More than two papers were accepted for review, and more reviews are still to come.

(0) 讚！ | kefeng

If more than two reviewers accept the invitation, the review will continue.

(0) 讚！ | kefeng

2025-07-29 (12:38PM) With Editor

(0) 讚！ | 有梦想谁都了不起之LG

At least one reviewer is required to accept.

(0) 讚！ | hyc

2025-07-28 Revision Submitted to Journal (17 comments, with a 20-page response letter)

(0) 讚！ | 有梦想谁都了不起之LG

April 30th 3.47 AM Submission
April 30th 11.57 AM with editor
May 3rd 3.04 PM with editor
May 10th Two reviewers accepted RRC
May 20th Two major revisions editor major revisions
June 13th Return for revisions
June 17th Editor handling reviewers accepted, accepted

(0) 讚！ | solorway

I am also like this now, may I ask how your manuscript is doing? Will it be accepted directly after major revisions?

(0) 讚！ | biener

7.12 RRC
7.13 Major
Fast speed~

(0) 讚！ | little_foo

2025-07-01 Major Revisions for reconsideration (Reviewed by 3 individuals, 2 minor revisions and 1 major revision)

(0) 讚！ | 有梦想谁都了不起之LG

2025-7-1 Major Revisions for reconsideration (2 minor revisions, 1 major revision)

(0) 讚！ | 有梦想谁都了不起之LG

After 2 years, I submitted to CP again.
2025.6.24 Submitted (ID4500+)
2025.6.30 Under Review (10+, accepted 2)

(0) 讚！ | little_foo

Submission to STJ on February 14, 2025.
Returned for format modification and revision of assumptions regarding the performance of polysaccharides on February 18, 2025.
UR on March 14, previously WE, sent a reminder letter.
RRC on April 14, 2025.
Major Revision on April 17, 2025 (sent a reminder letter, with 5 reviewers asking 60 questions, requiring additional experiments, 3 major revisions, and 2 rejections. Extension requested for 2 weeks, with a return time of 1 month).
Returned to STJ on May 31, 2025.
UR on June 2, 2025.
RRC on June 20 (reminder letter, sent to four reviewers for second review, two accepted).
Minor Revision on June 22 (both reviewers accepted, including the one who had previously rejected).
Minor Revision returned to WE on June 24.
Acceptance on June 27 (reminder letter).
The submission process required four reminders, each time advancing to the next stage immediately. The process lasted for 4 and a half months. Best wishes to everyone for a successful outcome!

(0) 讚！ | 宇燮

In recent years, peer review has become increasingly challenging, with each submission being reviewed by five or more reviewers, resulting in a plethora of recommendations.

(0) 讚！ | duihiauhfui

2025-06-26 UR (2 people completed; invited 4 people, 3 people accepted for review)

(0) 讚！ | 有梦想谁都了不起之LG

Just want to ask how many reviewers are required for the CP? Two reviewers have reviewed and recommended revisions, but it was ultimately rejected.

(0) 讚！ | hzxdb

2025-06-19 UR (1 person completed; invited 4 people, 3 accepted for review)

(0) 讚！ | 有梦想谁都了不起之LG

Sent Back to Author Format Error Returned

(0) 讚！ | liqqwer--

Please translate the following paragraph into English: 6-17 SJ

(0) 讚！ | liqqwer--

2025-06-16 With Editor
2025-06-16 Under review

(0) 讚！ | 有梦想谁都了不起之LG

2025-06-16 With Editor

(0) 讚！ | 有梦想谁都了不起之LG

#First time submitting to CP, documenting the submission process
2025-06-12 Submitted
2025-06-14 Return to author (Editorial request for revisions: provide scientific hypothesis in introduction; provide polysaccharide structure information; place images in corresponding sections of the main text)
2025-06-16 Re-submitted

(0) 讚！ | 有梦想谁都了不起之LG

Which editor did you choose?

(0) 讚！ | 钢枪阿文

What happened later? Did you receive it?

(0) 讚！ | hhh---

How long will the status of "with editor" last? The status has not changed since the 6.9 update.

(0) 讚！ | hhh---

June 12th Submitted to Journal

(0) 讚！ | 有梦想谁都了不起之LG