6.20 submitted
6.23 Lack of novelty in writing, sent back for revision, requested to resubmit within 3 days
6.25 submitted
7.2 with editor (indeed, a week...)
Please accept it, please, I've given you a chance.
Rejection replied on the evening of 7.2. Sigh, it must be because the highlights were not achieved.

(0) 讚！ | H·O·H

2025.11.05 Submit to journal
2025.11.12 With editor
2025.11.30 UR (2 reviewers)
2026.02.15 RRC (review completed, 6+9 comments, revision time 20 days)
2026.03.01 R1 submission
2026.03.02 with editor
2026.03.08 UR (2/2/0)
2026.03.18 UR (2/2/1)
2026.06.01 Accept (one reviewer did not submit comments for three months, accepted after reminder on June 1st)

(0) 讚！ | CNF必中

The questions raised by the reviewers are very professional and have greatly improved the quality of the paper. It is indeed a top journal in the field, although it may not be highly ranked in terms of impact factor. The journal is highly recognized within the industry, and I hope to be published in it again in the future.

(0) 讚！ | TeChin

May I ask if there is any news now? I have been waiting for the review for 3 months and haven't heard anything yet.

(0) 讚！ | 三亿分之一秒前的我

Indeed, sb.

(0) 讚！ | leafshine

The subcategories are already in three sections, this journal is not interesting anymore.

(0) 讚！ | 读博打工记

I am also tired of it.

(0) 讚！ | Shoujia LEE

Is this true? My dear, half of my heart feels cold.

(0) 讚！ | Lejos

Stupid Chinese Academy of Sciences, once hired, they are demoted to the district, idiot.

(2) 讚！ | j_ee

How come you are so incompetent this year that you ended up in Zone 2?

(0) 讚！ | 读博打工记

I also have a CNF article. Keep a record of it.
25.10.20 Submission
25.10.22 Under Review (10/0/0)
25.12.09 Major Revision (10/2/2)
26.1.16 Revised
26.1.17 Under Review (2/0/0)
26.2.21 Accepted

(0) 讚！ | j_ee

2026.2.25 Under Review 4/0/0
Does anyone know the acceptance rate of this journal after submission?

(0) 讚！ | wusushhsjsn

Before it reached the editor, it took me two weeks.

(0) 讚！ | CNF必中

Just wait.

(0) 讚！ | 爱搞学术的小傻子

Can I ask why it still shows "submit to journal" after a week and hasn't reached the editor's hands yet, is it because the co-authors have not been verified?

(0) 讚！ | ddss402540

Likewise, the reviewer has been silent for over a month after accepting the review.

(0) 讚！ | CNF必中

Do any teachers know if this journal will reprocess or send it back to the reviewers if the reviewers have not submitted their comments for 4 months after accepting the review?

(0) 讚！ | 爱搞学术的小傻子

May I ask how long the review period for reviewers is in this journal?

(0) 讚！ | 爱搞学术的小傻子

Hey brother, how long does the review process take?

(0) 讚！ | 收

Please translate the following paragraph into English: 3, 1, 1

(0) 讚！ | HPUY

It has been a month since submission, and it is still 3 reviews required to complete 0. Can I email the editor to request inviting new reviewers?

(0) 讚！ | HPUY

Insert the eye and return to Area One.

(0) 讚！ | 11111_10

Can I ask the original poster, are the chances of being approved for submission and acceptance high?

(0) 讚！ | caoyunqi

Submission on July 3, 2024
Received first review comments on September 4, 2024. One reviewer accepted it directly, while the other two had a total of 14 questions. The editor-in-chief requested major revisions.
Submitted revised version on September 30, 2024.
Accepted on October 8, 2024.
The efficiency of CNF has improved significantly compared to before. The entire submission process took 3 months. The editor-in-chief responsible for my article was also very friendly. Wishing CNF continued success!

(1) 讚！ | 郎海鲲

The first submission was rejected after a month, with one rejection and one minor revision before resubmission. The second submission was under review for over five months before receiving feedback and ultimately being accepted. The editor was quick to handle key points, such as the initial submission to the journal, assignment to an editor, and review feedback. However, the review process was slow due to only inviting three reviewers, leading to delays if any of them did not provide timely feedback.

(1) 讚！ | Newbniz