Does this journal charge publication fees?

(0) 讚！ | 小珊珊

Back to district one now.

(0) 讚！ | 涂瑞得

Blind insertion, return to zone one. Good luck ahead.

(0) 讚！ | 11111_10

After the first major revision and resubmission following the rejection, we received two revisions and one rejection from the editor. After arguing our case, we made further modifications and resubmitted the paper. It is currently under review and a decision is expected within a week. We hope it will be accepted this time, as this paper has been very time-consuming. Please spare us, reviewers, and help us out. We don't want to delay graduation any further!

(0) 讚！ | 涂瑞得

The first review took two months, with three reviewers providing major revisions - two positive and one negative. The second review took one month for minor revisions. The reviewers' comments were very professional, supporting the national journal and hoping for its continuous improvement.

(0) 讚！ | xxr007

How long does it take for the proof to go online after submission? Why does it feel like the online speed is a bit slow?

(0) 讚！ | mockerfer

How is the online speed of your EEM article after proofreading? It has been four weeks since I submitted my proof and it is still stuck at the editorial office without being sent to the publisher = =

(0) 讚！ | Nlm

What's going on, explain

(0) 讚！ | 本来无一物

Stupid journal

(2) 讚！ | ssssssaaa

A self-indulgent open-source journal, with over 20,000, so the editors are working hard to promote and make money.

(0) 讚！ | gkjsl

Dozens of articles in a year, can they be called journals? Just playing with IF values? It's better to just publish one article and find a hundred people to apply it, then it will be a hundred, hilarious.

(2) 讚！ | JS-UH

I also switched my investment, and I need to upload a table of contents. What is this?

(0) 讚！ | 高山流水与

Regarding the value of IF (Impact Factor) and the influence it holds, not many people have heard of it. You can take a look at the article above, most of the citations are from reviews, and the research citations are generally below 5. Basically, it is just those few people who keep investing.

(0) 讚！ | 是豆豆啊

Does he worth 3000 dollars?

(0) 讚！ | gkjsl

4 reviewers, 2 minor revisions, 1 major revision, 1 rejection. The reviewer who rejected it probably didn't read the article carefully and just raised a few simple questions before rejecting it. It's probably someone with a grudge. The editor decided to reject it. I'm too lazy to appeal.

(0) 讚！ | 是豆豆啊

I still don't know, still reviewing.

(0) 讚！ | 是豆豆啊

Transfer to AFM, the direction is not very relevant either. How is the review result now, did you get it?

(0) 讚！ | zjrzjrzjr

4.19 pending decision and under review coexist until 5.9 when under review disappears, leaving only PD.

(0) 讚！ | 是豆豆啊

Is it really this slow? I've been in the hands of the editor for a week already, and they still haven't made a decision quickly.

(0) 讚！ | 是豆豆啊

I transferred from AFM and when I clicked on it, it turned out to be an invited manuscript. It's a bit strange because it doesn't align with the scope of this journal. I don't know why they asked for this transfer.

(0) 讚！ | 是豆豆啊

I submitted it on July 10th and it has been pending decision and under review... Is it normal to wait for three months?

(4) 讚！ | yangkls

Two reviewers, one gave high praise, stating that my work is novel and interesting, and recommended acceptance. The other reviewer believed that my work lacks innovation and listed several papers that had been done before. However, the papers listed were not in the same application area as mine, and the materials were different. Only the methods were slightly similar. I can only say that I'm unlucky. I feel nauseous and upset about being rejected...

(3) 讚！ | 拉粑粑小魔仙

This journal will soon be published as Open Access in January 2023. Starting from August 2022, manuscript submissions will require an Article Processing Charge if they are accepted and published in the journal. For more details on the fees, please click here.

(2) 讚！ | 笑忘书

After experiencing rejections from Angew, EES, and Nanoletters, my advisor decided to try submitting to this journal.
6.9 submitted
7.25 received feedback with two reviewers, one provided 6 comments and the other requested language and grammar optimization, the editor made minor revisions.
7.31 spent 5 days revising and submitting responses to the feedback.
8.01 paper accepted, requested high-resolution images and submitted formal acceptance.
This work started submitting in October 2021 and went through rejections from Angew and EES, and after answering 38 questions from 5 reviewers for Nanoletters, it was rejected. After multiple revisions, it was finally smoothly accepted by EEM. I thought I would be excited when it was accepted, but in reality, I didn't feel any emotions. This work has been tormenting me for over two years, and it finally went out. I originally planned that if EEM rejected it, I would continue conducting experiments, supplementing the experiments, and rewriting this article. Therefore, I only felt a sense of relief in my heart, without any joy.
This is the first article with an impact factor greater than 10 from our group, without any background connections. My advisor said that our work is definitely worthy of better opportunities, but some things cannot be forced. I hope we can strive to produce better work in the future!

(43) 讚！ | 崽崽今天中Nature了么？

After thinking for a long time, I decided to post the rejection reasons, to help everyone avoid similar mistakes.

Reason: The responses to the questions were good, but the article's topic does not match the theme of this issue of the journal, so I am sorry.

(17) 讚！ | 小千