After two months of submission, it has finally entered the "Under Review" status.

(0) 讚！ | 慧海2019

It has been over 1.5 months since submission, and it is still with the editor. Where is the editor?

(1) 讚！ | 慧海2019

Accepted! Celebrate with fireworks! It took approximately 7 months from submission in October 2025 to acceptance in April 2026, which is actually quite fast! The editors and reviewers were very responsible, and the quality of the article has visibly improved a lot!

(0) 讚！ | Oct_5299

Similarly, the speed is really slow.

(0) 讚！ | SineCN

It has been a whole month since submission and the status is still "With Editor"!

(0) 讚！ | 慧海2019

The assigned editor is Teacher QI Jilin, but he is really slow. Submitted in November 25th, 2025, then received major revisions on January 19th, 2026, submitted revised manuscript on February 9th, 2026, and heard nothing in between. After following up once, the editor sent it for review. On March 30th, 2026, the system showed "Required Reviews Completed," but there has been no news since. Hoping for a quick result.

(0) 讚！ | Oct_5299

Okay, thank you.

(0) 讚！ | Jasmine

The three reviewers at the time did not clearly indicate any specific issues that needed to be addressed in the question of whether, so I ignored it. Logically, the opinions in the subsequent review comments will definitely include opinions on the question of whether.

(0) 讚！ | 孙亚龙

Hello, I would like to inquire whether it is necessary to reply to the comments below the "yes" or "no" options for each section in the rework editor's letter, or if it is only necessary to reply to the comments from the reviewers in the attachment.

(0) 讚！ | Jasmine

Hello, I would like to inquire whether the feedback under the "yes" or "no" option in the return-to-editing letter from the reviewer needs to be responded to, or if only the feedback from the attachment's reviewer needs to be replied to.

(0) 讚！ | Jasmine

2.28 was rejected, the lack of originality in the manuscript! It's really speechless, zky is like a barren garden after the cold and drought!

(0) 讚！ | 力争TOP打灰人

25.11.25 Submission
25.12.11 Review
25.12.30 Major revision (3 reviewers)
26.01.16 Revision
26.02.01 Acceptance
The review process was much faster than expected, and it seems like the Christmas holiday had no impact at all. Thanks to the editor and reviewers.

(0) 讚！ | 孙亚龙

After the submission is confirmed on November 2nd, with editor
On November 12th
On November 13th
...
It will take approximately 20-25 days from "with editor" to "Under review". I hope it can be reviewed soon! Wrapping up the work towards the end of my PhD.

(0) 讚！ | 力争TOP打灰人

How are you doing, brother?

(0) 讚！ | keyan niuma

Hello! The message "Proofs available for checking" in the Track link, does it mean that the proofreading link has been sent? But I have not received the proofreading email.

(0) 讚！ | 摸鱼今天又摸鱼了吗

Where can I see which teacher made edits?

(0) 讚！ | keyan niuma

After the major revision, one reviewer has not reviewed the manuscript yet, so the editor added another reviewer.

(0) 讚！ | yijia814

The editor is very responsible, and the reviewers are very professional. The first round of review provided major revisions, the second round provided minor revisions, and the third round led to acceptance for publication.

(0) 讚！ | yijia814

Build a building on July 3, 2025.

(0) 讚！ | 牙膏c

Does anyone know what happens when the reviewer runs away after a revision? How will the journal handle this situation?

(0) 讚！ | 元宝守护者

Brother, I submitted my article on May 4th and it was with the editor. Then on May 12th, I updated it with the editor. On May 13th, it entered the decision phase. Have you finished editing and resubmitted it with the correct format?

(0) 讚！ | 打灰工

You are kindly reminded that the invitation to resubmit does not indicate acceptance. Your manuscript will undergo a new evaluation. We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript and hope that this feedback will be helpful in refining your paper.

(0) 讚！ | River_heang

谢谢您提交您的手稿给CRST。经过初步评估，很遗憾地通知您，您的论文无法进一步进行。我们邀请您重新提交，并期待解决以下评论：
1.“要点”部分有一些特定要求。我们强烈建议您在手稿准备过程中遵循期刊网站上可访问的作者指南。
2.请指定一名作者为本文的通讯作者。

(0) 讚！ | River_heang

The editor is Teacher Qi Jilin.

(0) 讚！ | Cheney SABOR

Record:

Submitted on June 1, 2024
Major revisions on February 11, 2025
Revised on February 24, 2025
Accepted on March 16, 2025

The editing was good, but initially couldn't find reviewers. The editor sent out 14 review invitations, and it wasn't until November 2024 that one reviewer agreed to review. I followed up in November and added 3 more reviewers, resulting in feedback from three reviewers in February 2025. After major revisions, the manuscript was sent back to those three reviewers and accepted directly.

The entire process was quite lengthy, doubling the time compared to measurements and other articles.

(0) 讚！ | Cheney SABOR