Submitted on September 10th, the outcome is unknown.

(0) 讚！ | 萝卜搬运工

I have separately uploaded a supporting document on my end.

(0) 讚！ | sanshi011

I have also encountered this situation. Should the recommended reviewers be included with the supporting materials?

(0) 讚！ | Shyyyyyyy

Submit to journal 2025.09.02
Sent back to author 2025.09.03 requesting addition of reviewers, language editing, strengthening of innovative points, and reduction of Highlights word count (similar processes can be found in the comments section, which should be a regular process for journals).
Submit to journal 2025.09.04
With editor 2025.09.05
Under Review 2025.09.07

(0) 讚！ | lei zhao1111

请提供要翻译的内容。

(0) 讚！ | 走你

2025.05.30 submit to journal
2025.05.31 send back to author
2025.09.01 submit to journal

(0) 讚！ | 杨乾坤

31.08.2025 submit to journal
01.09.2025 with editor

(1) 讚！ | 一个灌水的辣鸡

May I ask if there are any results?

(0) 讚！ | 一个灌水的辣鸡

04.06.2025 submit to journal

Good luck!

(0) 讚！ | 艾森伯格

Submit to journal 2024.08.13
Send back to author 2024.08.14 requesting addition of reviewers, language editing, and completion within 24 hours (should be standard process for the journal)
Submit to journal 2024.08.15
Under Review 2024.08.16
Major Revision 2024.11.12
Under Review 2024.12.27
Minor Revision 2025.04.02
Under Review 2025.04.06
Minor Revision 2025.04.28
Under Review 2025.04.29
Accept 2025.5.23
During the process, there were four rounds of external review. One of the reviewers disappeared midway during the second round, causing significant delays. Additionally, one reviewer consistently took the maximum allotted time for each review (20-22 days), even though rounds 2-4 could have been completed in 3-5 days. Despite numerous reminders to the editor, urging reviewers had minimal effect. Fortunately, the editor was very efficient, returning review comments and handling revisions promptly, usually within 12 hours, ultimately leading to the successful acceptance of the manuscript!

(0) 讚！ | 我来灌灌水

Here is a timeline to share with everyone:
Submit to journal 2024.11.30
Send back to author 2024.12.1
Submit to journal 2024.12.7
With Editor 2024.10.8
Under Review 2024.10.9
Major Revision 2025.2.4
Under Review 2025.4.3
Accept 2025.4.27

(0) 讚！ | 扎布多德勒

Submitted, results unknown, waiting.

(0) 讚！ | yuanchen

Submission on 2025/02/05
Editorial feedback with 3 suggestions, including language, recommended reviewers, on 2025/02/06
Resubmission after revisions on 2025/02/08
Under Review on 2025/02/09
Major Revision on 2025/03/13
Resubmission after revisions on 2025/03/25
Under Review on 2025/03/26
Accepted on 2025/05/11

(0) 讚！ | YANZITJ

Where can I see the reviewers I have found, have they accepted the review?

(0) 讚！ | shangmin

Hello, I would like to ask if there is still a need for plagiarism check after the editing of the reworked material.

(2) 讚！ | z1111w

Hello, I would like to ask if plagiarism check is still required after rework.

(0) 讚！ | z1111w

Hello, I would like to ask if a plagiarism check is required after the product has been repaired.

(0) 讚！ | z1111w

Just two weeks.... This can't be considered running away. I always take a month.... Just wait a bit. Don't be too impatient.

(0) 讚！ | popor

Both of my second-round reviewers have gone missing, it's been over two weeks and they haven't responded. They haven't even looked at the manuscript. Can I follow up with them?

(0) 讚！ | YJZhou

The overall feeling is very slow, with a total of three reviewers, one of whom ran away after accepting the review. The editor did not handle it, so it may have been delayed for two or three months in the middle, and the manuscript was urged once.
June 27, 2024 Submitted manuscript
February 26, 2025 Accept
In the middle, it went through four rounds of review and three revisions... totaling more than 150 pages of revisions. It's exhausting, but fortunately the final result is good. The editor is a Japanese teacher, and after the first reminder, the processing was quite fast. Good things come to those who wait!

(0) 讚！ | popor

It can be included in the appendix, or it can be directly submitted for reviewer feedback.

(0) 讚！ | 田野

Excuse me, experts, after revising the paper, will the editor ask for further reduction of the word count if it exceeds twelve thousand words (twelve thousand)? The word count has already been reduced to ten thousand during the first submission. If it is really impossible to reduce further, can some content be placed in the appendix?

(0) 讚！ | YJZhou

2024/08/22 First submission
2024/08/24 Editor returns with four suggestions
2024/08/29 Resubmission
2024/08/30 With Editor
2024/09/01 Under Review
16 reviewers were contacted, averaging two per week, with the last two accepting the review
2024/11/15 Major revision
2024/12/12 Submission for revisions
2024/12/13 Under Review
The first reviewer quickly completed the review, while the second reviewer took a week to complete
2024/12/26 Major revision
2025/01/01 Submission for revisions
2025/01/02 Accepted

(1) 讚！ | Nathan745

Two reviewers, one is revising the manuscript and just returned. Originally there should have been three reviewers, but the second one disappeared and wasted three months. I suggest you follow up on the manuscript, I have reminded them two or three times.

(0) 讚！ | popor

How did your first round of external review go, my friend? How long did it take for the results to come back? I'm afraid that if I take too long, the editor and the first reviewer will give up on me.

(0) 讚！ | YJZhou