| 期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱 | European Urology Open Science LetPub Score 4.4
50 ratings
Rate
Reputation 5.4 Influence 3.1 Speed 7.0 | ||||||||||||||||
| 期刊簡稱 | EUR UROL OPEN SCI | ||||||||||||||||
| ISSN | 2666-1691 | ||||||||||||||||
| E-ISSN | 2666-1683 | ||||||||||||||||
| h-index | N.A. | ||||||||||||||||
| CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||
| 自引率 (2023-2024) | 3.10%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||
| 掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||
| 官方網站 | https://www.journals.elsevier.com/european-urology-open-science | ||||||||||||||||
| 在線稿件提交 | |||||||||||||||||
| 開放訪問 | Yes | ||||||||||||||||
| 出版商 | ELSEVIER | ||||||||||||||||
| 主題領域 | UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY | ||||||||||||||||
| 出版國/地區 | NETHERLANDS | ||||||||||||||||
| 發行頻率 | |||||||||||||||||
| 創刊年 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
| 每年文章數 | 135每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||
| 黃金OA百分比 | 96.88% | ||||||||||||||||
OA Related Info | APC: Yes（ USD1800; ） APC waiver：Check Notes Other charges: No Keywords: urology、oncology、impotence、infertility、pediatrics、lithiasis Useful LinksAims & ScopeAuthor InstructionsEditorial BoardAnonymous peer review | ||||||||||||||||
| Web of Science 四分位 （ 2023-2024） | WOS Quartile: Q1
| ||||||||||||||||
| 索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||
| 鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=2666-1691%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||
| 平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: 17 Weeks | ||||||||||||||||
| 競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: | ||||||||||||||||
| 參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||
| *所有的審稿過程指標，如接受率和審稿速度，僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此，這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
| |
| 首頁 上一頁 1 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
| [European Urology Open Science] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
| 作者: 宋游 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 1.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2025-02-05 12:33:27 評論於 The EU Pure OA journal for youngsters, a single-center retrospective study of special disease types, was not recommended for submission through transfer. There was no recommended reviewer on the system, and after 1 week, it was sent to 4 reviewers, with 2 accepting and 1 completing the review. Results: Rejection, the reviewers were not very thorough, it seemed like they only read the abstract. It took about a month to complete, which is relatively fast. It is recommended to go through the transfer route rather than submitting directly, as editors may not give it much attention.  (0) 讚！ | 宋游  |
| 首頁 上一頁 1 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
Contact us