The second review opinion was returned on March 30, and the status changed from RRC to DIP. On April 1, the system status automatically changed to WE, and it has been WE ever since. Does anyone know what this situation is? How long does WE typically last before results are obtained? Has anyone experienced this situation before?

(0) 讚！ | JF

CCL, in terms of article quality, is very good and stable, ranking at the top in the domestic one district. However, it inexplicably rejected my submission, with only three reviewers and not many issues. It was only the editorial decision not to consider publication, and whoever handled the editing did not leave a name. It's too shady, I think it's just a journal within a circle.

(0) 讚！ | Miao Chio

3.26 submission

(0) 讚！ | huangchy

Why is there no submission number in the email received after submitting the manuscript? What is going on?

(0) 讚！ | huangchy

Hello, may I ask if you have received a reference number for your submission, or if it has been rejected directly? I haven't received a reference number and I am feeling dizzy.

(0) 讚！ | huangchy

I applied in September last year and have not received any notification email yet. Is the editor still processing the application?

(0) 讚！ | zycyy

Excuse me, should the link be sent to the first author or the corresponding author?

(0) 讚！ | zycyy

20260119 Submission
20260120 With Editor
20260123 Under Review

(0) 讚！ | mabeng

Rejected without leaving a name.

(0) 讚！ | CCOLL

Submitted on 1.18 to STJ (still no change today, they didn't even give me a number, hahahaha)
If trying doesn't work, I'll look for another district.

(0) 讚！ | CCOLL

I have been waiting for several days, why haven't I received any initial review message or is it still "with editor"? I submitted on January 9th and it is still "with editor" on the 15th.

(0) 讚！ | 收收收zzzz

In the same situation, the manuscript remained in the DIP status for two weeks, and then three reviewers did not reject it, but instead requested additional references. The editor rejected it.

(0) 讚！ | xiaomeng

When facing reviewers who clearly requested minor revisions, one paper was accepted after revision while the other did not receive specific feedback, but the comments were generally positive. However, the latter was directly rejected by the editor, leaving people puzzled.

(0) 讚！ | 爱上科研的小王

The review process may be fast, but the rejection is also very inexplicable. It seems that there are quite a few rejections after submission.

(0) 讚！ | Miao Chio

Over here, the reviewers are all minor revisions and the editor rejected it.

(0) 讚！ | 该

After being rejected four times by the trash journal, would you still want to submit to the sub-journal with such high standards? It is not recommended.

(0) 讚！ | stones

The process was fast, but all four times were rejected and resubmitted, the feedback given was good but still rejected and resubmitted, wasting time.

(0) 讚！ | stones

I thought I was just an example, but I didn't expect so many reviewers to make corrections, the editor rejected it directly without leaving a name.

(0) 讚！ | 如风随水

It's just a trash journal, all four reviewers made revisions, and the editor just said thank you for submitting the paper, but we cannot consider publishing your paper and rejected it without saying why. If you don't want it, why bother sending it for review, wasting the time of authors and reviewers. The rejection letter didn't even dare to write the editor's name.

(0) 讚！ | 如风随水

The speed is fast, but very dark. All four reviewers provided revisions, and the editor rejected it. After reading the above article, many are not as good as mine. I don't know what the editor wants. It's okay, don't submit it.

(0) 讚！ | 如风随水

Same question, I didn't find the option for research article.

(0) 讚！ | kkbang666

Update, several formatting modification suggestions were received on October 10th, and were addressed promptly on the same day. Another round of revisions was conducted with the editor.

(0) 讚！ | alohadong

Why?

(0) 讚！ | 芋泥麻薯

August 5th has been online, September 8th for the proofreading, September 10th the public account has been promoted, and there is still no issue... How much longer do we have to wait, it's delaying things.

(0) 讚！ | 科研小白2024

It's best to avoid this journal.

(0) 讚！ | 77为77