2025.05.20 Submission
2025.05.20 Awaiting Admin Processing
2025.05.21 Awaiting Reviewer Scores
2025.06.08 Awaiting AE Decision
2025.06.09 Revision
2025.06.26 Revision submitted
2025.06.26 Awaiting Admin Processing
2025.06.27 Awaiting AE Decision
2025.06.30 Awaiting Reviewer Scores
2025.07.10 Awaiting AE Decision
2025.07.11 Revision
2025.07.15 Revision submitted
2025.07.21 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment
2025.07.21 Awaiting AE Decision
2025.07.22 Accepted

(0) 讚！ | 浙大玉泉

2025
7.04 Submit
7.04 Awaiting Admin Assignment
7.04 Awaiting Reviewer Selection
7.04 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment
7.05 Awaiting Reviewer Scores
7.16 Awaiting AE Decision
7.17 Awaiting Reviewer Scores
7.21 Reject

There were five reviewers, two of whom were quite negative, so the editor rejected the paper directly. However, overall the reviewers were quite professional and raised valid points. The process was quite fast, thanks to the efficient work of the editor and reviewers, which did not delay things. I will continue to work hard next time and support domestic journals!

(0) 讚！ | leafarc

Awaiting Reviewer Scores, the situation where reviewer opinions are not favorable does not exist.

(0) 讚！ | SUN26

Could you please let me know the status of the submission of this journal?

(0) 讚！ | leafarc

What is the status of this journal submission? Is it under review or Awaiting Reviewer Scores?

(0) 讚！ | leafarc

Although I know it's difficult, I still hope to pass the exam.

(0) 讚！ | wuishishuiya

I am applying for a chemistry journal in the first quartile. I am considering a domestic journal for more stability in the journal ranking, and it also has a high SCI impact factor. I hope everything goes smoothly!

(0) 讚！ | letpub_2020

The team is being cautious about submitting their work, it's very challenging.

(0) 讚！ | tianshi

Proofs will be available one month after acceptance, and the official DOI typically takes three months. However, information will be uploaded to the Chinese website after proofing, so it can be viewed. Aizweil will be slower.

(0) 讚！ | tianshi

I also received the version 1.14, but it has not been proofread yet. It's frustrating.

(0) 讚！ | 五山第一中单

12.31 Submit
01.01 Awaiting Reviewer Scores
01.16 Major Revisions by 3 reviewers
02.11 Resubmitted
02.11 Awaiting Reviewer Scores
02.25 Awaiting Associate Editor Decision
02.26 Accept

(0) 讚！ | Dr. Jie

Please submit the following text for translation: 1.22submit

(0) 讚！ | XH

May I ask if you have received the proof after accepting it? Do you have a DOI number yet?

(0) 讚！ | Lucky catalysis

May I ask how long it will take to receive proof after accepting? It has been over a month since accepting and I still have not received anything.

(0) 讚！ | Lucky catalysis

The paper was rejected, and a few months later, I saw someone in my country had filed a patent with almost the same content.

(0) 讚！ | 夏雪草

Hello, is this journal peer-reviewed?

(0) 讚！ | 晨曦serendipity

Hello, is this journal very strict with the appearance? Can a small research group submit to it?

(0) 讚！ | 晨曦serendipity

9.14 submitted
9.21 Awaiting reviewer assignment
10.08 Awaiting reviewer scores
10.28 major revision
11.5 resubmitted
11.10 Awaiting reviewer scores
11.11 Accepted

The changes in the submission status can be referred to by everyone.

(0) 讚！ | 不吃葱的喵酱

Angew arbitration was rejected, and directly switched to Catalysis Chemistry Journal.

(0) 讚！ | tianshi

9.18 Submit
9.18 Awaiting Admin Assignment
9.20 Awaiting Reviewer Selection
9.30 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment
10.06 Awaiting Reviewer Scores
10.09 Awaiting AE Decision
10.10 Awaiting Reviewer Scores
10.19 Awaiting AE Decision
10.19 Major Revisions - 3 reviewers gave minor revisions, less than 20 comments
10.23 Resubmitted
10.24 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment
10.24 Awaiting Reviewer Scores
11.04 Awaiting AE Decision
11.05 Accept

You can refer to the changes in the submission status.

(1) 讚！ | tianshi

May I ask how long it takes for Argue to receive a response after the submission is rejected?

(0) 讚！ | smd

Just because your article is accepted does not mean you can claim how great this journal is, the public's eyes are sharp. As you said, there are many articles by top catalysts in this journal, which precisely indicates how serious the circle-jerking is in this journal. Of course, there are a few high-quality articles by non-top catalysts in this journal, but they are also few in number.

(0) 讚！ | LLLPPP213

Based on past submission experiences, whether a manuscript is sent for review or accepted for publication depends mainly on the quality, depth, and innovation of the article. If the quality is not good, even if it is authored by a famous person, it may still be rejected in the initial review.

Looking at the recent publications, there are indeed many articles by well-known experts in the catalysis field, which largely indicates that the articles are recognized by authoritative experts in the field. At the same time, there are also many articles from lesser-known research groups, so one cannot conclude that as long as an article is authored by a big name, it will be accepted.

To say that 99% of the articles are from China is an exaggeration. It appears that nearly 10% of the articles are purely from foreign correspondence, and there are also cases of international and domestic collaboration.

(0) 讚！ | Pingguo

Fairness, objectivity.

(0) 讚！ | Pingguo

At first, I thought I had seen it wrong, and I thought he was evaluating JC.

(2) 讚！ | 西域村夫