7.22 submit
7.27 received technical feedback, supplementing polysaccharide characterization and hypothesis
7.28 return after modification

(0) 讚！ | 小玉米

July 26, 2026 UR

(0) 讚！ | 大大大大大鲨鱼

2026.04.30 submit
2026.05.08 UR
2026.06.04 RRC
2026.06.07 major
2026.06.14 resubmit
2026.06.16 UR
2026.06.18 major
2026.06.20 resubmit
2026.06.30 UR
2026.07.10 major
2026.07.15 resubmit
2026.07.17 UR
2026.07.21 minor
2026.07.24 resubmit
2026.07.25 accept

(0) 讚！ | kathy_93

Submitted on July 15, 2026
Technical requirements returned to the author on July 22, 2026: Add more polysaccharide information, clearly explain technical assumptions, and include chemical supplies information, etc.
Technical requirements for revision on July 23, 2026
With Editor on July 24, 2026

(0) 讚！ | 大大大大大鲨鱼

Add polysaccharide information on Jul 14, 2026.

(0) 讚！ | 有何不可678

Jul 8, 2026 STJ
Jul 9, 2026 STA format modified

(0) 讚！ | 有何不可678

I would like to ask whether the opportunity to resubmit was given by the editor, or if the article was directly rejected and resubmitted by the author themselves. Please clarify.

(0) 讚！ | 王木木～

You can submit it for review soon, it has been half a month for us as well.

(0) 讚！ | 呀虎呀呼黑

It has been 15 days and we still haven't found a place to send the email for review.

(0) 讚！ | 呀虎呀呼黑

You are amazing, bro.

(0) 讚！ | SBM

CP is still fast! The impact factor is still rising.
2026.5.4 Submission
The associate editor requested additional information twice
2026.5.17 UR
2026.5.31 Major
2026.6.8 Submission
2026.6.20 Accept

(0) 讚！ | Chaim

Enjoy good luck, seek approval and acceptance.

(0) 讚！ | 追光而行

Major Revisions for reconsideration.

(0) 讚！ | SBM

5.18 Under Review, currently inviting 6, accepting 2. Hope everything goes smoothly!

(0) 讚！ | SDU-GYJ

May 15th, it's been 14 days and still WE.

(0) 讚！ | SDU-GYJ

Required reviews completed. The app still has one pending feedback, so we may need to wait for the final reviewer. Hoping for a positive outcome.

(0) 讚！ | SBM

2026.04.26 Submitted
2026.04.28 Returned to author for additional hypothesis information (PS: I wrote the hypothesis, he didn't see it. My response is on which line)
2026.04.29 Resubmitted
2026.05.01 Returned to author to place images in appropriate position in the text, then made changes and resubmitted
2026.05.02 with editor
It's been 9 days and still in WE.

(0) 讚！ | SDU-GYJ

The second CP is much faster.

February 13, 2026: First submission, directly rejected. On February 20, the editor gave me some suggestions to supplement the experiment.

March 9, 2026: Resubmitted.

April 24, 2026: First external review came back, with three reviewers - two minor revisions and one acceptance. A total of 12 questions, no requirement to supplement the experiment.

April 29, 2026: Revision.

May 8, 2026: Acceptance.

The efficiency of carbons is indeed getting higher and higher. This time it took just 2 months from resubmission to acceptance. I can finally graduate with a Ph.D. Hopefully, everything goes smoothly in the future.

(0) 讚！ | 一键走天下

Please translate the following paragraph into English:---

(0) 讚！ | YUN126126

4.23 UR

(0) 讚！ | SBM

4.20 With Editor

(0) 讚！ | SBM

Return twice, modify the format.

(0) 讚！ | SBM

4.15 Submitted to Journal

(1) 讚！ | SBM

I am also this Gloria, two minor revisions and one major revision, finally found a bunch of irrelevant issues in the materials and methods, and said that I did not use their journal format for references, and finally rejected it. This person is really rubbish.

(0) 讚！ | nicedayXXXX

Hello, I wanted to ask if I need to respond to the additions or modifications in the cover letter when requesting revisions. This is my second time revising, the first time I made some requests for information to be added and highlighted in the cover letter. This time, I did not request a response in the cover letter. Also, do I need to include shoe size? Can the previous highlights and responses be removed or deleted?

(0) 讚！ | 科研狗卒一生