我觉得这本期刊的编辑助理在处理稿件时可能存在一定的主观性。我们团队曾经投稿一篇关于社交媒体营销的论文，结果在两个小时内被拒稿，理由是“超出期刊范围且缺乏理论贡献”。不过，我们的论文中引用了三篇相关文献，内容与期刊主题较为贴切。我感觉当时可能没有对论文进行充分的审阅，甚至可能连摘要都未详细阅读。

随后，我们将同一篇论文未经修改地投到了另一份排名更高的期刊，两周后便进入了同行评审阶段。

几个月后，我们又向该期刊提交了另一篇营销相关论文，仍然遇到了类似的问题。可能是因为论文涉及中国消费者背景（这点不太确定）。后来，我们将同一篇论文投给了另一份更好的期刊，目前正在审稿中。

根据我们的经验，编辑助理可能有一个内部筛选标准，依据主题或研究背景做出初步判断，这可能导致一些论文未能获得公正的评审机会。因此，我们认为投稿到该期刊可能效率不高，存在一定的时间成本。

(0) 讚！ | 何

Could you please tell me how fast the first review process is for the journal Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics? Thank you!

(0) 讚！ | 阿尼哈斯有

After successfully going through two rounds of major revisions, I was officially accepted. I am grateful for the efficient handling by the journal's editor-in-chief and the detailed feedback from the reviewers, who provided a total of 43 detailed suggestions that significantly improved the overall quality of the article, from logic, methodology, experiments to the discussion section.

(0) 讚！ | gp96_sjtu

[Time process] Submitted in early June, first round of minor revisions in early July, second round of minor revisions at the end of July.
[Evaluation situation] Reviewer 1 made major revisions, with 8 comments, 2 of which were not revised but explained; Reviewer 2 made minor revisions, with 3 comments, all accepted.
[Current progress] Accepted for publication.

(3) 讚！ | 陈必跃