What's the word of mouth?

(0) 讚！ | yishanliu

It is like this, because journal systems usually automatically request a revised manuscript submission (RRC) when feedback from 2 reviewers is received. However, in most cases, editors invite more reviewers, leading to a status of under review (UR) instead.

(0) 讚！ | yishanliu

Received at Editorial Office 16 Dec 2025
Article revised 28 Jan 2026
Accepted 8 Feb 2026

(0) 讚！ | jay_j

Yes, double-blind.

(0) 讚！ | Mingjian Chen

How have you been lately? I am back under review again.

(0) 讚！ | mokaka

It's been almost ten days, is that normal?

(0) 讚！ | 吉朵

Has anyone become "under review" after being RRC? I have never encountered this situation before.

(0) 讚！ | Wxr

After I rebooted, I switched to a few different browsers and logged in again, and it seemed to have solved the issue.

(0) 讚！ | 朱毓

Hello, do we need to log in through the organization to submit articles on the new system? Why does the submission page keep redirecting? Can someone kindly provide an answer? Urgent!

(0) 讚！ | 上进秋秋

Please login again in a while and check, you need to choose whether to publish a preprint in the final step. This was not displayed earlier due to a bug.

(0) 讚！ | VVstar

I have also encountered such a situation, have you resolved your issue?

(0) 讚！ | lanshuo

Is there anyone who got stuck at the final step of the new submission system, choosing data availability? I have filled in all the information, but it still shows as incomplete. Can someone kindly provide some guidance? Thank you very much ?

(0) 讚！ | VVstar

Speed is fine, but the reputation is deteriorating.

(0) 讚！ | zittty

Can I ask if this journal is double-blind?

(0) 讚！ | 看我眼色行事

This is the fastest comment section I have ever seen.

(0) 讚！ | 落坨翔子

How did it turn out?

(0) 讚！ | 微尘

I would like to ask if there is still a word count requirement recently. Is less than 11,000 words acceptable? Should the recommended reviewer be mentioned in the cover letter?

(0) 讚！ | 讨厌dip

I was also asked to explain the innovative points, polish the language, and recommend reviewers. I want to know if I should directly modify my own paper, or compile all the changes into one document and respond one by one, like a revision.

(0) 讚！ | nana

I also need to explain the innovation points and recommend reviewers, as well as language polishing; I want to know if I should directly modify my own paper, or create a document and reply to each point one by one, like revisions.

(0) 讚！ | nana

I also need to explain the innovative points and recommend reviewers, as well as language polishing; I want to know if it is necessary to respond to each modification directly in my paper.

(0) 讚！ | nana

The speed is quite fast.

Submitted on 2025.10.15
Editorial request for innovative points and recommended reviewers on 10.16
Submitted to the editor on 10.17
Under review on 10.20
The first reviewer has completed the evaluation on 10.21

(0) 讚！ | Colin-220

Submitted on September 10th, the outcome is unknown.

(0) 讚！ | 萝卜搬运工

I have separately uploaded a supporting document on my end.

(0) 讚！ | sanshi011

I have also encountered this situation. Should the recommended reviewers be included with the supporting materials?

(0) 讚！ | Shyyyyyyy

Submit to journal 2025.09.02
Sent back to author 2025.09.03 requesting addition of reviewers, language editing, strengthening of innovative points, and reduction of Highlights word count (similar processes can be found in the comments section, which should be a regular process for journals).
Submit to journal 2025.09.04
With editor 2025.09.05
Under Review 2025.09.07

(0) 讚！ | lei zhao1111