I haven't seen it. Someone should have reviewed it by now.

(0) 讚！ | 维尼修猴

Help friends, how can it go from 2 to 0, I have been waiting for so long and this is the first time I have seen it
2026.09.21 With editor
2026.09.23 Under Review (6/3/0)
2026.09.24 Under Review (6/4/0)
2026.09.30 Under Review (6/4/1)
2026.10.07 Under Review (6/4/2)
2026.10.08 Under Review (6/4/0)

(0) 讚！ | fading

Submitted on June 12, 2026.
Reviewed on June 24, submitted 24, 8 accepted for review.
Major revisions requested on July 6, with 50 comments from 6 reviewers, editor gave one month for revisions.
Received revised comments on August 6, with 3 reviewers agreeing.
Direct acceptance by editor on August 25.

(0) 讚！ | 0yyy0

No, it's been over two months and there has been no news at all...

(0) 讚！ | yinshi12

Have you submitted it for review?

(0) 讚！ | 5JJ

What about now? Has it been reviewed? I submitted in July too, it's been two months and still no response...

(0) 讚！ | 顺利毕业hhh

The submission was made at the end of March 2026 and quickly sent for review. Feedback was received in early June, categorized and detailed by two reviewers who were very meticulous. Each constructive suggestion posed a challenge and improvement to the quality of the article. By responding to the feedback, the overall logic was clarified and the value direction of the work was reaffirmed. Rushing to submit feedback around June 16th, and then returning for a second review at the end of June, there were still a few sharp logical ideas that were not clearly explained, as well as some minor grammatical and expression issues. After going through the summer break, the third review took a bit longer, and by the end of August, the results were positive.

(0) 讚！ | 勤火燎原

Is it normal to still be with the editor from July 19th to September 17th?

(0) 讚！ | 工催麻瓜佳美

I have been 12 days.

(0) 讚！ | 中国好青年

It has been ten days since RRC.

(0) 讚！ | lm1027

I have been 12 days.

(0) 讚！ | 中国好青年

Last year, after being under review, three reviewers provided feedback: two suggested major revisions and one rejected the manuscript. After being rejected by the editor, the manuscript was put on hold for a year before being resubmitted and successfully accepted by CES. This was the first publication for the senior researcher. The two reviewers raised some concerns about experimental and model details, but thanks to the diligent work of the author in organizing and categorizing important data in advance, the revisions went smoothly. The next day, both reviewers agreed to accept the revised manuscript. Special thanks to Editor Chen Dong for his efficient and fast handling of the submission process, typically providing responses within 1-2 days.

(0) 讚！ | 李青鸽

How long does the first-instance RRC status typically last?

(0) 讚！ | lm1027

This editor is just like *, what's the point of submitting articles now? Just dragging things out, really grinding away at people's enthusiasm, it's disgusting unpaid labor.

(1) 讚！ | pingpang

0731 submitted to journal
0802 with editor
0803 with editor update date
No change till now. Is there anything slower?

(0) 讚！ | Miriatowa

8.13 Submitted
8.14 With editor
8.22 With editor
8.27 Reject

(0) 讚！ | zmdcjn