In addition to the five reviewers in the first review, there were also editors who provided more than 50 comments. We replied with an 80-page response letter. It was exhausting to make so many changes, but the process was indeed quick. Best wishes for CP to continue improving.

(0) 讚！ | dark_阳光

You review very quickly.

(0) 讚！ | 接好心审稿人

4.22我们
4.23确认

(0) 讚！ | dark_阳光

Five experts were invited again, and four of them accepted the review. So now we have five reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | jj01502

4.15 小幅修订
4.15 stj

(0) 讚！ | dark_阳光

4.14 The status has not changed yet...

(0) 讚！ | jj01502

15 days

(0) 讚！ | dark_阳光

4.1 R1 upload
4.3 we
4.3 UR
4.3 2-4-4 rrc
4.4 3-4-4
4.10 4-4-4 rrc

(0) 讚！ | dark_阳光

I just started inviting 11 reviewers and only one of them accepted the review. Will I invite more later? It feels like this will be very slow.

(0) 讚！ | 接好心审稿人

Is it hopeful to have 11 reviewers for one paper to be accepted?

(0) 讚！ | 接好心审稿人

2.28 with editor
3.13 review (showing sent to 5 people, 1 person accepted)
3.23 1 person reviewed the manuscript, status changed to Required Reviews Completed
4.7 Still in this status today, still 1 person accepted and completed the review
This submission is a bit slow.

(0) 讚！ | jj01502

Is the time given to reviewers by this journal three weeks?

(0) 讚！ | accept*

Kids, you still need to invest in carbohydrates, the forever eldest brother, the neighbor IJBM has already become a roadside dog T-T.

(0) 讚！ | zzrfreeloop

2024.11.07 submitted
2024.11.09 under review
2024.11.30 major revision  Reviewed by 4 reviewers, 1 recommended rejection and requested additional experiments, while the other 3 had more positive feedback. Editor requested major revisions.
2025.01.05 Revision submitted  Resubmitted after conducting additional experiments as per reviewers' suggestions.
2025.01.12 accept  All reviewers unanimously agreed to accept, including the one who previously recommended rejection.

(0) 讚！ | Yuyuyu

This depends on the editor. Some editors are very particular and insist on the word "assumption". It is best to have the introduction as a separate paragraph. Based on the above information, we assume that the addition of vitamin B affects the synthesis and preparation of hyaluronic acid. Such a statement would suffice.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名投稿

A scientific hypothesis is a reasonable guess proposed by the author based on previous research results and their own thoughts, which can be experimentally verified. In terms of writing the introduction, it is just another form of expression of the shortcomings of previous research. For example, previous studies systematically researched the effects of individual components on heavy metal adsorption, but ignored the coexisting components. According to conventional writing, this meaning is translated. However, changing it to "Due to the complicated interactions between multiple constituents, Cd(II) sorption behaviors onto functionalized materials within the reaction systems containing mixed IC, OC, and HM are expected to differ from those in single components' presence (scientific hypothesis 2)" is also a scientific hypothesis. In the last paragraph of the introduction, it is written "To validate the above hypothesis, we need to do....", and this is followed up in the results, discussion, and conclusion sections.

(0) 讚！ | Andymin

Hello, could you please advise how to write hypotheses? The journal has requested supplementary hypothetical statements.

(0) 讚！ | Lucklyluckly

It took 3 months and 4 reviewers before finally being accepted.

(0) 讚！ | 匿名而已

Do all authors need to confirm the submission of this journal?

(0) 讚！ | 111旮旯

1.24we, still not submitted for review, what's going on?

(0) 讚！ | 是娟娟啊

The review process for the submission has been going smoothly. It has been with the editor for five days now, and we are expecting feedback by the second day. We will not be checking it until then, but we will keep you updated on the progress.

(0) 讚！ | Oangmo

Generally, reviewers take about 14 days, so please be patient.

(0) 讚！ | pp2002

Accepted in just over two months, both the editor and reviewers were very quick.

(0) 讚！ | pp2002

Boss, this retreat is asking for the introduction to be written in hypothetical statements, what does that mean? How did you write yours, can you give me some guidance?

(0) 讚！ | 匿名而已

The experiment supplement was completed and revised on December 12th. It was reviewed by RRC on December 23rd and received some minor details editing on December 24th. It was returned on December 26th, with the editor on December 27th, and accepted on December 27th. Thank you for the high efficiency of the journal!

(0) 讚！ | 游123