On April 25, 2025, we received feedback from experts regarding the major overhaul. One expert provided moderate suggestions with no significant issues, while another expert gave a lengthy list of over 20 suggestions. Some of these suggestions are quite challenging to address. Although this expert appears to be well-versed in the field, there may be some misunderstandings about our work. It will be a huge challenge for us to correct these biases. We will do our best to make adjustments, but for the rest, we can only hope for good luck!

(0) 讚！ | 一抹绯红

2025.4.23 RRC, both reviewers have completed the review and hope to have a chance for revisions.

(0) 讚！ | 一抹绯红

One person completed, one person is reviewing, hoping for good luck!

(0) 讚！ | 一抹绯红

Can I ask why it was rejected after two rounds of revisions? Did it not meet the requirements of the reviewers?

(0) 讚！ | dfgsdgdgsdgd

The editor-in-chief is French, with a quick response time and a relatively warm email reply. Although the article was rejected after 2 rounds of revisions (possibly due to the experimental process of the psychology journal, it may be better to be more complete and standardized), it is a bit regrettable. However, I will still consider submitting again.

(0) 讚！ | 清一色自摸三家

Although the impact factor is the lowest in the Part series, it is undoubtedly a top journal in the field of transportation behavior and psychology. I have submitted two papers before, both of which were desk rejections. I have just submitted a paper in the field of intelligent driving, with the note:
2025.02.16 Invited 2+ reviewers, 2 accepted for review.
Let's give it a try, the difficulty is definitely great, good luck!

(0) 讚！ | 一抹绯红

Why was it rejected?

(0) 讚！ | dfgsdgdgsdgd

7.25 Returned
7.28 submitted to journal

(0) 讚！ | lzjtucwx

7.22 提交到期刊

(0) 讚！ | lzjtucwx

7.22 提交到期刊

(0) 讚！ | lzjtucwx

It's been 10 days since submission, and it's still showing as "submitted to journal." The processing speed seems a bit slow.

(0) 讚！ | lzjtucwx

Please submit by August 17th.
1st round review by January 10th.
2nd round review by June 20th.

(0) 讚！ | andy_intr

One of the reviewers is the associate editor and provided many insightful comments

(0) 讚！ | AOO

Submitted on February 26
Received first review comments by the end of March
Received second review comments in early June
Accepted for publication after revisions
The process was very fast, the editors were very responsible, and the reviewers' questions were very insightful, greatly improving the article

(0) 讚！ | AOO

Un buen y popular diario en Factores Humanos/Ergonomía. Tomó dos rondas de revisiones durante 3 meses y 4 meses, respectivamente. No quedé completamente satisfecho con su rapidez en la revisión, pero actuaron muy rápidamente en cuanto a la publicación.

(0) 讚！ | AlanZ

How many reviewers has the journal assigned in total? Will the reviewers be changed or additional reviewers be added during the second review? Thank you!

(0) 讚！ | XLLZY

The first review process took more than 3 months, and after minor revisions in the second review, it was accepted 1 week later. The whole process from submission to acceptance lasted over 6 months.

(22) 讚！ | yi