2024.03.25, submission received; 2024.06.21, Editor assigned; 2024.06.26--10.14, Peer review (1); 2024.10.28, Amendment received; 2025.03.16--, Peer review (2)

(0) 讚！ | Hypo1970

Proof was sent on March 12th, and a follow-up email was sent in between to remind.

(0) 讚！ | Toky

February 27, 2025, send email for receiving.

(0) 讚！ | Toky

My article stops at
First reviewer(s) invited 26 Sep 2024
No response for over four months.

Has anyone sent a letter to the editor and gotten a reply?

I sent letters on 1/3 and 1/15, but I didn’t receive a reply both times.

Can anyone who has successfully sent a letter share the editor's email address?
I'm worried that my letter wasn't sent correctly

(0) 讚！ | QQ

Sorry, there has been an accident.

(0) 讚！ | 一个想毕业的人

Too slow, from March 8 to December 31, speechless.

(0) 讚！ | Toky

Submission history
Submission received
Submission status Date
Submission received
08 Mar 2024
Technical check
Submission status Date
Submission is under technical check
08 Mar 2024
Ready for editorial assignment
08 Mar 2024
Peer review
Submission status Date
First reviewer(s) invited
13 Jun 2024
Reviewer(s) accepted
27 Jun 2024
Reviewer report(s) received
30 Nov 2024
Revision requested
30 Dec 2024

(2) 讚！ | Toky

What happened later?

(0) 讚！ | 西域青夏

Have both reviewers agreed?

(0) 讚！ | accept1111

May I ask if both reviewers have agreed? Or is it sufficient for just one to agree?

(0) 讚！ | accept1111

Submission received on 23 Jun 2024
Revision requested on 07 Oct 2024
Revision requested on 29 Oct 2024
Potentially acceptable on 22 Nov 2024
It took a full 5 months, the speed was indeed a bit slow, but the result was acceptable!

(0) 讚！ | 夜阳

Excuse me, is there any revision?

(0) 讚！ | 削月又之

Review speed: 12.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0
Research focus: Psychology
Experience sharing: Slow

(0) 讚！ | Iris Spenser

What is your email address?

(0) 讚！ | 南川半莲

Two withdrawals, over 10 months of review, and finally rejected for not fitting the scope of the journal. It's really ridiculous.

(0) 讚！ | xu0727

It's been over three months since the review comments came back, but the editor still hasn't returned any feedback. Worried.

(0) 讚！ | 凌波寄瑶

Submission history: The submission was received on 05 Feb 2024; First reviewer(s) were invited on 16 Apr 2024; Revision was requested on 20 Sep 2024; Submission was accepted on 23 Sep 2024.

Overall, before submitting to this journal, the article had been submitted to two other reputable journals and had undergone peer review. The article had been improved based on the feedback received during the revision process. The peer review process for this journal, from minor revisions to acceptance, was relatively smooth. The reviewers' comments were professional and helpful compared to the feedback received from the previous two journals. Grateful for the experience.

(1) 讚！ | gonewithwind

This journal has been in operation for 8 months.

(0) 讚！ | xu0727

Submission received on February 2, 2024
Submission is under technical check on February 2, 2024
Submission passed technical check on February 14, 2024
Ready for editorial assignment on February 14, 2024
Editor assigned on May 22, 2024
Submission under peer review on June 3, 2024
Can you please expedite the process? A reminder has been sent!

(0) 讚！ | 一个想毕业的人

How long has the formatting review been going on for?

(0) 讚！ | 六脉修然

Excuse me, where are we at now?

(0) 讚！ | 六脉修然

Format review has been 7 days fast

(0) 讚！ | 六脉修然

Submitted to Journal	2023.11.19
Technical check in progress	2023.11.19
Editors invited	2023.11.20
Editor appointed	2024.02.06
5 Reviewer(s) invited	2024.02.08
11 Reviewer(s) invited	2024.02.28
Revision	2024.03.20
Revision technical check in progress	2024.04.08
Amendment received	2024.04.09
Submission under peer review	
Submission accepted	2024.05.14

Overall efficiency is high, and the reviewers' comments are very nice. The suggestions are very pertinent and to the point. Hoping to encounter such excellent reviewers in the future~

(1) 讚！ | jayLin

Thank you for the sisters' answers. I am two reviewers, one suggests good revisions, and the other refuses to revise. The editor's revisions have been made. Now, one reviewer received feedback the same day, but the other has not made any progress in the past half month

(0) 讚！ | 123Dylan123

Three reviewers, one major revision, and two acceptances. The person in charge of the major revision reviewed it very carefully and carefully examined each reference. Nearly 30 questions were raised in one breath, some of which were not good

(0) 讚！ | lanlianhua