| 期刊簡介 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
期刊名稱 | BMC MICROBIOLOGY LetPub Score 6.5
51 ratings
Rate
Reputation 7.2 Influence 5.7 Speed 8.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 期刊簡稱 | BMC MICROBIOL | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ISSN | 1471-2180 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| h-index | 94 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| 自引率 (2023-2024) | 0.00%自引率趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 掲載範囲 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| 官方網站 | http://bmcmicrobiol.biomedcentral.com | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 在線稿件提交 | https://author-welcome.nature.com/12866 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 開放訪問 | Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 出版商 | BioMed Central | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 主題領域 | 生物 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 出版國/地區 | ENGLAND | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 發行頻率 | 月刊 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 創刊年 | 2001 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 每年文章數 | 537每年文章數趨勢 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 黃金OA百分比 | 99.92% | ||||||||||||||||||||
OA Related Info![]() | APC: Yes( GBP2190; USD2890; EUR2490; ) APC waiver:Check Notes Other charges: No Keywords: microbiology Useful LinksAims & ScopeAuthor InstructionsEditorial BoardAnonymous peer review | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Web of Science 四分位 ( 2023-2024) | WOS Quartile: Q2
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| 索引 (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 鏈接到PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1471-2180%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 平均審稿時間 * | 來自出版商的數據: 來自作者的數據: About 3.0 month(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 競爭力 * | 來自作者的數據: Moderate | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 參考鏈接 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| *所有的審稿過程指標,如接受率和審稿速度,僅限於用戶提交的稿件。因此,這些指標可能無法準確反映期刊的競爭力或速度。 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| |
| 首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
| [BMC MICROBIOLOGY] 的評論 | 撰寫評論 |
| 作者: 官允醒 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-05-14 09:58:26 評論於 How many reviewers are generally involved in the review process? |
| 作者: 江左梅郎 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-05-05 12:11:24 評論於 Many editors of this magazine are extremely irresponsible. I have encountered a similar situation, and I directly requested to withdraw the submission. It has been seven months, and the first review has not been completed. The system shows that the editor received one review opinion, but did not receive the opinion of another reviewer. The editor has been neglecting the manuscript and has not re-invited reviewers, leaving it untouched for several months. However, the magazine requires reviewers to complete their reviews within two weeks. I have sent four or five emails, one each month, and each time I receive an official response apologizing for the delay and promising to handle it as soon as possible. It seems like they are just dragging it out. Two more months have passed with no progress. Later, the corresponding author sent an email inquiring about the status, and the response was identical to the one received several months ago, a direct copy and paste. This may be their usual practice. Another possibility is that the editor's own research interests are very close to yours, and you know... |
| 作者: shuer 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-04-16 17:32:18 評論於 Didn't you send an email to follow up? It's been in the editing hands for months and it's really difficult. |
| 作者: Gu 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-04-09 22:41:14 評論於 Excuse me, has there been any movement or updates on your end? |
| 作者: signalmolecule 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2026-04-03 14:46:34 評論於 Friends, how do we break this situation? 4 May 2025, Submission received 14 May 2025, Revision received 14 May 2025, Submission passed technical check 26 May 2025, First reviewer(s) invited 2 Jun 2025, Reviewer(s) accepted 17 Jul 2025, Reviewer report(s) received 22 Aug 2025, Revision requested 2 Sep 2025, Revision received 9 Sep 2025, First reviewer(s) invited 9 Sep 2025, Reviewer(s) accepted 9 Sep 2025, Reviewer report(s) received 3 Apr 2026, and then there has been no progress or updates. Sigh, feeling tired. |
| 作者: 闻笛赋 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2026-03-03 11:33:40 評論於 Same question, it has been over a month and still no news. |
| 作者: karaeco 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2026-01-30 00:28:13 評論於 Submission received on 05 Nov 2025 First reviewer(s) invited on 16 Nov 2025 (20+→2) Reviewer report(s) received on 17 Dec 2025 Revision requested on 19 Dec 2025 Revision received on 14 Jan 2026 Revision requested on 20 Jan 2026 Revision received on 28 Jan 2026 Accepted on 29 Jan 2026 This is my first time submitting to this journal, and I was pleasantly surprised by the speed of the process. I had heard that this journal was very slow, and was even considering withdrawing my submission. However, it ended up being faster than other journals I have submitted to. I submitted at the end of the year and it was accepted in less than 3 months. The editors and reviewers were very efficient, often processing things the next day. They were also very prompt in answering any questions I had. I am very impressed! Wishing the journal continued success! |
| 作者: 秋刀鱼 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-12-16 14:29:41 評論於 Just wait patiently if there is no reply, it took me 7-8 months from submission to acceptance. |
| 作者: karaeco 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-11-19 21:16:48 評論於 I also submitted 10 experts, how many people will review the manuscript? |
| 作者: signalmolecule 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-11-17 15:12:02 評論於 What is the status of the follow-up progress? I seem to have encountered a similar situation, it has been 2-3 months since I submitted the repair request, but there has been no response, and my emails have not been answered. |
| 作者: 笔业真难 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-11-04 21:12:14 評論於 When you sent an email asking, what is the email address of the editor-in-chief? Could you please provide it? |
| 作者: 笔业真难 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-11-04 21:09:47 評論於 Could you provide the email address of the editor-in-chief who is urging me to submit the manuscript? |
| 作者: 古风 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 4.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-09-01 11:12:05 評論於 How long does it take for you to be able to search in PubMed after you have paid the fee? |
| 作者: 古风 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 4.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-08-06 09:21:09 評論於 The editor-in-chief is very patient. A few days after submitting the manuscript, he requested additional materials and then sent it for review. The review process was terrifying, with 10 experts selected, but in the end only three experts reviewed the manuscript. The chosen reviewers were very professional. Three experts provided major revisions, while two provided minor revisions. After a second round of minor revisions, the manuscript was accepted. The first round of revisions was sent back for review three months later, and the whole process took a total of four months. |
| 作者: 恋 領域: 农林科学 審稿時間: 12.0 month(s) 結果: 拒稿 撰寫評論 |
2025-06-13 12:09:41 評論於 The review speed is the slowest I have ever seen. It's already December and I still haven't received all the reviewers' comments. I have reminded them three times but they keep asking me to wait. From last year to this year, are they intentionally delaying the manuscript? |
| 作者: amanea 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 3.0 month(s) 結果: 修改後接受 撰寫評論 |
2025-05-06 21:50:10 評論於 Submitted on January 12th and accepted on April 20th, the efficiency throughout the process was quite high. Feedback for revisions will typically be received within two weeks. |
| 作者: 好帅天下第一 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-04-01 09:11:20 評論於 Received an article from a Korean author, the journal requires review comments to be submitted within 21 days. |
| 作者: leokinmann@gmail.com 領域: 生命科学 審稿時間: 12.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2025-01-31 20:28:54 評論於 BMC Microbiology exhibited severe editorial delays: reviewers submitted feedback, but the manuscript stagnated for 4 months post-review. Assistant editors lacked authority to intervene; handling editors ignored inquiries. Such inefficiency disrespects authors’ time and undermines scholarly productivity. Researchers should avoid this journal until editorial accountability improves. |
| 作者: 秋刀鱼 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-12-15 10:15:21 評論於 It has been nearly 2 months since the first round of revisions were submitted. The reviewer has not responded to the revisions and has not replied to emails from the editor. What should we do? |
| 作者: everybodysicks 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-06-06 16:17:33 評論於 Sent an email on April 21st, and only received a response on May 17th saying that they couldn't find enough reviewers |
| 作者: 东方一直秀 領域: 医学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-05-15 11:45:06 評論於 It's been a month since I applied, but I'm still in technical review. I've been emailing them for over a week and still haven't received a response. I don't know what's going on |
| 作者: xiaoyu# 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-05-11 21:40:47 評論於 It has been a month and a half since the investment was made on April 1st, but there has been no movement yet |
| 作者: Athena Locke 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-01-08 12:33:41 評論於 It seems that we really have to upload it, otherwise it won't pass the technical review |
| 作者: Wanda Toynbee 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2024-01-03 14:18:41 評論於 Hello, just wondering if I will receive a response if I send an email to urge the editor? I haven't received a response yet |
| 作者: 水月绿云 領域: 生物学 審稿時間: 0.0 month(s) 結果: 待定&不明 撰寫評論 |
2023-12-20 19:58:40 評論於 How long does the technical review usually take? |
| 首頁 上一頁 1 2 3 4 下一頁 末頁 (頁 | |
Contact us