Could you please clarify the situation regarding the system being stuck in EA after the rework? Shouldn't it have been handed back to the previous editor?

(0) 讚！ | 艾森伯格

It's been 3 months now and it's still EA.

(0) 讚！ | Jingoist

20250612, record EA for over 3 months.

(0) 讚！ | Jingoist

Please translate the following paragraph into English: "Sure"

(0) 讚！ | 艾森伯格

The date was updated to 6/6, but the status remains the same: Completed 2, Accepted 3, Sent 10. There have been no changes. Could it be that one of the reviewers has not yet submitted their comments?

(0) 讚！ | 艾森伯格

Two reviewers accepted the review for revision. The first reviewer completed the review in just 5 hours. The other reviewer also accepted and hopefully, we will have good luck.

(0) 讚！ | Ethan Wang

Invited 12 people, reviewed for a month and a half, now sent back for revisions and already UR.

(0) 讚！ | Ethan Wang

I submitted my paper at the same time as you. The second reviewer is still reviewing it now. How many reviewers did you invite, bro? How long does each reviewer take to review?

(0) 讚！ | 问啊问的

2.22 submitted, 2.24 EA, 3.15 EA, 3.19 UR, 5.5 major revision, deadline 5.25, returned for revision on 5.21, hoping for good luck.

(0) 讚！ | Ethan Wang

Is it normal for UR to become Dip in the future? Why does the public account show that there are still experts who have not completed the review, but the system has already displayed Dip?

(0) 讚！ | 艾森伯格

The CATENA journal, two reviewers, one approved, after the second review only one reviewer's 6 opinions remain. After the revisions, the reviewer refused to review, and so far the editor has re-invited 7 reviewers, I wonder what the result will be...

(0) 讚！ | shihao250

Submitted on April 4th, with no hope of acceptance, but it was still sent for review. Now patiently waiting for the rejection... On April 30th, a second invitation was sent to reviewers, but so far no one has accepted to review!

(0) 讚！ | 渫水布衣

Can I ask everyone, if a paper is rejected by one reviewer without any additional comments from the editor, can it be resubmitted to CATENA? (The reviewer's comments did not criticize the research methods, but mainly focused on the clarity of the paper and its logic)

(0) 讚！ | Z1Hui

Please follow the official account of Elsevier on WeChat, where you can receive real-time updates on the status of your papers. @Ethan Wang

(0) 讚！ | Asir-123

On May 6, 2025, it will be two months exactly since EA.

(0) 讚！ | Jingoist

Is there a result now?

(0) 讚！ | Xinyuan0408

There is a plugin that can be used to view, or it can be found on the public account.

(0) 讚！ | Ethan Wang

May I ask how the original poster knows the information about the number of editors inviting reviewers?

(0) 讚！ | Shaobo Yang

Please invite at least three reviewers. I didn't pay attention to how many reviewers were invited. In any case, we received three or four opinions back.

(0) 讚！ | fengfeng1992

I'm ashamed to say that I haven't received feedback on either of the two articles yet, but it seems like I will need to submit them to three people.

(0) 讚！ | 艾森伯格

May I ask how many reviewers were invited in total? Why did only one out of the 20 reviewers I invited accept the review invitation?

(0) 讚！ | 问啊问的

April 25th:
Review completed: 0
Accepted review invitations: 2→3
Sent out review invitations*: 8

(0) 讚！ | 艾森伯格

Please record, April 25th
Review completed: 2
Accept review invitation: 3
Send review invitation*: 10

(0) 讚！ | 艾森伯格

Hello, may I ask if Catena currently requires three reviewers?

(0) 讚！ | 艾森伯格

The first submission of the article was given major revisions after a three-month review period, with one rejection. However, the editor felt that the revised version still had merit. Subsequent minor revisions were made and the revised article was resubmitted for review, with acceptance received within half a month. The process was relatively fast. Let's all continue to work hard.

(0) 讚！ | fengfeng1992