |
| 作者: 我愿潇洒如鹰 領域: 材料科学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2026-07-21 18:13:02 評論於 Acta is generally considered better, even for catalysis. |
| 作者: closer0414 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-07-21 09:22:42 評論於 There is another issue that the material I work with is non-metallic and is used in metal batteries. I am not sure if it is suitable for submission to Acta. Would CEJ be a better fit? Any suggestions are welcome. |
| 作者: closer0414 領域: 化学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-07-21 09:09:00 評論於 Which one is better for submitting to, Acta or CEJ in terms of photocatalysis? The quality of Acta seems higher than CEJ, but CEJ has a higher impact factor. However, I am afraid that CEJ may drop in rank. |
| 作者: GodBlessUs 領域: 计算机科学 審稿時間: 2.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-07-16 18:01:03 評論於 May I ask how far along we are with the current manuscript number? |
| 作者: 亚 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-07-16 12:25:12 評論於 Record 7.14 WE. |
| 作者: OneRzzZ 領域: 材料科学 審稿時間: 7.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2026-06-20 22:04:18 評論於 November 14, 2025 Submitted January 6, 2026 Rejected January 29 Appeal January 30 Decision rescinded to major revision March 9 Revised April 10 Major revision May 13 Revised June 20 Accepted |
| 作者: Xavier0620 領域: 材料科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-06-18 15:30:05 評論於 6.16 Under Review |
| 作者: Xavier0620 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-06-15 16:24:22 評論於 It's still WE, stuck at 6.1. |
| 作者: Azreal 領域: 材料科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-06-11 15:45:29 評論於 How is it going? It's been almost a month, has it been submitted for review? |
| 作者: wbnl 領域: 工程技术 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-06-03 16:15:01 評論於 Yes, as you can see from the communication, I have been at WE for over half a month now. |
| 作者: Xavier0620 領域: 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-06-02 12:27:21 評論於 Can't see it yet, is it only the corresponding author who will receive the email? I haven't received it in my own mailbox. |
| 首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
Contact us