The chief editor handled it promptly, taking a total of 45 days.

(0) 讚！ | 红色桃子

6.7 submission Now still WE

(0) 讚！ | littlefishss

26.05.08 STJ
26.05.09 WE
26.05.10 UR
26.06.27 RRC
26.07.05 RRC

May 26, 2008 STJ
May 26, 2009 WE
May 26, 2010 UR
June 27, 2006 RRC
July 5, 2006 RRC

(0) 讚！ | Yangyang9264

Submission: 10-June
With editor: 10-June
Still with editor

(0) 讚！ | MT

Please process the edits to win, some on a monthly basis.

(0) 讚！ | ZBiao

6.2 submissions, so far WE

(0) 讚！ | ZBiao

4.19 submitted to STJ
4.24 under review
6.1 received major revision with nearly forty comments from two reviewers
6.24 submitted revised manuscript in the evening, accepted by the editor-in-chief four hours later without further review
Overall, the journal's efficiency is very high! One submission is enough.

(0) 讚！ | 谢棒

Yesterday revised, accepted directly early this morning. From submission to acceptance only took 26 days. Thank you to the editor-in-chief for the incredibly high efficiency!!!

(0) 讚！ | Sakana_

The processing of STJ and WE stages was very fast, but the UR stage was delayed by reviewers, with three reviewers providing over 20 suggestions. The editing efficiency was very high!

(1) 讚！ | HHH_

The major revision was given on 20260514, with 3 reviewers assigned and a deadline of 21 days.

(0) 讚！ | Docter Wei

Three reviewers provided about 15 comments on the manuscript, all of which were mostly positive. A 21-day period was given for revisions.

(0) 讚！ | Sakana_

I asked customer service, and they said that it is normal within RRC30. They suggested to wait for a couple of days and then check again.

(0) 讚！ | Docter Wei

Early this morning, an email was sent regarding a major overhaul, as stated on the official website to revise.

(0) 讚！ | Sakana_

If it's been two weeks and there's still no response from RRC, I think we should consider writing a letter to follow up.

(0) 讚！ | Sakana_

Until now, the time and situation have not changed. Three people have finished reviewing, while three people have not made any progress.

(0) 讚！ | Docter Wei

Today in the email, it was confirmed that 2 manuscripts have been reviewed, and in the app it also shows 2. It is still RRC.

(0) 讚！ | Sakana_

Hello, may I ask how was the issue resolved in the end? I also cannot see the reviewers' comments.

(0) 讚！ | HHH_

There are still 3 left to review and their status has not changed.

(0) 讚！ | Docter Wei

After reviewing the three, the editor should be able to make a decision.

(0) 讚！ | Sakana_

6 reviews have been completed, 3 of them have been completed, and so far it is still RRC.

(0) 讚！ | Docter Wei

The second reviewer completed the review on May 7th and it has been revised to RRC.

(0) 讚！ | Sakana_

The editor invited over 30 reviewers, initially accepting 6. After 5 days, 2 reviews were completed, making it RRC. Now, 1 more review has been completed, but there are still 3 reviewers who have not responded. Currently, it remains RRC.

(0) 讚！ | Docter Wei

Is the review process so fast? The editor assigned 28 reviewers to me, currently two have accepted, and one has already completed the review in less than half a day.

(0) 讚！ | Sakana_

Now it is still RRC.

(0) 讚！ | Docter Wei

The speed is really fast, I submitted it yesterday noon, and it was directly under review early this morning. The editor is so efficient.

(0) 讚！ | Sakana_