Brother, I submitted my article on May 4th and it was with the editor. Then on May 12th, I updated it with the editor. On May 13th, it entered the decision phase. Have you finished editing and resubmitted it with the correct format?

(0) 讚！ | 打灰工

You are kindly reminded that the invitation to resubmit does not indicate acceptance. Your manuscript will undergo a new evaluation. We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript and hope that this feedback will be helpful in refining your paper.

(0) 讚！ | River_heang

谢谢您提交您的手稿给CRST。经过初步评估，很遗憾地通知您，您的论文无法进一步进行。我们邀请您重新提交，并期待解决以下评论：
1.“要点”部分有一些特定要求。我们强烈建议您在手稿准备过程中遵循期刊网站上可访问的作者指南。
2.请指定一名作者为本文的通讯作者。

(0) 讚！ | River_heang

The editor is Teacher Qi Jilin.

(0) 讚！ | Cheney SABOR

Record:

Submitted on June 1, 2024
Major revisions on February 11, 2025
Revised on February 24, 2025
Accepted on March 16, 2025

The editing was good, but initially couldn't find reviewers. The editor sent out 14 review invitations, and it wasn't until November 2024 that one reviewer agreed to review. I followed up in November and added 3 more reviewers, resulting in feedback from three reviewers in February 2025. After major revisions, the manuscript was sent back to those three reviewers and accepted directly.

The entire process was quite lengthy, doubling the time compared to measurements and other articles.

(0) 讚！ | Cheney SABOR

Mar 06, 2025 Initial Date Submitted
Mar 06, 2025 With Editor (Isn't it that once submitted, it is in With Editor status? Handling Editor is Jilin Qi, hoping for review)

(0) 讚！ | River

Invested in February 2024, received in February 2025...

(0) 讚！ | Woken-up

The editing efficiency is too low, the backend has already seen the approval, but it is being delayed for a month.

(0) 讚！ | Woken-up

May I ask which editor is handling my manuscript? I have been waiting for review for 6 months, it has been sent to 3 reviewers and only received feedback from one of them. The other reviewer has not responded after more than 6 months.

(0) 讚！ | 薰衣草w

It took me from March to October to complete the first review, and I sent out 3 withdrawal emails. Now the revised manuscript has been sent back in October, but one of the previous reviewers cannot be contacted. I had to send it out for external review to 3 new reviewers, making the process difficult.

(0) 讚！ | Woken-up

It's difficult to evaluate the journal. There were three reviewers, two minor revisions and one major revision. The major revision was done three times and still requested rejection. I don't understand why the journal requirements are so strict, yet the impact factor is still so low.

(0) 讚！ | zhuzhu122

Hello, may I ask how long it takes for an external audit to add additional reviewers?

(0) 讚！ | hongpengzhang

9.14 under review.

(0) 讚！ | hongpengzhang

It has been 5 months since "under review" in April.
Out of 4 reviewers, only one has completed the review.
The process is dragging on.

(0) 讚！ | Woken-up

You can check how many reviewers have received the manuscript on the Elsevier wx public account.

(0) 讚！ | 倾尽1314

Are you okay?

(0) 讚！ | zousifang

How's it going? How's the progress?

(0) 讚！ | 天元子

6.12 submitted to journals/with editor
6.21 with editor
7.5 under review

(0) 讚！ | hongpengzhang

On the 18th floor. The review opinions of the two reviewers are mostly minor issues. It took one year from submission to the first review notice, with a total of two reviewers. One gave minor revisions, and the other raised many professional issues, gave acceptance after modifications, and the reviewers' opinions were quite professional. After two revisions, the editor directly said to reject the manuscript based on the reviewers' suggestions, so I have to reject it. What a miracle operation??? Trash journal, waste of time. Disgusting, all nepotism. Be cautious.

(1) 讚！ | 12233333/

Reject on May 16th as it does not fall within the scope of the journal, please provide feedback sooner

(0) 讚！ | luohuayu

On April 17th, with editor

(0) 讚！ | luohuayu

On April 17th, with Editor

(0) 讚！ | luohuayu

On April 12, with editor

(0) 讚！ | luohuayu

It took one year from submission to the first review notice, reminding once in November 23rd, and only then started to look for reviewers. Two reviewers in total, one gave minor revisions, the other raised many professional questions, accepted after revisions, the reviewer's opinions were quite professional; however, the editor directly suggested rejecting the manuscript, so I had to reject it. Is this divine operation??? Terrible journal, waste of time

(1) 讚！ | jl

I feel like you are so fast, my application has been under review for three months and it is still not done. I followed up once and it has been half a month, is there still hope?

(0) 讚！ | shulibin