Submitted on February 14th, 25, with editor on February 21st, out for review on February 28th, major revision on March 23rd with two reviewer comments, given six months for revisions, supplemented with two additional studies, revised on August 3rd. This time, with editor for two months, received feedback on November 2nd with the first two reviewers agreeing to publish without comments, and an additional reviewer requesting many psychological indicators to be added. Another major revision was done, taking one month, revised on December 6th, out for review on December 9th, decision pending on the same day. Accepted directly on December 11th, indicating that each round of revisions was well-done. Previous submissions were all rejected instantly, suggesting that the journal values innovation.

(1) 讚！ | 卢卡

Recording the submission process
2025-06-03 Submitted
2025-06-04 With editor
2025-06-05 Out for review

(0) 讚！ | CKeY

Submit two articles before and after, the speed of review and rejection is fast, it usually takes about 4 days to decide whether to review, and if not, it is directly desk rejected. The first submission was reviewed after 4 days, and the second submission was rejected after 4 days. 
After the review, the average speed of each round of review is one month. We have gone through two rounds of review in total, and there is sufficient time for revisions, with a revision period of 3 months. 
In the end, one of our articles took less than 6 months from submission to acceptance. 
Overall, it is great and should be ranked second only to the top three journals in the field of tourism management. It is an authoritative journal where many influential figures in the tourism industry publish their works.

(1) 讚！ | Mini-frog