Oh, makes sense. It's already 4-2-1 now, with a 2-day difference in the acceptance of the manuscripts by the two reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | 幻在梦中探险

Too slow, this editor is too slow, not professional, makes mistakes, and is difficult to reach.

(0) 讚！ | fjfshu

3.26 Submitted
5.21 Under review
6.27 Major revision
6.30 Revised
7.20 Review complete
7.23 RRC
7.23 Upload another review article proposal due to editing error
Feedback on issues to journal editorial assistant and editor
So far, unable to contact the French female professor editor

(0) 讚！ | fjfshu

How are you brothers and sisters, have you finished the external audit?

(0) 讚！ | 给早起的人一杯卡布奇诺

The deadline for reviewing is 21 days, not 15 days, but it is normal to be a few days late.

(0) 讚！ | 不能熬夜的科研dog

I have been waiting for 23 days now and there is still someone who hasn't finished reviewing my work. I heard that the deadline for reviewing is 15 working days. Are they trying to avoid it?

(0) 讚！ | lz321

I checked the review cycle of my teacher's CEJ, which is around three weeks this year.

(0) 讚！ | CCOLL

Please submit the manuscript on 7.16, we have changed the dates to 7.19 and 7.22, hoping to send it for review.

(0) 讚！ | zhangbo316

My experience of submitting twice is that if the date changes with the editor, it is highly likely that it is being sent for review.

(0) 讚！ | 不能熬夜的科研dog

7.28 is still 4-2-0. Now the Elsevier tracker is also not working. The longest reviewer from last submission took only 16 days, and now it has been 16 days. Hopefully, this time will bring a good result!

(0) 讚！ | 幻在梦中探险

7.27 (3, completed 2), the editor is currently not looking for new reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | CCOLL

But it feels like this journal is really not that easy.

(0) 讚！ | CCOLL

I submitted to CEJ for the third time. The first two times were not successful, and the papers were not sent for review (one was finally accepted by JMCA, and the other was accepted by Nano Letters after adding many experiments). This time, I am trying again in a new field. I submitted on 7.19, received a desk rejection on 7.23, and the status changed once on 7.25 but it is still in the waiting for editor decision stage. There have been no further changes, so I hope for better luck this time.

(1) 讚！ | greedyboy

Good luck, keep receiving it.

(0) 讚！ | 勤奋的狗蛋

We are applying for review, feeling that this stage is very long and nervous, please please please review.

(0) 讚！ | 给早起的人一杯卡布奇诺

The submission was made on March 26th, and today marks exactly 4 months. The revision comments were submitted on June 30th, the review was completed on July 20th, and the editor mistakenly provided incorrect comments on July 23rd, asking us to change it to a review article. We originally submitted a research paper. Feedback was given to the assistant, the editor, and the system email, but we have still not seen the final specific results.

(0) 讚！ | fjfshu

Some editors are so slow to the extreme, they make mistakes and mix things up, and they still haven't corrected them until now.

(1) 讚！ | fjfshu

Resubmit with revisions, then accept.

(0) 讚！ | D.Sean

Return for repair.

(0) 讚！ | felixone

Will our large CEJ be divided into two districts next year? Please, please don't do that.

(0) 讚！ | 科研小小废柴

Please translate the following passage into English: ♥

(0) 讚！ | kmxj2020

Bask in good luck and embrace good fortune.

(0) 讚！ | 大熊1996

Resubmit, hoping for an Accept this time!

(0) 讚！ | 幻在梦中探险

My personal third CEJ, this time the speed is really fast.
5.14 Submit
6.18 Major revise
7.7 Resubmit
7.8 With editor
7.9 Under review
7.12 RRC
7.20 Accept

(0) 讚！ | DrewSeeley

With such a high volume of submissions, I am afraid of becoming the next ST. However, the quality of CEJ is still good. It is a well-established top journal, and I am also prepared to submit. Good luck!

(0) 讚！ | MX666